CREAGEN Research Center of Environmental, Genetic and Nutritional Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
CREAGEN Research Center of Environmental, Genetic and Nutritional Epidemiology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Environ Res. 2022 Aug;211:113092. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113092. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
Recent evidence from laboratory and epidemiologic studies has shed a different light on selenium health effects and its recommended range of environmental exposure, compared with earlier research. Specifically, epidemiologic studies in Western populations have shown adverse effects of selenium exposure at low levels, sometimes below or slightly above selenium intakes needed to maximize selenoprotein expression and activity. In addition, three recent lines of evidence in molecular and biochemical studies suggest some potential drawbacks associated with selenoprotein maximization: 1) the possibility that selenoprotein upregulation is a compensatory response to oxidative challenge, induced by selenium itself or other oxidants; 2) the capacity of selenoproteins to trigger tumor growth in some circumstances; and 3) the deleterious metabolic effects of selenoproteins and particularly of selenoprotein P. The last observation provides a toxicological basis to explain why in humans selenium intake levels as low as 60 μg/day, still in the range of selenium exposure upregulating selenoprotein expression, might start to increase risk of type 2 diabetes. Overall, these new pieces of evidence from the literature call into question the purported benefit of selenoprotein maximization, and indicate the need to reassess selenium dietary reference values and upper intake level. This reassessment should clarify which range of selenoprotein upregulation follows restoration of adequate selenium availability and which range is driven by a compensatory response to selenium toxicity and oxidative stress.
最近的实验室和流行病学研究证据,与早期研究相比,对硒的健康影响及其建议的环境暴露范围有了不同的认识。具体而言,西方人群的流行病学研究表明,在低水平暴露于硒时会产生不良影响,有时甚至低于或略高于最大限度表达和发挥硒蛋白活性所需的硒摄入量。此外,分子和生化研究中的三条最新证据线表明,与最大限度发挥硒蛋白作用相关的一些潜在缺点:1)硒蛋白的上调可能是由硒本身或其他氧化剂引起的氧化应激的补偿性反应;2)在某些情况下,硒蛋白具有引发肿瘤生长的能力;3)硒蛋白,尤其是硒蛋白 P 的有害代谢作用。最后一个观察结果为解释为什么人类每天摄入 60μg 的硒,仍然在硒能上调硒蛋白表达的范围内,可能会开始增加患 2 型糖尿病的风险提供了一个毒理学基础。总的来说,这些文献中的新证据对硒蛋白最大化的所谓益处提出了质疑,并表明需要重新评估硒的膳食参考值和最高摄入量。这种重新评估应该阐明,哪种硒蛋白上调范围是在恢复足够的硒供应的情况下发生的,哪种范围是由硒毒性和氧化应激的补偿性反应驱动的。