Suppr超能文献

评估实施策略,以支持记录退伍军人的护理偏好。

Evaluating implementation strategies to support documentation of veterans' care preferences.

机构信息

Organizational Systems and Adult Health, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):734-743. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13958. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of feedback reports and feedback reports + external facilitation on completion of life-sustaining treatment (LST) note the template and durable medical orders. This quality improvement program supported the national roll-out of the Veterans Health Administration (VA) LST Decisions Initiative (LSTDI), which aims to ensure that seriously-ill veterans have care goals and LST decisions elicited and documented.

DATA SOURCES

Primary data from national databases for VA nursing homes (called Community Living Centers [CLCs]) from 2018 to 2020.

STUDY DESIGN

In one project, we distributed monthly feedback reports summarizing LST template completion rates to 12 sites as the sole implementation strategy. In the second involving five sites, we distributed similar feedback reports and provided robust external facilitation, which included coaching, education, and learning collaboratives. For each project, principal component analyses matched intervention to comparison sites, and interrupted time series/segmented regression analyses evaluated the differences in LSTDI template completion rates between intervention and comparison sites.

DATA COLLECTION METHODS

Data were extracted from national databases in addition to interviews and surveys in a mixed-methods process evaluation.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

LSTDI template completion rose from 0% to about 80% throughout the study period in both projects' intervention and comparison CLCs. There were small but statistically significant differences for feedback reports alone (comparison sites performed better, coefficient estimate 3.48, standard error 0.99 for the difference between groups in change in trend) and feedback reports + external facilitation (intervention sites performed better, coefficient estimate -2.38, standard error 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Feedback reports + external facilitation was associated with a small but statistically significant improvement in outcomes compared with comparison sites. The large increases in completion rates are likely due to the well-planned national roll-out of the LSTDI. This finding suggests that when dissemination and support for widespread implementation are present and system-mandated, significant enhancements in the adoption of evidence-based practices may require more intensive support.

摘要

目的

评估反馈报告和反馈报告+外部促进对完成维持生命治疗(LST)医嘱模板和持久医疗指令的效果。这项质量改进计划支持了退伍军人健康管理局(VA)LST 决策倡议(LSTDI)的全国推广,该倡议旨在确保重病退伍军人有护理目标和 LST 决策,并记录在案。

数据来源

2018 年至 2020 年来自退伍军人事务部养老院(称为社区生活中心[CLC])的国家数据库的主要数据。

研究设计

在一个项目中,我们每月分发反馈报告,总结 LST 模板完成率,作为唯一的实施策略,分发给 12 个地点。在涉及五个地点的第二个项目中,我们分发了类似的反馈报告,并提供了强大的外部促进,包括指导、教育和学习合作。对于每个项目,主成分分析将干预措施与对照组相匹配,并通过中断时间序列/分段回归分析评估干预组和对照组之间 LSTDI 模板完成率的差异。

数据收集方法

除了混合方法过程评估中的访谈和调查外,数据还从国家数据库中提取。

主要发现

在两个项目的干预和对照组的 CLC 中,LSTDI 模板的完成率从研究期间的 0%上升到约 80%。单独使用反馈报告(对照组表现更好,组间变化趋势的差异系数估计值为 3.48,标准误差为 0.99)和反馈报告+外部促进(干预组表现更好,系数估计值为-2.38,标准误差为 0.72)都有很小但具有统计学意义的差异。

结论

与对照组相比,反馈报告+外部促进与结果的微小但具有统计学意义的改善相关。完成率的大幅提高可能是由于 LSTDI 的全国计划推广。这一发现表明,当广泛实施的传播和支持以及系统规定存在时,采用循证实践的显著增强可能需要更密集的支持。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
The Changing Adoption of Culture Change Practices in U.S. Nursing Homes.美国养老院文化变革实践的采用情况变化
Innov Aging. 2020 Jun 5;4(3):igaa012. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa012. eCollection 2020.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验