Suppr超能文献

俄罗斯水痘疫苗全民接种的成本效果和预算影响。

Cost effectiveness and budget impact of universal varicella vaccination in Russia.

机构信息

GSK, Wavre, Belgium.

GSK, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2045152. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2045152. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

Abstract

This economic evaluation assesses the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of introducing a two-dose varicella vaccine in the Russian national immunization program. A static Markov model followed a simulated 2019 Russian cohort over its lifetime and compared outcomes and costs of three varicella vaccination strategies: strategy I (doses given at 12 and 15 months of age), strategy II (doses given at 1 year and 6 years of age), and a no vaccination scenario. Inputs on age-dependent clinical pathways, associated costs, and related health outcomes were collected from national sources and published literature. Results are presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the healthcare payer and societal perspective over the lifetime of the birth cohort and the budget impact over a 10 years' time horizon. Vaccination strategies I and II resulted in an ICER of approximately 1.7 million rubles per quality-adjusted life years gained from the healthcare payer perspective and were cost-saving from the societal perspective. From the healthcare payer perspective, the costs per varicella case averted were 5,989 and 7,140 rubles per case for strategies I and II, respectively. However, from the societal perspective, vaccination is a dominant strategy and the budget impact analysis shows significant healthcare savings over 10 years, with strategy I realizing savings of ~2 billion rubles more than strategy II. From a public health impact perspective, varicella vaccination of children at 12 and 15 months of age through the Russian NIP is expected to be cost-effective with an affordable budget impact compared to no vaccination.

摘要

本经济评估旨在评估在俄罗斯国家免疫计划中引入两剂水痘疫苗的成本效益和预算影响。一个静态的马尔可夫模型对 2019 年俄罗斯队列进行了终生模拟,并比较了三种水痘疫苗接种策略的结果和成本:策略 I(12 个月和 15 个月时接种)、策略 II(1 岁和 6 岁时接种)和不接种疫苗的情况。关于年龄相关临床途径、相关成本和相关健康结果的投入是从国家来源和已发表的文献中收集的。结果以增量成本效益比(从医疗保健支付方和社会角度来看,在出生队列的整个生命周期内)和在 10 年时间范围内的预算影响呈现。从医疗保健支付方的角度来看,策略 I 和 II 每获得一个质量调整生命年的增量成本效益比约为 170 万卢布,从社会角度来看则具有成本效益。从医疗保健支付方的角度来看,每例水痘病例避免的成本分别为策略 I 和 II 的 5989 卢布和 7140 卢布。然而,从社会角度来看,接种疫苗是一种主导策略,预算影响分析表明在 10 年内可节省大量医疗费用,策略 I 比策略 II 节省了约 20 亿卢布。从公共卫生影响的角度来看,通过俄罗斯国家免疫计划在 12 个月和 15 个月大的儿童中接种水痘疫苗,预计在可承受的预算影响下具有成本效益,与不接种疫苗相比。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1bc/9196720/78d6f0469a66/KHVI_A_2045152_UF0001_OC.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验