Department of Emergency Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 55 Claverick Street, Second floor, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02860-8.
Telehealth delivery expanded quickly during the COVID-19 pandemic after the reduction of payment and regulatory barriers, but older adults are the least likely to benefit from this expansion. Little is known about physician experiences initiating telehealth and factors that fostered or discouraged adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic with older adult patients. Therefore, our objective was to understand experiences of frontline physicians caring for older adults via telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We conducted semi-structured interviews from September 2020 to November 2020 with 48 physicians. We recruited a diverse sample of geriatricians (n = 18), primary care (n = 15), and emergency (n = 15) physicians from all United Stated (US) regions, rural-urban settings, and academic-community practices who cared for older adult patients during the pandemic using purposive sampling methods. We completed framework analysis of the transcribed interviews to identify emerging themes and used the Quadruple Aim to organize themes.
Frontline physicians described telehealth as a more flexible, value-based, and patient-centered mode of health care delivery. Benefits of using telehealth to treat older adults included reducing deferred care and increasing timely care, improving efficiency for physicians, enhancing communication with caregivers and patients, reducing patient travel burdens, and facilitating health outreach and education. Challenges included unequal access for rural, older, or cognitively impaired patients. Physicians noted that payment parity with in-person visits, between video and telephone visits, and relaxation of restrictive regulations would enhance their ability to continue to offer telehealth.
Frontline physicians who treated older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic were largely in favor of continuing telehealth use beyond the pandemic; however, they noted that sustainability would depend on enacting policies that address access inequities and reimbursement concerns. Our data provide policy insights that if placed into action could facilitate the long-term success of telehealth and encourage a more flexible healthcare delivery system in the US.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,支付和监管障碍减少后,远程医疗服务迅速扩大,但老年人最不可能从中受益。对于在 COVID-19 大流行期间与老年患者开展远程医疗服务的医生的经验,以及促进或阻碍远程医疗采用的因素,人们知之甚少。因此,我们的目的是了解在 COVID-19 大流行期间通过远程医疗照顾老年患者的一线医生的经验。
我们于 2020 年 9 月至 11 月间,通过目的性抽样方法,从美国各地、城乡地区和学术社区实践中,招募了来自老年科(n=18)、初级保健科(n=15)和急诊科(n=15)的 48 名医生,进行了半结构式访谈。这些医生在大流行期间照顾老年患者。我们对转录的访谈进行了框架分析,以确定新出现的主题,并使用四重目标对主题进行了组织。
一线医生将远程医疗描述为一种更灵活、更注重价值和以患者为中心的医疗服务模式。使用远程医疗治疗老年患者的好处包括减少延迟护理和增加及时护理、提高医生的效率、增强与护理人员和患者的沟通、减少患者的旅行负担、促进健康外展和教育。挑战包括农村、老年或认知障碍患者的机会不平等。医生们指出,与面对面访问相比,视频和电话访问的支付均等、放宽限制规定,将提高他们继续提供远程医疗的能力。
在 COVID-19 大流行期间治疗老年患者的一线医生大多赞成在大流行后继续使用远程医疗;然而,他们指出,可持续性将取决于制定解决获取不公平和报销问题的政策。我们的数据为政策提供了一些见解,如果付诸实施,可以促进远程医疗的长期成功,并鼓励美国建立更灵活的医疗服务系统。