Impaction Grafting Is Sufficient to Address Acetabular Deficiency During Total Hip Arthroplasty of Most Dysplastic Hips With Over 30% Bone Defect.

BACKGROUND

Addressing acetabular deficiency during arthroplasty of dysplastic hips is challenging. We assessed outcomes of a protocol for choosing either impaction or structural graft for this purpose.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 59 patients (71 hips) with a dysplastic hip and over 30% uncoverage that underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty. Morselized impaction grafting was performed for hips where initial stability of the acetabular cup was achieved. In others, a shelf graft was inserted before implantation of the acetabular cup. Outcomes were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 4 years.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven (80.3%) hips underwent impaction grafting and 14 (19.7%) received a structural graft. Mean age at surgery was 48.1 ± 13.5 (18-68) years for impaction and 48.6 ± 14 (24-70) years for shelf grafts. Mean increase in Harris Hip Score was 51.5 ± 9.3 and 50 ± 11.2 for the impaction and structural groups, respectively, at a mean follow-up of 92 (49-136) months (P = .6). Heterotopic ossification occurred in 16 patients in the impaction group vs none in the structural group (P = .004). Radiologically, mean percentages of cup coverage provided by the graft were 47.8 ± 10.9% and 48.9 ± 13.3% in the impaction and structural groups, respectively (P = .75). All but one of shelf grafts united to host bone and all impaction grafts incorporated. There was one case of cup loosening in the structural graft group.

CONCLUSION

Most dysplastic acetabula with over 30% defect can be addressed using a cementless cup and impaction grafting, with good results in the midterm. In about 20% of cases, initial press-fit is not attainable and structural support-like shelf graft becomes necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.