Warren Alex, McCarthy Ciana, Andiapen Mervyn, Crouch Margie, Finney Simon, Hamilton Simon, Jain Ajay, Jones Daniel, Proudfoot Alastair
South-East Scotland School of Anaesthesia, Edinburgh, UK; Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2022 May;128(5):849-856. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.052. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
Quantitative pupillometry is recommended for neuroprognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest 72 h or more after ICU admission, but the feasibility and utility of earlier assessment is unknown.
This was a study of the utility of an early quantitative pupillometry index in predicting neurological outcome in patients with reduced consciousness after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Quantitative infrared pupillometry index was measured at 0, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h from admission. Acceptable predictive utility was defined as a positive predictive value of >95% and false positive rate of zero, with a narrow 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
At least one quantitative pupillometry index measurement was available from within the first 6 h for all 77 patients who met inclusion criteria. A quantitative pupillometry index ≤2.4 at baseline and ≤2.3 within the first 6 h met the criteria for utility. The positive predictive value of the baseline cut-off (≤2.4) for poor neurological outcome was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.54-1.00) with an estimated false positive rate of 0% (95% CI, 0-9%). The positive predictive value of the 6 h cut-off (≤2.3) for poor neurological outcome was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.59-1.00) with an estimated false positive rate of 0% (95% CI, 0-8%). Sensitivities of these cut-offs for ruling out poor neurological outcomes at 0 and 6 h were 19% and 22%, respectively. Of seven patients with a quantitative pupillometry index ≤2.3 within 6 h of ICU admission, none survived. Analyses that used quantitative pupillometry index measurements from 24 to 72 h, but excluded baseline and 6 h values, were not predictive by the utility criteria.
Quantitative pupillometry within 6 h of ICU admission after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest may identify patients with a very low chance of neurologically intact survival. Further studies of early quantitative pupillometry in this population are warranted.
建议在重症监护病房(ICU)入院72小时或更长时间后,对院外心脏骤停患者进行定量瞳孔测量以进行神经预后评估,但早期评估的可行性和实用性尚不清楚。
本研究旨在探讨早期定量瞳孔测量指数对院外心脏骤停后意识减退患者神经预后的预测作用。入院后0、6、24、48和72小时测量定量红外瞳孔测量指数。可接受的预测效用定义为阳性预测值>95%,假阳性率为零,95%置信区间(95%CI)狭窄。
所有77例符合纳入标准的患者在入院后6小时内至少进行了一次定量瞳孔测量指数测量。基线时定量瞳孔测量指数≤2.4且在最初6小时内≤2.3符合效用标准。基线临界值(≤2.4)对不良神经预后的阳性预测值为1.00(95%CI,0.54-1.00),估计假阳性率为0%(95%CI,0-9%)。6小时临界值(≤2.3)对不良神经预后的阳性预测值为1.00(95%CI,0.59-1.00),估计假阳性率为0%(95%CI,0-8%)。这些临界值在0小时和6小时排除不良神经预后的敏感性分别为19%和22%。在ICU入院6小时内定量瞳孔测量指数≤2.3的7例患者中,无一存活。使用24至72小时的定量瞳孔测量指数测量值但排除基线和6小时值的分析不符合效用标准的预测。
院外心脏骤停后ICU入院6小时内进行定量瞳孔测量可能识别出神经功能完整存活机会极低的患者。有必要对该人群进行早期定量瞳孔测量的进一步研究。