• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转基因食品标签不会影响大学生的食物选择,尽管他们对转基因食品持负面态度。

GMO Food Labels Do Not Affect College Student Food Selection, Despite Negative Attitudes towards GMOs.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041761.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18041761
PMID:33670285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7917688/
Abstract

US Public Law 114-216 dictates that food producers in the United States of America will be required to label foods containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) starting in 2022; however, there is little empirical evidence demonstrating how U.S. consumers would use food labels that indicate the presence or absence of GMOs. The aim of this two-phase study was to determine how attitudes towards GMOs relate to food choices and how labels indicating the presence or absence of GMOs differentially impact choices among college students-the age group which values transparent food labeling more than any other. Participants ( = 434) made yes/no choices for each of 64 foods. In both phases of the study, participants were randomly assigned to seeing GMO Free labels, contains GMOs labels, or no GMO labels. Across the two phases, 85% of participants reported believing that GMOs were at least somewhat dangerous to health (42% believed GMOs to be dangerous), yet in both studies, although eye-tracking data verified that participants attended to the GMO labels, these labels did not significantly affect food choices. Although college consumers may believe GMOs to be dangerous, their food choices do not reflect this belief.

摘要

美国公共法 114-216 规定,自 2022 年起,美国的食品生产商将被要求对含有转基因生物 (GMO) 的食品进行标注;然而,几乎没有实证证据表明美国消费者将如何使用表明是否存在 GMO 的食品标签。这项两阶段研究的目的是确定对 GMO 的态度如何与食物选择相关,以及表明是否存在 GMO 的标签如何对大学生(比其他任何群体都更重视食品标签透明度的年龄群体)的选择产生不同影响。参与者(n=434)对 64 种食品中的每一种都进行了是/否选择。在研究的两个阶段中,参与者被随机分配到看到“无 GMO”标签、“含有 GMO”标签或没有 GMO 标签的组。在两个阶段中,85%的参与者表示他们认为 GMO 对健康至少有一定危害(42%的人认为 GMO 是危险的),但在两项研究中,尽管眼动追踪数据证实参与者注意到了 GMO 标签,但这些标签并没有显著影响食物选择。尽管大学生消费者可能认为 GMO 是危险的,但他们的食物选择并未反映出这种信念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/51fa7ef6bda7/ijerph-18-01761-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/cdf25e03a8f6/ijerph-18-01761-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/4240338fcb92/ijerph-18-01761-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/63b27895b61b/ijerph-18-01761-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/29b50994e763/ijerph-18-01761-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/51fa7ef6bda7/ijerph-18-01761-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/cdf25e03a8f6/ijerph-18-01761-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/4240338fcb92/ijerph-18-01761-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/63b27895b61b/ijerph-18-01761-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/29b50994e763/ijerph-18-01761-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3863/7917688/51fa7ef6bda7/ijerph-18-01761-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
GMO Food Labels Do Not Affect College Student Food Selection, Despite Negative Attitudes towards GMOs.转基因食品标签不会影响大学生的食物选择,尽管他们对转基因食品持负面态度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041761.
2
Governing GMOs in the USA: science, law and public health.美国对转基因生物的管理:科学、法律与公共卫生
J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Apr;96(6):1851-5. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7523. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
3
Exploring the GMO narrative through labeling: strategies, products, and politics.通过标签探索转基因生物的叙述:策略、产品和政治。
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):51-66. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2318027. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
4
Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information.消费者对转基因生物的认知及信息来源。
Adv Nutr. 2015 Nov 13;6(6):842-51. doi: 10.3945/an.115.008870. Print 2015 Nov.
5
Readiness of adolescents to use genetically modified organisms according to their knowledge and emotional attitude towards GMOs.根据青少年对转基因生物的知识和情感态度,了解他们使用转基因生物的意愿。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017 Jun 7;24(2):194-200. doi: 10.26444/aaem/74478. Epub 2017 May 15.
6
