NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Reutlingen, Germany.
Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 16;13:828053. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.828053. eCollection 2022.
Recent increases in SARS-CoV-2 infections have led to questions about duration and quality of vaccine-induced immune protection. While numerous studies have been published on immune responses triggered by vaccination, these often focus on studying the impact of one or two immunisation schemes within subpopulations such as immunocompromised individuals or healthcare workers. To provide information on the duration and quality of vaccine-induced immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, we analyzed antibody titres against various SARS-CoV-2 antigens and ACE2 binding inhibition against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and variants of concern in samples from a large German population-based seroprevalence study (MuSPAD) who had received all currently available immunisation schemes. We found that homologous mRNA-based or heterologous prime-boost vaccination produced significantly higher antibody responses than vector-based homologous vaccination. Ad26.CoV2S.2 performance was particularly concerning with reduced titres and 91.7% of samples classified as non-responsive for ACE2 binding inhibition, suggesting that recipients require a booster mRNA vaccination. While mRNA vaccination induced a higher ratio of RBD- and S1-targeting antibodies, vector-based vaccines resulted in an increased proportion of S2-targeting antibodies. Given the role of RBD- and S1-specific antibodies in neutralizing SARS-CoV-2, their relative over-representation after mRNA vaccination may explain why these vaccines have increased efficacy compared to vector-based formulations. Previously infected individuals had a robust immune response once vaccinated, regardless of which vaccine they received, which could aid future dose allocation should shortages arise for certain manufacturers. Overall, both titres and ACE2 binding inhibition peaked approximately 28 days post-second vaccination and then decreased.
最近 SARS-CoV-2 感染的增加引发了人们对疫苗诱导免疫保护的持续时间和质量的疑问。虽然已经有许多关于疫苗接种引发的免疫反应的研究发表,但这些研究通常集中在研究免疫功能低下个体或医护人员等亚群中一种或两种免疫方案的影响。为了提供关于针对 SARS-CoV-2 的疫苗诱导免疫反应的持续时间和质量的信息,我们分析了来自德国一项大型基于人群的血清流行率研究(MuSPAD)的样本中针对各种 SARS-CoV-2 抗原的抗体滴度和针对 SARS-CoV-2 野生型和关注变体的 ACE2 结合抑制。我们发现,同源的基于 mRNA 的或异源的初级-加强疫苗接种比基于载体的同源疫苗接种产生更高的抗体反应。Ad26.CoV2S.2 的表现尤其令人担忧,其抗体滴度降低,91.7%的样本被归类为 ACE2 结合抑制无反应,这表明受体需要加强 mRNA 疫苗接种。虽然 mRNA 疫苗接种诱导了更高比例的 RBD 和 S1 靶向抗体,但基于载体的疫苗接种导致了更多的 S2 靶向抗体。鉴于 RBD 和 S1 特异性抗体在中和 SARS-CoV-2 中的作用,它们在 mRNA 疫苗接种后相对过度表达可能解释了为什么这些疫苗比基于载体的配方具有更高的疗效。以前感染过的个体一旦接种疫苗就会产生强大的免疫反应,无论他们接种了哪种疫苗,这有助于在某些制造商出现短缺时为未来的剂量分配提供帮助。总的来说,抗体滴度和 ACE2 结合抑制在第二次接种后约 28 天达到峰值,然后下降。