土耳其语版医护人员疼痛与功能障碍关系量表:信度和效度。

Turkish version of health care providers' pain and impairment relationship scale: Reliability and validity.

机构信息

Kutahya Health Sciences University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Kutahya, Turkey.

Kutahya Health Sciences University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Kutahya, Turkey.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Jun;53:102367. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102367. Epub 2021 Mar 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop the Turkish version of the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS-TR) by conducting the linguistic and cultural adaptation and to examine the psychometric properties and reliability of the adapted version.

METHODS

A double back-translation procedure was used to translate the questionnaire. Participants received an online survey package with the HC-PAIRS-TR, the Turkish version of Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT-TR), and Turkish Version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-TR). Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item analysis were used to evaluate internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch Analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The study was conducted with 153 physiotherapists practicing in Turkey. Cronbach's alpha was 0.81. Test-retest reliability was high (ICC = 0.85, p < 0.001), the standard error of measurement was 4.96 (0.94% of mean), and minimal detectable change was 13.75 (26.06% of mean). HC-PAIRS-TR scores correlated significantly with scores for the biomedical factor of the PABS-PT-TR (r = 0.52, p = 0.00), biopsychosocial factor of PABS-PT-TR (r = 0.32, p = 0.00), and TSK-TR (r = 0.52, p = 0.00). According to CFA and Rasch Analysis, the 12 items version of HC-PAIRS-TR fits the one-factor model excellently.

CONCLUSION

The HC-PAIRS-TR appears to be a reliable and valid questionnaire to measure Turkish physiotherapists' beliefs and attitudes about the relationship between low back pain and impairment. Future studies might be planned to validate this questionnaire for other health care providers.

摘要

目的

通过进行语言和文化适应性调整,开发土耳其版健康照护提供者的疼痛与失能关系量表(HC-PAIRS-TR),并检验改编版本的心理测量特性和信度。

方法

采用双回译程序对问卷进行翻译。参与者收到一个在线调查包,其中包括 HC-PAIRS-TR、土耳其版物理治疗师疼痛态度与信念量表(PABS-PT-TR)和土耳其版运动恐惧量表(TSK-TR)。采用克朗巴赫α系数和项目分析来评估内部一致性。采用组内相关系数(ICC)来确定测试-重测信度。进行验证性因子分析(CFA)和 Rasch 分析。

结果

本研究在土耳其的 153 名物理治疗师中进行。克朗巴赫α系数为 0.81。测试-重测信度较高(ICC=0.85,p<0.001),测量标准误差为 4.96(均值的 0.94%),最小可检测变化为 13.75(均值的 26.06%)。HC-PAIRS-TR 评分与 PABS-PT-TR 的生物医学因子(r=0.52,p=0.00)、PABS-PT-TR 的生物心理社会因子(r=0.32,p=0.00)和 TSK-TR(r=0.52,p=0.00)显著相关。根据 CFA 和 Rasch 分析,HC-PAIRS-TR 的 12 项版本非常适合单因素模型。

结论

HC-PAIRS-TR 似乎是一种可靠且有效的问卷,可以测量土耳其物理治疗师对腰痛与失能之间关系的信念和态度。未来可能会计划为其他健康照护提供者验证该问卷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索