Vocational School of Health Services, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 Aug 3;39(8):1753-1761. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2048425. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
The Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (Revised-NPQ-Tr) is used to evaluate the change in pain knowledge. No study has explored its validity and reliability for the Turkish language.
This study aims to determine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Revised-NPQ-Tr in chronic spinal pain patients.
A total of 182 chronic spinal pain patients were included in the study. The Revised-NPQ-Tr results were analyzed using Rasch analysis to measure the psychometric properties.
The Revised-NPQ-Tr indicates misfit to the Rasch model, as evidenced by the borderline significant value (LR test = 27.626; df = 11; = .004; Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.004). Two items were differentially affected by educational status. Removal of poor-functioning items did not improve the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. The Revised-NPQ-Tr is unidimensional and there was no local dependence between items. The questionnaire exhibits known group validity. Test-retest reliability of the questionnaire was moderate [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.629]; however, the internal consistency of the questionnaire was found to be low (Cronbach's α = 0.330; person separation index = 0.373).
Although the internal validity of the Revised-NPQ-Tr version was acceptable, its reliability was found to be low. Consequently, the results of Revised-NPQ-Tr should be interpreted carefully in the clinic.
修订后的神经生理学疼痛问卷(Revised-NPQ-Tr)用于评估疼痛知识的变化。目前尚无研究探讨其在土耳其语中的有效性和可靠性。
本研究旨在确定慢性脊柱疼痛患者土耳其语修订版修订后的神经生理学疼痛问卷(Revised-NPQ-Tr)的心理测量特性。
共纳入 182 例慢性脊柱疼痛患者。使用 Rasch 分析对 Revised-NPQ-Tr 结果进行分析,以测量心理测量特性。
Revised-NPQ-Tr 显示与 Rasch 模型不匹配,证据为边界显著值(LR 检验=27.626;df=11;=0.004;Bonferroni 校正后的 α=0.004)。两个项目受到教育程度的不同影响。删除功能不良项目并不能改善问卷的心理测量特性。Revised-NPQ-Tr 是单维的,项目之间没有局部依赖性。问卷具有已知组有效性。问卷的重测信度为中度(组内相关系数 ICC=0.629);然而,问卷的内部一致性被发现较低(Cronbach 的 α=0.330;个体分离指数=0.373)。
尽管 Revised-NPQ-Tr 版本的内部有效性可以接受,但可靠性较低。因此,在临床实践中应谨慎解释 Revised-NPQ-Tr 的结果。