Pizarro-Mena Rafael, Duran-Aguero Samuel, Causa-Vera Maria, Rios-Duran Camilo, Parra-Soto Solange
Facultad de Ciencias de la Rehabilitación y Calidad de Vida, Universidad San Sebastián, Sede Los Leones, Santiago, Chile.
Dirección de Vinculación con el Medio, Vicerrectoría de Estudiantes y Vinculación con el Medio, Universidad Santo Tomás, Chile.
J Aging Res. 2025 Mar 31;2025:6839569. doi: 10.1155/jare/6839569. eCollection 2025.
The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted multicomponent face-to-face interventions with older people, which became an opportunity for the implementation of these interventions in telehealth modality, as well as the analysis of the facilitators and barriers. This qualitative study examines the facilitators and barriers, from the users' perspective, of a promotional-preventive multicomponent intervention in older people using an asynchronous telehealth modality during the COVID-19 pandemic, as a continuation of the face-to-face intervention. Semistructured in-depth interviews were used. An intentional sampling was conducted over eight groups of older people in a city, who were part of a multicomponent (physical activity, cognitive stimulation, and education) telehealth (videos, infographics, manual, and WhatsApp) promotional-preventive intervention, who came from the same face-to-face intervention. After intervention, two groups were identified (intervention and control). Telephone interviews, until theoretical saturation was reached, were audio-recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti. Twenty-six older people of both sexes, aged 60-88 years, were interviewed (14 intervened and 12 controls). Six themes were identified: positive aspects of telehealth, telehealth facilitators, preference for face-to-face modality over telehealth modality, telehealth barriers, reasons for not performing telehealth, and coping strategies in the pandemic: specifically, as facilitators, participating in the company of others, having participated in the same intervention previously (face-to-face modality), good knowledge of digital literacy, self-motivation, commitment to the program, and the emergence of innate leaders, and as barriers, pain during physical activity, complexity of cognitive exercises included in cognitive stimulation, poor digital literacy, and not having support from others. This is the first qualitative study that identifies facilitators and barriers of a multicomponent intervention in an asynchronous telehealth modality, as a continuation of the same face-to-face intervention. The asynchronous telehealth modality could be used regularly with older people in rural areas, in situations of disability and/or with care needs, pandemic scenarios, or natural disasters.
新冠疫情中断了针对老年人的多成分面对面干预措施,这为以远程医疗模式实施这些干预措施以及分析促进因素和障碍创造了契机。这项定性研究从用户角度审视了在新冠疫情期间,作为面对面干预措施的延续,使用异步远程医疗模式对老年人进行促进预防多成分干预的促进因素和障碍。研究采用了半结构化深度访谈。对该市八组老年人进行了立意抽样,他们是多成分(体育活动、认知刺激和教育)远程医疗(视频、信息图表、手册和WhatsApp)促进预防干预的一部分,且都来自同一项面对面干预措施。干预后,确定了两组(干预组和对照组)。进行电话访谈,直至达到理论饱和,访谈进行了录音和转录。使用Atlas.ti进行了主题分析。共访谈了26名年龄在60 - 88岁的男女老年人(14名干预组和12名对照组)。确定了六个主题:远程医疗的积极方面、远程医疗的促进因素、对面对面模式优于远程医疗模式的偏好、远程医疗的障碍、不进行远程医疗的原因以及疫情中的应对策略;具体而言,作为促进因素的有,在他人陪伴下参与、之前参与过相同的干预措施(面对面模式)、良好的数字素养知识、自我激励、对项目的承诺以及天生领导者的出现,作为障碍的有,体育活动时的疼痛、认知刺激中包含的认知练习的复杂性、较差的数字素养以及缺乏他人支持。这是第一项定性研究,确定了作为同一项面对面干预措施延续的异步远程医疗模式下多成分干预的促进因素和障碍。异步远程医疗模式可在农村地区的老年人、残疾人和/或有护理需求的人群、疫情场景或自然灾害情况下定期使用。