GMOs, genetically modified organisms or genuinely mixed opinions? A reasonable Consumer’s understanding of the terms "GMO" and "non-GMO," and the struggle to set a Standard. .转基因生物,是真正经过基因改造的生物还是众说纷纭的观点?消费者对“转基因”和“非转基因”术语的合理理解,以及制定标准的艰难过程。
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2017;48(1):221-48.
7
Food Labeling and Consumer Associations with Health, Safety, and Environment.食品标签以及消费者与健康、安全和环境的关联。
J Law Med Ethics. 2016 Dec;44(4):630-638. doi: 10.1177/1073110516684805.
8
Semiautomated TaqMan PCR screening of GMO labelled samples for (unauthorised) GMOs.对转基因生物(GMO)标签样本进行(未经授权的)转基因生物的半自动TaqMan PCR筛选。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017 Jun;409(15):3877-3889. doi: 10.1007/s00216-017-0333-7. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
9
Food engineers' attitudes and purchasing intentions towards genetically modified organism products.食品工程师对转基因生物产品的态度和购买意愿。
Nutr Health. 2024 Dec;30(4):789-796. doi: 10.1177/02601060221144126. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
10
Approaches in the risk assessment of genetically modified foods by the Hellenic Food Safety Authority.希腊食品安全局对转基因食品进行风险评估的方法。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Apr;45(4):530-42. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of International Coexistence Management of Genetically Modified and Non-Genetically Modified Crops.转基因作物与非转基因作物国际共存管理分析
Plants (Basel). 2025 Mar 13;14(6):895. doi: 10.3390/plants14060895.
2
Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes on Genetically Modified Foods Among Students Studying Life Sciences.生命科学专业学生对转基因食品的知识与态度评估
Cureus. 2022 Dec 20;14(12):e32744. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32744. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainable Diet Dimensions. Comparing Consumer Preference for Nutrition, Environmental and Social Responsibility Food Labelling: A Systematic Review.可持续饮食维度。比较消费者对营养、环境和社会责任食品标签的偏好:一项系统综述。
Sustainability. 2019 Nov 21;11(23):6575. doi: 10.3390/su11236575.
2
Signaling impacts of GMO labeling on fruit and vegetable demand.转基因食品标签对水果和蔬菜需求的信号影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 30;14(10):e0223910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223910. eCollection 2019.
3
Socioeconomic Status and the Prediction of Health Promoting Dietary Behaviours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.
社会经济地位与促进健康饮食行为的预测:基于计划行为理论的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2019 Nov;11(3):382-406. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12154. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Making sense of the "clean label" trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications.解读“清洁标签”趋势:消费者食品选择行为综述及对行业的启示。
Food Res Int. 2017 Sep;99(Pt 1):58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
5
Food Labeling and Consumer Associations with Health, Safety, and Environment.食品标签以及消费者与健康、安全和环境的关联。
J Law Med Ethics. 2016 Dec;44(4):630-638. doi: 10.1177/1073110516684805.
6
Attitudes vs. Purchase Behaviors as Experienced Dissonance: The Roles of Knowledge and Consumer Orientations in Organic Market.作为体验性失调的态度与购买行为:知识和消费者导向在有机市场中的作用
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 24;8:248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00248. eCollection 2017.
7
The theory of planned behaviour and discrete food choices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.计划行为理论与离散食物选择:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Dec 30;12:162. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0324-z.
8
Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information.消费者对转基因生物的认知及信息来源。
Adv Nutr. 2015 Nov 13;6(6):842-51. doi: 10.3945/an.115.008870. Print 2015 Nov.
9
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis: The Theory of Planned Behavior's application to understand and predict nutrition-related behaviors in youth.一项系统的文献综述与荟萃分析:计划行为理论在理解和预测青少年营养相关行为中的应用。
Eat Behav. 2015 Aug;18:160-78. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
Nutrition label use partially mediates the relationship between attitude toward healthy eating and overall dietary quality among college students.营养标签的使用部分中介了大学生对健康饮食的态度与整体饮食质量之间的关系。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Mar;112(3):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.047.