• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多标志物风险筛查前列腺癌。

Multi-marker risk-based screening for prostate cancer.

机构信息

Institute of Health Informatics, 4919University College London, London, UK.

Population Health Research Institute, 4915St George's University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2022 Jun;29(2):123-133. doi: 10.1177/09691413221076415. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1177/09691413221076415
PMID:35255236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9087319/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine prostate cancer screening performance using prostate specific antigen (PSA) along with other markers, expressing markers in age-specific multiples of the median (MoM), and age.

METHODS

A prospective nested case-control study used stored serum from 571 men who died of, or with history of, prostate cancer (cases), and 2169 matched controls. Total, free and intact PSA, human kallikrein-related peptidase 2 (hK2), and microseminoprotein were measured and converted into MoM values. Screening marker distribution parameters were estimated in cases and controls. Monte Carlo simulation used these in a risk-based algorithm to estimate screening performance (detection rates [DRs] and false-positive rates [FPRs]).

RESULTS

Almost all (99%) cases occurred aged ≥55. Marker values were similar in cases who did and did not die of prostate cancer. Combining age, total PSA and hK2 MoM values (other markers added little or no discrimination) yielded a 1.2% FPR (95% CI 0.2-4.8%) for a 90% DR (59-98%) in men who died of or with a prostate cancer diagnosis within 5 years of blood collection (risk cut-off 1 in 20), two-thirds less than the 4.5% FPR using total PSA alone measured in ng/ml for the same 90% DR (cut-off 3.1 ng/ml). Screening performance over 10 years yielded a 33% (22-46%) FPR for a 90% DR.

CONCLUSION

Screening performed up to every 5 years from age 55 using the multi-marker risk-based screening algorithm for future prostate cancer achieves a high DR and a much lower FPR than using PSA alone, resulting in reductions in overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

摘要

目的

通过前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)以及其他标志物来确定前列腺癌筛查的性能,以年龄特异性中位数倍数(MoM)和年龄表示标志物,并评估其性能。

方法

采用前瞻性巢式病例对照研究,使用 571 名死于前列腺癌或有前列腺癌病史的男性(病例)以及 2169 名匹配对照者的储存血清。测量总前列腺特异性抗原、游离前列腺特异性抗原、人激肽释放酶相关肽 2(hK2)和微精囊蛋白,并将其转换为 MoM 值。在病例和对照者中估计筛查标记物分布参数。蒙特卡罗模拟使用这些参数在基于风险的算法中估计筛查性能(检出率[DR]和假阳性率[FPR])。

结果

几乎所有(99%)病例发生于年龄≥55 岁的男性。发生和未发生前列腺癌死亡的病例之间的标志物值相似。结合年龄、总前列腺特异性抗原和 hK2 MoM 值(其他标志物增加的差异不大或无差异),在采集血液后 5 年内死于或诊断为前列腺癌的男性中,得出 1.2%的 FPR(95%CI 0.2-4.8%)和 90%的 DR(59-98%)(风险截止值为 1/20),比使用 ng/ml 单位测量的总前列腺特异性抗原进行同样的 90%DR(截止值为 3.1ng/ml)的 FPR 低 2/3。10 年内的筛查性能得出 33%(22-46%)的 FPR 和 90%的 DR。

结论

从 55 岁起每 5 年使用多标记物基于风险的筛查算法筛查前列腺癌,可获得较高的 DR 和较低的 FPR,与单独使用 PSA 相比,可降低过度诊断和过度治疗的风险。

