Suppr超能文献

胰岛素抵抗患者中风或短暂性脑缺血发作后使用较低剂量吡格列酮的疗效。

Efficacy of lower doses of pioglitazone after stroke or transient ischaemic attack in patients with insulin resistance.

机构信息

Stroke Prevention & Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Section of General Medicine Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Jun;24(6):1150-1158. doi: 10.1111/dom.14687. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

Abstract

AIMS

Pioglitazone is a potent insulin-sensitizing drug with anti-atherosclerotic properties, but adverse effects have limited its use. We assessed the benefits and risks of lower versus higher doses of pioglitazone taken by participants in the Insulin Resistance Intervention in Stroke Trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Efficacy [myocardial infarction (MI) or recurrent stroke] new-onset diabetes) and adverse outcomes (oedema, weight gain, heart failure and bone fracture) were examined for subjects assigned to pioglitazone or placebo within strata defined by mode dose of study drug taken (i.e. the dose taken on most days in the study).

RESULTS

Among the 1938 patients randomized to pioglitazone, the mode dose was <15 mg/day in 546 participants, 15 mg/day in 128, 30 mg/day in 89, and 45 mg/day in 1175. There was no significant effect on stroke/MI or new-onset diabetes with <15 mg/day. For 15 mg/30 mg/day pooled, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) for stroke/MI were 0.48 (0.30, 0.76; p = .002) and 0.74 (0.69, 0.94) for 45 mg/day. For new-onset diabetes, the adjusted hazard ratios were 0.34 (0.15, 0.81; p = .001) and 0.31 (0.59, 0.94; p = .001) respectively. For oedema, weight gain and heart failure, the risk estimates for pioglitazone were lower for subjects taking <45 mg daily. For fractures, the increased risk with pioglitazone was similar across all dose strata.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower doses of pioglitazone appear to confer much of the benefit with less adverse effects than the full dose. Further study is needed to confirm these findings so that clinicians may optimize dosing of this secondary prevention strategy in patients with stroke.

摘要

目的

吡格列酮是一种具有抗动脉粥样硬化作用的强效胰岛素增敏药物,但不良反应限制了其应用。我们评估了胰岛素抵抗干预卒中试验中接受低剂量和高剂量吡格列酮治疗的参与者的获益和风险。

材料和方法

根据研究药物的剂量模式(即研究期间多数天数服用的剂量),对接受吡格列酮或安慰剂的受试者进行了疗效(心肌梗死[MI]或复发性卒中)和不良结局(水肿、体重增加、心力衰竭和骨折)的评估。

结果

在 1938 名随机分配至吡格列酮的患者中,546 名患者的模式剂量<15mg/天,128 名患者为 15mg/天,89 名患者为 30mg/天,1175 名患者为 45mg/天。<15mg/天剂量与卒中/MI 或新发糖尿病之间无显著影响。对于 15/30mg/天的合并剂量,卒中/MI 的调整后的危险比(95%CI)为 0.48(0.30,0.76;p=0.002)和 0.74(0.69,0.94),45mg/天剂量的相应比值为 0.74(0.69,0.94)。对于新发糖尿病,调整后的危险比分别为 0.34(0.15,0.81;p=0.001)和 0.31(0.59,0.94;p=0.001)。对于水肿、体重增加和心力衰竭,每天服用<45mg 吡格列酮的受试者的风险估计值较低。对于骨折,吡格列酮的风险增加在所有剂量分层中相似。

结论

低剂量的吡格列酮似乎能带来大部分获益,且不良反应少于全剂量。需要进一步研究以证实这些发现,以便临床医生在卒中患者中优化这种二级预防策略的剂量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验