Fundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Área de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Sevilla, Spain.
Grupo de Investigación (HUM604). Desarrollo de estilos de vida en el ciclo vital y promoción de la salud. Universidad de Huelva, Huelva, Spain.
Psychol Med. 2022 Apr;52(6):1001-1013. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722000071. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
Postpartum depression (PPD) is one of the most common disorders following childbirth. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) aimed to assess the effectiveness of psychological interventions in preventing PPD in non-depressed women. PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed), PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, CENTRAL, OpenGrey, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry and clinicaltrial.gov were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted with pregnant or postpartum (up to 12 months) women who were non-depressed at baseline were selected. The outcomes were the incidence of PPD and/or the reduction of postpartum depressive symptoms. The standardized mean difference (SMD) using random-effect models was calculated. Sensitivity, sub-group and meta-regression analyses were performed. 17 RCTs were included in the SR and 15 in the MA, representing 4958 participants from four continents. The pooled SMD was -0.175 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.266 to -0.083; < 0.001] and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of this result. Heterogeneity was low (2 = 21.20%) and was fully explained by a meta-regression model including one variable (previous deliveries). The meta-regression model and MA stratified by previous deliveries indicated that interventions focused on primiparous women are more effective. There was no evidence of publication bias. Few RCTs had an overall low risk of bias. According to GRADE, the quality of evidence was moderate. Psychological interventions have very little effectiveness in preventing PPD in non-depressed women, although this effectiveness is greater in interventions focused on primiparous women. Further RCTs with a low risk of bias and more effective interventions are needed.
产后抑郁症(PPD)是分娩后最常见的疾病之一。本系统评价和荟萃分析(SR/MA)旨在评估心理干预措施预防非抑郁产后妇女 PPD 的有效性。遵循 PRISMA 指南。检索了 MEDLINE(Ovid 和 PubMed)、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Scopus、CINAHL、CENTRAL、OpenGrey、澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册处和 clinicaltrial.gov。选择了在基线时非抑郁的孕妇或产后(最多 12 个月)妇女进行的随机对照试验(RCT)。结局是 PPD 的发生率和/或产后抑郁症状的减轻。使用随机效应模型计算标准化均数差(SMD)。进行了敏感性、亚组和荟萃回归分析。SR 纳入了 17 项 RCT,MA 纳入了 15 项 RCT,共纳入了来自四大洲的 4958 名参与者。汇总的 SMD 为-0.175[95%置信区间(CI)-0.266 至-0.083;<0.001],敏感性分析证实了这一结果的稳健性。异质性较低(2=21.20%),且完全由一个包含一个变量(既往分娩)的荟萃回归模型解释。包括既往分娩在内的 meta 回归模型和 MA 分层表明,针对初产妇的干预措施更为有效。没有发表偏倚的证据。少数 RCT 的整体偏倚风险较低。根据 GRADE,证据质量为中级。心理干预措施对预防非抑郁产后妇女的 PPD 几乎没有效果,尽管针对初产妇的干预措施效果更大。需要进一步开展低偏倚风险和更有效的 RCT。