相似文献

1
Multi-marker risk-based screening for prostate cancer.多标志物风险筛查前列腺癌。
J Med Screen. 2022 Jun;29(2):123-133. doi: 10.1177/09691413221076415. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
2
Impact of recent screening on predicting the outcome of prostate cancer biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden.近期筛查对预测前列腺特异性抗原升高男性前列腺癌活检结果的影响:来自瑞典哥德堡欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究的数据。
Cancer. 2010 Jun 1;116(11):2612-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25010.
3
A Four-kallikrein Panel and β-Microseminoprotein in Predicting High-grade Prostate Cancer on Biopsy: An Independent Replication from the Finnish Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.四激肽酶 panel 和 β-微 Seminoprotein 在前列腺穿刺活检预测高级别前列腺癌中的应用:芬兰参与的欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究的独立验证。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jul;5(4):561-567. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
4
A four-kallikrein panel predicts prostate cancer in men with recent screening: data from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Rotterdam.四激肽原panel 预测近期筛查男性前列腺癌:来自欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究,鹿特丹。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Jun 15;16(12):3232-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0122. Epub 2010 Apr 16.
5
In prostatism patients the ratio of human glandular kallikrein to free PSA improves the discrimination between prostate cancer and benign hyperplasia within the diagnostic "gray zone" of total PSA 4 to 10 ng/mL.在前列腺增生患者中,人腺体激肽释放酶与游离前列腺特异抗原的比值在总前列腺特异抗原4至10 ng/mL的诊断“灰色地带”内提高了前列腺癌与良性前列腺增生之间的鉴别能力。
Urology. 1998 Sep;52(3):360-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00245-3.
6
Early detection of prostate cancer in African-American men through use of multiple biomarkers: human kallikrein 2 (hK2), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and free PSA (fPSA).通过使用多种生物标志物(人激肽释放酶2(hK2)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和游离PSA(fPSA))对非裔美国男性前列腺癌进行早期检测。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2004;7(2):132-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500706.
7
Molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen and human kallikrein 2 (hK2) in urine are not clinically useful for early detection and staging of prostate cancer.尿液中前列腺特异性抗原和人激肽释放酶2(hK2)的分子形式对前列腺癌的早期检测和分期在临床上并无用处。
Urology. 1997 Nov;50(5):715-21. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00324-5.
8
A panel of kallikrein marker predicts prostate cancer in a large, population-based cohort followed for 15 years without screening.一组 kallikrein 标志物可在未经筛查且随访 15 年的大型基于人群队列中预测前列腺癌。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Feb;20(2):255-61. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1003. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
9
Association of Baseline Prostate-Specific Antigen Level With Long-term Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Among Patients Aged 55 to 60 Years: A Secondary Analysis of a Cohort in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.55 岁至 60 岁患者中基线前列腺特异性抗原水平与长期临床显著前列腺癌诊断的相关性:前列腺、肺、结直肠和卵巢(PLCO)癌症筛查试验队列的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919284. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19284.
10
Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study.50-69 岁男性前列腺癌筛查(STHLM3):一项前瞻性基于人群的诊断研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1667-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00361-7. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review on the Cost Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Screening in Europe.系统评价欧洲前列腺癌筛查的成本效益。
Eur Urol. 2024 Nov;86(5):400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.04.036. Epub 2024 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconsidering the Trade-offs of Prostate Cancer Screening.重新审视前列腺癌筛查的权衡取舍。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 18;382(25):2465-2468. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2000250.
2
Reconsidering Prostate Cancer Mortality - The Future of PSA Screening.重新审视前列腺癌死亡率——前列腺特异性抗原筛查的未来
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1557-1563. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1914228.
3
A 16-yr Follow-up of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究的 16 年随访。
Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
4
Twenty-year Risk of Prostate Cancer Death by Midlife Prostate-specific Antigen and a Panel of Four Kallikrein Markers in a Large Population-based Cohort of Healthy Men.基于大规模健康男性人群队列,通过中年前列腺特异性抗原和一组四种激肽释放酶标志物预测前列腺癌死亡的20年风险
Eur Urol. 2018 Jun;73(6):941-948. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
5
Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial.基于低强度前列腺特异性抗原的筛查干预对前列腺癌死亡率的影响:CAP随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):883-895. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0154.
6
Extended mortality results for prostate cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median follow-up of 15 years.PLCO试验中前列腺癌筛查的延长死亡率结果,中位随访时间为15年。
Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;123(4):592-599. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30474. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
7
Design-corrected variation by centre in mortality reduction in the ERSPC randomised prostate cancer screening trial.欧洲随机前列腺癌筛查试验(ERSPC)中按中心划分的设计校正后死亡率降低的变异情况。
J Med Screen. 2017 Jun;24(2):98-103. doi: 10.1177/0969141316652174. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
8
A multi-institutional prospective trial in the USA confirms that the 4Kscore accurately identifies men with high-grade prostate cancer.美国的一项多机构前瞻性试验证实,4Kscore 能准确识别出患有高级别前列腺癌的男性。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Is the area under an ROC curve a valid measure of the performance of a screening or diagnostic test?ROC 曲线下面积是否可作为筛查或诊断试验性能的有效衡量指标?
J Med Screen. 2014 Mar;21(1):51-6. doi: 10.1177/0969141313517497. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
10
Improvements in antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.唐氏综合征产前筛查的改进。
J Med Screen. 2013 Mar;20(1):7-14. doi: 10.1177/0969141313476496. Epub 2013 May 13.