Biehl Raphael, Boecking Benjamin, Brueggemann Petra, Grosse Romina, Mazurek Birgit
Tinnitus Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin-Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 24;10:3093. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03093. eCollection 2019.
Despite vulnerability-stress models underlying a variety of distress-related emotional syndromes, few studies have investigated interactions between personality factors and subjectively experienced stressors in accounting for tinnitus-related distress.
The present study compared personality characteristics between patients with chronic tinnitus and the general population. Within the patient sample, it was further examined whether personality dimensions predicted tinnitus-related distress and, if so, whether differential aspects or levels of perceived stress mediated these effects.
Applying a cross-sectional design, 100 patients with chronic tinnitus completed the Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar () measuring personality, the Perceived Stress Questionnaire () measuring perceived stress and the German version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire ( measuring tinnitus-related distress. FPI-R scores were compared with normed values obtained from a representative German reference population. Mediation analyses were computed specifying FPI-R scores as independent, PSQ20 scores as mediating and the TQ-total score as dependent variables.
Patients with chronic tinnitus significantly differed from the general population across a variety of personality indices. Tinnitus-related distress was mediated by differential interactions between personality factors and perceived stress dimensions.
In conceptualizing tinnitus-related distress, idiosyncratic assessments of vulnerability-stress interactions are crucial for devising effective psychological treatment strategies. Patients' somatic complaints and worries appear to be partly informed by opposing tendencies reflecting emotional excitability vs. aggressive inhibition - suggesting emotion-focused treatment strategies as a promising new direction for alleviating distress.
尽管多种与痛苦相关的情绪综合征都基于脆弱性-应激模型,但很少有研究调查人格因素与主观体验到的应激源之间的相互作用对耳鸣相关痛苦的影响。
本研究比较了慢性耳鸣患者与普通人群的人格特征。在患者样本中,进一步研究人格维度是否能预测耳鸣相关痛苦,如果可以,感知应激的不同方面或水平是否介导了这些影响。
采用横断面设计,100名慢性耳鸣患者完成了测量人格的弗赖堡人格问卷(FPI-R)、测量感知应激的感知应激问卷(PSQ20)以及德文版耳鸣问卷(TQ)以评估耳鸣相关痛苦。将FPI-R得分与从具有代表性的德国参考人群中获得的常模值进行比较。以FPI-R得分作为自变量、PSQ20得分作为中介变量、TQ总分作为因变量进行中介分析。
慢性耳鸣患者在多种人格指标上与普通人群存在显著差异。耳鸣相关痛苦是由人格因素与感知应激维度之间的不同相互作用介导的。
在概念化耳鸣相关痛苦时,对脆弱性-应激相互作用的个性化评估对于制定有效的心理治疗策略至关重要。患者的躯体症状和担忧似乎部分受到反映情绪兴奋性与攻击性抑制的相反倾向的影响——这表明以情绪为中心的治疗策略是减轻痛苦的一个有前景的新方向。