Department of Physical Therapy, Center of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of São Carlos, Washington Luiz Road, km 235, SP310, São Carlos, São Paulo 13565-905, Brazil.
Rural Department of Allied Health, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC 3660, Australia.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022 Jul;30(7):935-944. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
This systematic review investigated whether people with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) have muscle strength, volume, and activation around the hip and knee that is different from asymptomatic controls.
Searches were carried out in five electronic databases, with terms related to PFOA, including muscle strength, volume and activation. Only studies with at least one group with symptomatic PFOA and one asymptomatic group were included. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Downs and Black checklist. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Using the random effects model, a meta-analysis was performed when there were at least two studies reporting the same domain.
Eight studies (250 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Subjects with PFOA had weaker hip abduction (SMD -0.96; 95%CI = -1.34 to -0.57), hip external rotation (-0.55;-1.07 to -0.03), hip extension (-0.72;-1.16 to -0.28), and knee extension (-0.97;-1.41 to -0.53) when compared to asymptomatic controls. People with PFOA also presented with smaller volumes of the gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, tensor fascia lata, vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris when compared to asymptomatic controls. Also, people with PFOA presented with changes in muscle activation for the VL, VM and gluteus maximus (GMax) when compared to asymptomatic controls.
People with PFOA present with lower strength and volume of the hip and quadriceps muscles and altered muscle activation of the VM, VL and GMax during ascending and descending stairs when compared to asymptomatic controls. However, the certainty of these findings are very low.
PROSPERO systematic review protocol (ID = CRD42020197776).
本系统评价研究了髌股关节骨关节炎(PFOA)患者的髋关节和膝关节周围肌肉力量、肌肉量和肌肉激活情况是否与无症状对照者不同。
在五个电子数据库中进行了检索,检索词与 PFOA 相关,包括肌肉力量、肌肉量和肌肉激活。仅纳入至少有一组有症状的 PFOA 和一组无症状的患者的研究。使用 Downs 和 Black 清单评估研究的方法学质量。使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。当有至少两项研究报告同一领域时,使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
八项研究(250 名参与者)符合纳入标准。与无症状对照组相比,PFOA 患者的髋关节外展(SMD -0.96;95%CI=-1.34 至-0.57)、髋关节外旋(-0.55;-1.07 至-0.03)、髋关节伸展(-0.72;-1.16 至-0.28)和膝关节伸展(-0.97;-1.41 至-0.53)力量较弱。与无症状对照组相比,PFOA 患者的臀中肌、臀小肌、阔筋膜张肌、股直肌(VM)、股外侧肌(VL)和股四头肌体积较小。此外,与无症状对照组相比,PFOA 患者的 VL、VM 和臀大肌(GMax)的肌肉激活也发生了变化。
与无症状对照组相比,PFOA 患者在上、下楼梯时髋关节和股四头肌力量和体积较低,股直肌、股外侧肌和臀大肌的肌肉激活发生改变。然而,这些发现的确定性非常低。
PROSPERO 系统评价方案(ID=CRD42020197776)。