Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Imaging, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug;32(8):5642-5649. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08641-6. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
We aimed to validate a 2D radial T2* mapping method and its ability to reveal subtle alterations in the menisci of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Of 40 enrolled participants, 20 were diagnosed with OA, and 20 were age- and sex-matched asymptomatic controls. Data from the right knee of each participant were collected using a 1.5-T MRI equipped with a single-channel knee coil. T2* values were acquired using a conventional T2* mapping protocol and a radial T2* mapping method. Mean T2* values in the meniscal white zones, meniscal red zones, and total menisci were calculated. Numerical simulation was performed for validation.
Both simulation and clinical data confirmed that 2D radial T2* mapping provided better discrimination than the conventional method. Compared to controls, the OA group showed significantly greater mean (standard deviation) T2* values in the white zones (9.33 [2.29] ms vs. 6.04 [1.05] ms), red zones (9.18 [2.03] ms vs. 6.81 [1.28] ms), and total menisci (9.26 [2.06] ms vs. 6.34 [1.14] ms). Correlations were found between the Lequesne index and the meniscal T2* values in all three regions (r = 0.528, p = 0.017; r = 0.635, p = 0.003; and r = 0.556, p = 0.011, respectively).
These findings indicate that in early OA, radial T2* mapping is an alternative means of assessing meniscal degeneration and can be used to monitor its progression.
• Radial T2* mapping outperforms Cartesian T2* mapping. • Radial T2* measurements are useful in assessing meniscal degeneration. • Meniscal T2* values correlate well with disease severity.
本研究旨在验证一种 2D 径向 T2*映射方法,并评估其在膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者半月板细微改变中的应用价值。
共纳入 40 名研究对象,其中 20 名为 OA 患者,20 名为年龄和性别匹配的无症状对照者。所有研究对象均接受了配备单通道膝关节线圈的 1.5T MRI 右膝关节扫描。采用常规 T2* 映射方案和径向 T2* 映射方法获取 T2* 值。计算半月板白区、红区和全半月板的平均 T2* 值。为验证方法,我们还进行了数值模拟。
数值模拟和临床数据均证实,2D 径向 T2* 映射较常规方法具有更好的区分度。与对照组相比,OA 组的白区(9.33 [2.29] ms 比 6.04 [1.05] ms)、红区(9.18 [2.03] ms 比 6.81 [1.28] ms)和全半月板(9.26 [2.06] ms 比 6.34 [1.14] ms)的平均 T2* 值均显著升高。所有三个区域的半月板 T2* 值均与 Lequesne 指数呈正相关(r = 0.528,p = 0.017;r = 0.635,p = 0.003;r = 0.556,p = 0.011)。
在早期 OA 中,径向 T2* 映射是评估半月板退变的一种替代方法,可用于监测其进展。
径向 T2* 映射优于笛卡尔 T2* 映射。
径向 T2* 测量值可用于评估半月板退变。
半月板 T2* 值与疾病严重程度密切相关。