• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于Meta分析的不同生产条件下秸秆还田对土壤氨挥发的影响

[Effects of Straw Returning on Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Different Production Conditions Based on Meta-analysis].

作者信息

Zhao Zheng-Xin, Wang Xiao-Yun, Tian Ya-Jie, Wang Rui, Peng Qing, Cai Huan-Jie

机构信息

College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.

Institute of Water-saving Agriculture in Arid Areas of China, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Mar 8;43(3):1678-1687. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202107086.

DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202107086
PMID:35258232
Abstract

In order to explore the response of Chinese farmland soil ammonia volatilization to straw returning to the field under different production conditions, this study used no straw returning as a control. Through the collection of published literature test data, the Meta-analysis method was used to quantitatively study the effects of different natural factors and, under the conditions of farmland management measures, the effect of returning straw to the field on the emission reduction of soil ammonia volatilization. At the same time, through partial correlation analysis, the main influencing factors of ammonia volatilization under the condition of returning straw to the field were found, and the ammonia volatilization was quantified. The results showed that the effect of straw returning on soil ammonia volatilization decreased with the increase in accumulated rainfall during the growth period and increased with the increase in average temperature during the growth period. When the soil pH was less than 6, straw returning to the field significantly promoted soil ammonia volatilization, and when the pH was ≥ 6, returning straw to the field significantly inhibited ammonia volatilization in the soil. The reduction effect of returning straw to the field on soil ammonia volatilization increased with the increase in soil clay content. When the total soil nitrogen content was <0.1% and >0.2%, returning the straw to the field significantly inhibited the volatilization of soil ammonia, and when the total soil nitrogen content was between 0.1% and 0.2%, returning the straw to the field significantly promoted the volatilization of ammonia from the soil. When the nitrogen application rate was 60-180 kg·hm and the nitrogen application rate was >240 kg·hm, returning straw to the field significantly reduced soil ammonia volatilization (<0.05), and when nitrogen application rate was 180-240 kg·hm, returning straw to the field significantly promoted ammonia volatilization in the soil. Returning straw to the field by plowing or rotary tillage significantly inhibited ammonia volatilization in the soil, whereas returning straw to the field in a mulching mode had no significant effect on ammonia volatilization. When the straw C/N>45, it significantly inhibited ammonia volatilization from the soil, and when the straw C/N ≤ 45, the straw returning to the field significantly promoted the ammonia volatilization of the soil. The reduction effect of straw returning on ammonia volatilization increased with the increase in straw-returning amount. In non-paddy fields, returning straw to the field had a significant inhibitory effect on soil ammonia volatilization, and in paddy fields, returning straw to the field had a significant effect on soil ammonia volatilization. The results of partial correlation analysis showed that in paddy fields, the average growth period and soil pH were the main factors affecting soil ammonia volatilization under the condition of returning straw to the field, and in non-paddy fields, nitrogen application rate and straw C/N were the main factors affecting the conditions. This study can provide reference for the scientific and rational use of straw to achieve ammonia volatilization emission reduction in farmland.

摘要

为探究不同生产条件下中国农田土壤氨挥发对秸秆还田的响应,本研究以不进行秸秆还田作为对照。通过收集已发表文献的试验数据,采用Meta分析方法定量研究了不同自然因素以及农田管理措施条件下秸秆还田对土壤氨挥发减排的影响。同时,通过偏相关分析找出秸秆还田条件下氨挥发的主要影响因素,并对氨挥发进行量化。结果表明,秸秆还田对土壤氨挥发的影响随生育期累积降雨量的增加而降低,随生育期平均温度的升高而增加。当土壤pH小于6时,秸秆还田显著促进土壤氨挥发,当pH≥6时,秸秆还田显著抑制土壤氨挥发。秸秆还田对土壤氨挥发的减排效果随土壤黏粒含量的增加而增大。当土壤全氮含量<0.1%和>0.2%时,秸秆还田显著抑制土壤氨挥发,当土壤全氮含量在0.1%0.2%之间时,秸秆还田显著促进土壤氨挥发。当施氮量为60180 kg·hm 且施氮量>240 kg·hm 时,秸秆还田显著降低土壤氨挥发(<0.05),当施氮量为180~240 kg·hm 时,秸秆还田显著促进土壤氨挥发。翻耕或旋耕秸秆还田显著抑制土壤氨挥发,而覆盖模式秸秆还田对氨挥发无显著影响。当秸秆C/N>45时,显著抑制土壤氨挥发,当秸秆C/N≤45时,秸秆还田显著促进土壤氨挥发。秸秆还田对氨挥发的减排效果随秸秆还田量的增加而增大。在非稻田中,秸秆还田对土壤氨挥发有显著抑制作用,在稻田中,秸秆还田对土壤氨挥发有显著影响。偏相关分析结果表明,在稻田中,生育期平均温度和土壤pH是秸秆还田条件下影响土壤氨挥发的主要因素,在非稻田中,施氮量和秸秆C/N是影响该条件的主要因素。本研究可为科学合理利用秸秆实现农田氨挥发减排提供参考。

相似文献

1
[Effects of Straw Returning on Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Different Production Conditions Based on Meta-analysis].基于Meta分析的不同生产条件下秸秆还田对土壤氨挥发的影响
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Mar 8;43(3):1678-1687. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202107086.
2
[Comparing the ammonia volatilization characteristic of two typical paddy soil with total wheat straw returning in Taihu Lake region].[太湖地区两种典型水稻土全量麦秸还田氨挥发特征比较]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013 Jan;34(1):27-33.
3
[Effect of Straw Incorporation and Domestic Sewage Irrigation on Ammonia Volatilization from Paddy Fields].秸秆还田与生活污水灌溉对稻田氨挥发的影响
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2016 Oct 8;37(10):3963-3970. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2016.10.039.
4
Differences in responses of ammonia volatilization and greenhouse gas emissions to straw return and paddy-upland rotations.秸秆还田和稻旱轮作对氨挥发和温室气体排放响应的差异。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(17):25296-25307. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17239-2. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
5
Comparing ammonia volatilization between conventional and slow-release nitrogen fertilizers in paddy fields in the Taihu Lake region.比较太湖地区稻田中常规氮肥和缓释氮肥的氨挥发。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(8):8386-8394. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07536-2. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
6
[Effects of Wheat Straw Hydrochar and Its Modified Product on Rice Yield and Ammonia Volatilization from Paddy Fields].[小麦秸秆生物炭及其改性产物对水稻产量和稻田氨挥发的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Jul 8;42(7):3451-3457. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202010086.
7
Reducing ammonia volatilization from paddy field with rice straw derived biochar.利用水稻秸秆生物炭减少稻田氨挥发。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.450. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
8
[Effect of reed-biochar application on ammonia volatilization from different types of soils].芦苇生物炭施用对不同类型土壤氨挥发的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Jul;33(7):1919-1926. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202207.031.
9
[Emission Characteristics, Transformation Mechanism, and Reduction Potential of Ammonia Emissions from a Crop Rotation System in Yangtze River Delta].[长江三角洲地区作物轮作系统氨排放特征、转化机制及减排潜力]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Feb 8;43(2):1108-1128. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202105291.
10
[Effects of different amounts of straw return and nitrogen fertilizer application on soil CO emission from maize fields].不同秸秆还田量与施氮量对玉米田土壤CO排放的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Mar;33(3):664-670. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202203.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Chinese Herbal Extracts Mitigate Ammonia Generation in the Cecum of Laying Hens: An In Vitro Study.中草药提取物减轻蛋鸡盲肠中氨的生成:一项体外研究
Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 20;13(18):2969. doi: 10.3390/ani13182969.