El Sharouni Mary-Ann, Scolyer Richard A, van Gils Carla H, Ch'ng Sydney, Nieweg Omgo E, Pennington Thomas E, Saw Robyn P M, Shannon Kerwin, Spillane Andrew, Stretch Jonathan, Witkamp Arjen J, Sigurdsson Vigfús, Thompson John F, van Diest Paul J, Lo Serigne N
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Eur J Cancer. 2022 May;167:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.035. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
The optimal time interval between diagnostic excision of a primary cutaneous melanoma and sentinel node (SN) biopsy is unknown. The current study sought to determine whether this interval influenced the SN-positivity rate, recurrence or survival.
Data collected from 2004 to 2014 for a Dutch population-based cohort of patients with melanoma who underwent SN biopsy (SNB) within 100 days of initial diagnosis (n = 7660) and for a similarly specified cohort from a large Australian melanoma treatment centre (n = 3478) were analysed. Time to SNB was analysed continuously (in weeks) and categorically (per month). The effects of SNB timing on SN-positivity were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, and its effects on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Advanced modelling using a multivariable Cox model with penalised splines for modelling the continuous effects of time to SNB on RFS and OS was also performed.
In neither the Dutch nor the Australian cohort was there a significant association between time to SNB and SN-positivity in either cohort, nor was there an impact of time to SNB on RFS or OS in either cohort. The spline-based HR curves for RFS and OS confirmed these findings.
The time interval between diagnostic excision of a primary melanoma and SNB did not influence the SN-positivity rate or survival outcomes. This provides reassurance that neither early nor delayed definitive wide excision and SNB will adversely affect prognosis.
原发性皮肤黑色素瘤诊断性切除与前哨淋巴结活检之间的最佳时间间隔尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定该间隔是否会影响前哨淋巴结阳性率、复发或生存率。
分析了2004年至2014年期间荷兰基于人群的黑色素瘤患者队列(在初始诊断后100天内接受前哨淋巴结活检,n = 7660)以及澳大利亚一个大型黑色素瘤治疗中心类似指定队列(n = 3478)的数据。对前哨淋巴结活检时间进行连续分析(以周为单位)和分类分析(按月)。使用多变量逻辑回归评估前哨淋巴结活检时间对前哨淋巴结阳性的影响,并使用Cox比例风险回归分析评估其对无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。还使用带有惩罚样条的多变量Cox模型进行高级建模,以模拟前哨淋巴结活检时间对RFS和OS的连续影响。
在荷兰队列和澳大利亚队列中,前哨淋巴结活检时间与前哨淋巴结阳性之间均无显著关联,且前哨淋巴结活检时间对两个队列的RFS或OS均无影响。RFS和OS的基于样条的HR曲线证实了这些发现。
原发性黑色素瘤诊断性切除与前哨淋巴结活检之间的时间间隔不会影响前哨淋巴结阳性率或生存结果。这让人放心,早期或延迟的确定性广泛切除和前哨淋巴结活检均不会对预后产生不利影响。