• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

厄瓜多尔大学社区对转基因生物的态度。

Attitudes of the Ecuadorian University Community Toward Genetically Modified Organisms.

作者信息

Román Collazo Carlos, Chacha Guerrero Karen, Loja Mejia Tatiana, Andrade Campoverde Diego, Hernández Rodriguez Yenima

机构信息

Faculty of Biochemistry and Pharmacy, Catholic University of Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.

Faculty of Clinical Psychology, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 18;9:801891. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.801891. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2021.801891
PMID:35252162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8894883/
Abstract

The acceptance of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) by the civilian population in Ecuador is a controversial issue, where beliefs and practices are determinant. In Ecuador, the use of GMOs for research or productive purposes has been banned since 2008; however, the current position of the population toward this technology is unknown. The aim of the study was to explain the attitude toward GMOs in the Ecuadorian university population based on sociodemographic variables, knowledge, beliefs, practices, and bioethical approach. A validated survey was applied to 719 students and teachers of the Catholic University of Cuenca through Google Forms. The collected data were processed using SPSS 23.0 software. Multivariate and linear regression analyses were used to explain the attitude toward GMOs based on the variables studied. Partial approval of GMO use is research-oriented, with a rejection toward food. The linear regression model explained 65% of the variance of attitude toward GMOs from the beliefs, practices, knowledge, and bioethical approach variables. The sociodemographic variables were completely excluded from the model due to the absence of statistical significance. The incipient acceptance of GMOs in the academic sector corroborates a transformation in the thinking of Ecuadorian civil society. Considerations on the use of GMOs are supported by a bioethical approach that leans toward a pragmatic utilitarianism based on the immediate or mediate benefits of the technology.

摘要

厄瓜多尔民众对转基因生物(GMOs)的接受情况是一个颇具争议的问题,其中信仰和行为起着决定性作用。在厄瓜多尔,自2008年起就禁止将转基因生物用于研究或生产目的;然而,目前民众对这项技术的态度尚不清楚。本研究的目的是基于社会人口统计学变量、知识、信仰、行为以及生物伦理方法,解释厄瓜多尔大学人群对转基因生物的态度。通过谷歌表单,对昆卡天主教大学的719名学生和教师进行了一项经过验证的调查。使用SPSS 23.0软件对收集到的数据进行处理。采用多元线性回归分析,根据所研究的变量解释对转基因生物的态度。对转基因生物使用的部分认可主要是基于研究目的,而对用于食品则持拒绝态度。线性回归模型从信仰、行为、知识和生物伦理方法变量中解释了对转基因生物态度差异的65%。由于缺乏统计学意义,社会人口统计学变量被完全排除在模型之外。学术领域对转基因生物的初步接受证实了厄瓜多尔民间社会思维的转变。对转基因生物使用的考量得到了一种生物伦理方法的支持,这种方法倾向于基于该技术的直接或间接利益的实用功利主义。

相似文献

1
Attitudes of the Ecuadorian University Community Toward Genetically Modified Organisms.厄瓜多尔大学社区对转基因生物的态度。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 18;9:801891. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.801891. eCollection 2021.
2
Knowlege of, attitudes toward, and acceptance of genetically modified organisms among prospective teachers of biology, home economics, and grade school in Slovenia.
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2010 May;38(3):141-50. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20377.
3
Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes on Genetically Modified Foods Among Students Studying Life Sciences.生命科学专业学生对转基因食品的知识与态度评估
Cureus. 2022 Dec 20;14(12):e32744. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32744. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Readiness of adolescents to use genetically modified organisms according to their knowledge and emotional attitude towards GMOs.根据青少年对转基因生物的知识和情感态度,了解他们使用转基因生物的意愿。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017 Jun 7;24(2):194-200. doi: 10.26444/aaem/74478. Epub 2017 May 15.
5
GMO Food Labels Do Not Affect College Student Food Selection, Despite Negative Attitudes towards GMOs.转基因食品标签不会影响大学生的食物选择,尽管他们对转基因食品持负面态度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041761.
6
Similarities and differences with the 'general public': Chinese civil servants' attitude to genetically modified organisms and its influencing factors.与“公众”的异同:中国公务员对转基因生物的态度及其影响因素。
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2256929.
7
Food engineers' attitudes and purchasing intentions towards genetically modified organism products.食品工程师对转基因生物产品的态度和购买意愿。
Nutr Health. 2024 Dec;30(4):789-796. doi: 10.1177/02601060221144126. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
8
EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.欧洲食品安全局成立头十年在转基因生物风险评估方面的科学活动与成果:回顾与展望。
Transgenic Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11248-013-9741-4. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
9
Comparison of three DNA extraction methods for the detection and quantification of GMO in Ecuadorian manufactured food.三种DNA提取方法用于检测和定量厄瓜多尔加工食品中转基因生物的比较。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 20;10(1):758. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3083-x.
10
The Ethics of Introducing GMOs into sub-Saharan Africa: Considerations from the sub-Saharan African Theory of Ubuntu.将转基因生物引入撒哈拉以南非洲的伦理问题:基于撒哈拉以南非洲乌班图理论的思考
Bioethics. 2015 Nov;29(9):604-12. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12191.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the future of GM technology in sustainable local food systems in Colombia.探索转基因技术在哥伦比亚可持续地方粮食系统中的未来。
Front Genome Ed. 2023 Jun 30;5:1181811. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2023.1181811. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Food safety, food security and genetically modified organisms in Africa: a current perspective.非洲的食品安全、粮食安全和转基因生物:当前视角。
Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2021 Apr;37(1):30-63. doi: 10.1080/02648725.2021.1940735. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
2
Misinformation and public opinion of science and health: Approaches, findings, and future directions.错误信息与公众对科学和健康的意见:方法、发现与未来方向。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912437117.
3
Promoting Ethically Responsible Use of Agricultural Biotechnology.
促进农业生物技术的负责任使用。
Trends Plant Sci. 2021 Jun;26(6):546-559. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: A Nationwide Chinese Consumer Study.公众对转基因食品的认知:一项全国性的中国消费者研究。
NPJ Sci Food. 2018 Jun 5;2:10. doi: 10.1038/s41538-018-0018-4. eCollection 2018.
5
An Overview of Attitudes Toward Genetically Engineered Food.对转基因食品态度的概述。
Annu Rev Nutr. 2018 Aug 21;38:459-479. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071715-051223. Epub 2018 May 25.
6
A Bridge Back to the Future: Public Health Ethics, Bioethics, and Environmental Ethics.通向未来的桥梁:公共卫生伦理学、生命伦理学和环境伦理学。
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Sep;17(9):5-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1353164.
7
Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon.公众对转基因三文鱼态度的决定因素
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e86174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086174. eCollection 2014.
8
Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology.专家及公众对生物技术风险的认知。
Risk Anal. 2004 Oct;24(5):1289-99. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00526.x.
9
Attitudes toward biotechnology in the European Union.欧盟对生物技术的态度。
J Biotechnol. 2002 Sep 11;98(1):9-24. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(02)00082-2.