Ray Tui, Gaire Tara Nath, Dean Christopher J, Rowe Sam, Godden Sandra M, Noyes Noelle R
Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 55108, USA.
Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, 2570, Australia.
Anim Microbiome. 2022 Mar 7;4(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00171-2.
Bovine mastitis is one of the most economically important diseases affecting dairy cows. The choice of bedding material has been identified as an important risk factor contributing to the development of mastitis. However, few reports examine both the culturable and nonculturable microbial composition of commonly used bedding materials, i.e., the microbiome. Given the prevalence of nonculturable microbes in most environments, this information could be an important step to understanding whether and how the bedding microbiome acts as a risk factor for mastitis. Therefore, our objective was to characterize the microbiome composition and diversity of bedding material microbiomes, before and after use.
We collected 88 bedding samples from 44 dairy farms in the U.S. Unused (from storage pile) and used (out of stalls) bedding materials were collected from four bedding types: new sand (NSA), recycled manure solids (RMS), organic non-manure (ON) and recycled sand (RSA). Samples were analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing of the V3-V4 region.
The overall composition as well as the counts of several microbial taxa differed between bedding types, with Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes dominating across all types. Used bedding contained a significantly different microbial composition than unused bedding, but the magnitude of this difference varied by bedding type, with RMS bedding exhibiting the smallest difference. In addition, positive correlations were observed between 16S rRNA sequence counts of potential mastitis pathogens (bacterial genera) and corresponding bedding bacterial culture data.
Our results strengthen the role of bedding as a potential source of mastitis pathogens. The consistent shift in the microbiome of all bedding types that occurred during use by dairy cows deserves further investigation to understand whether this shift promotes pathogen colonization and/or persistence, or whether it can differentially impact udder health outcomes. Future studies of bedding and udder health may be strengthened by including a microbiome component to the study design.
奶牛乳房炎是影响奶牛养殖经济效益最为严重的疾病之一。垫料的选择已被确认为引发乳房炎的一个重要风险因素。然而,很少有报告同时研究常用垫料的可培养和不可培养微生物组成,即微生物群落。鉴于大多数环境中不可培养微生物的普遍存在,这些信息对于理解垫料微生物群落是否以及如何成为乳房炎的风险因素至关重要。因此,我们的目标是表征垫料在使用前后的微生物群落组成和多样性。
我们从美国44个奶牛场收集了88份垫料样本。从未使用过的(来自储存堆)和已使用过的(牛舍外)垫料样本取自四种垫料类型:新沙子(NSA)、回收粪肥固体(RMS)、有机非粪肥(ON)和回收沙子(RSA)。使用V3-V4区域的16S rRNA测序对样本进行分析。
不同垫料类型之间的总体组成以及几种微生物类群的数量存在差异,所有类型中变形菌门、放线菌门、拟杆菌门和厚壁菌门占主导。已使用的垫料与未使用的垫料相比,微生物组成有显著差异,但这种差异的程度因垫料类型而异,RMS垫料的差异最小。此外,观察到潜在乳房炎病原体(细菌属)的(16S rRNA序列计数)与相应垫料细菌培养数据之间存在正相关。
我们的结果强化了垫料作为乳房炎病原体潜在来源的作用。奶牛使用期间所有垫料类型的微生物群落都发生了一致的变化,这值得进一步研究,以了解这种变化是否促进病原体定植和/或持续存在,或者是否会对乳房健康结果产生不同影响。未来关于垫料和乳房健康的研究可能通过在研究设计中纳入微生物群落成分而得到加强。