• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维持生命治疗决策倡议:国家退伍军人事务部计划尊重退伍军人护理偏好的早期实施结果。

Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: Early Implementation Results of a National Veterans Affairs Program to Honor Veterans' Care Preferences.

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs, Rocky Mountain VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.

Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1803-1812. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05697-2. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-020-05697-2
PMID:32096084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7280392/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

On July 1, 2018, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) National Center for Ethics in Health Care implemented the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI). Its goal is to identify, document, and honor LST decisions of seriously ill veterans. Providers document veterans' goals and decisions using a standardized LST template and order set.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the first 7 months of LSTDI implementation and identify predictors of LST template completion.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study of clinical and administrative data. We identified all completed LST templates, defined as completion of four required template fields. Templates also include four non-required fields. Results were stratified by risk of hospitalization or death as estimated by the Care Assessment Need (CAN) score.

SUBJECTS

All veterans with VA utilization between July 1, 2018, and January 31, 2019.

MAIN MEASURES

Completed LST templates, goals and LST preferences, and predictors of documentation.

RESULTS

LST templates were documented for 108,145 veterans, and 85% had one or more of the non-required fields completed in addition to the required fields. Approximately half documented a preference for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Among those who documented specific goals, half wanted to improve or maintain function, independence, and quality of life while 28% had a goal of life prolongation irrespective of risk of hospitalization/death and 45% expressed a goal of comfort. Only 7% expressed a goal of being cured. Predictors of documentation included VA nursing home residence, older age, frailty, and comorbidity, while non-Caucasian race, rural residence, and receipt of care in a lower complexity medical center were predictive of no documentation.

CONCLUSIONS

LST decisions were documented for veterans at high risk of hospitalization or death. While few expressed a preference for cure, half desire, cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Predictors of documentation were generally consistent with existing literature. Opportunities to reduce observed disparities exist by leveraging available VA resources and programs.

摘要

背景

2018 年 7 月 1 日,退伍军人健康管理局(VA)国家医疗保健伦理中心实施了维持生命治疗决策倡议(LSTDI)。其目标是识别、记录和尊重重病退伍军人的 LST 决定。提供者使用标准化的 LST 模板和医嘱集来记录退伍军人的目标和决定。

目的

评估 LSTDI 实施的头 7 个月,并确定 LST 模板完成情况的预测因素。

设计

回顾性观察性研究临床和行政数据。我们确定了所有已完成的 LST 模板,定义为完成四个必需模板字段。模板还包括四个非必需字段。结果按由 Care Assessment Need(CAN)评分估计的住院或死亡风险分层。

受试者

2018 年 7 月 1 日至 2019 年 1 月 31 日期间在退伍军人事务部有就诊记录的所有退伍军人。

主要措施

已完成的 LST 模板、目标和 LST 偏好,以及记录的预测因素。

结果

共记录了 108145 名退伍军人的 LST 模板,85%的退伍军人除了必填字段外,还完成了一个或多个非必填字段。大约一半的人记录了对心肺复苏术的偏好。在记录具体目标的退伍军人中,一半希望改善或维持功能、独立性和生活质量,而 28%的目标是延长生命,无论是否有住院/死亡风险,45%的目标是舒适。只有 7%的人表示希望治愈。记录的预测因素包括退伍军人事务部疗养院居住、年龄较大、脆弱和合并症,而非白种人、农村居住和在医疗中心接受较低复杂性护理与不记录相关。

结论

记录了有高住院或死亡风险的退伍军人的 LST 决策。虽然很少有人表示希望治愈,但有一半人希望接受心肺复苏术。记录的预测因素通常与现有文献一致。通过利用现有的退伍军人事务部资源和计划,可以减少观察到的差异。

相似文献

1
Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: Early Implementation Results of a National Veterans Affairs Program to Honor Veterans' Care Preferences.维持生命治疗决策倡议:国家退伍军人事务部计划尊重退伍军人护理偏好的早期实施结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1803-1812. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05697-2. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
Life-sustaining treatment decisions and family evaluations of end-of-life care for Veteran decedents in Department of Veterans Affairs nursing homes.维持生命治疗决策和退伍军人事务部疗养院已故退伍军人生命终期照护的家庭评估。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Sep;72(9):2709-2720. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19050. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
3
Family members' experience improves with care preference documentation in home based primary care.家庭照护偏好记录可改善家庭初级保健中家庭成员的体验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Dec;69(12):3576-3583. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17410. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
4
Evaluating feedback reports to support documentation of veterans' care preferences in home based primary care.评估反馈报告,以支持在家中基础护理中记录退伍军人的护理偏好。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 May 1;24(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04999-y.
5
Evaluating implementation strategies to support documentation of veterans' care preferences.评估实施策略,以支持记录退伍军人的护理偏好。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):734-743. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13958. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
6
Honoring Veterans' Preferences: The Association Between Comfort Care Goals and Care Received at the End of Life.尊重退伍军人的意愿:临终关怀目标与临终关怀接受程度之间的关联。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Apr;61(4):743-754.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.039. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
7
A Comprehensive Approach to Eliciting, Documenting, and Honoring Patient Wishes for Care Near the End of Life: The Veterans Health Administration's Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative.一种全面的方法,用于引出、记录和尊重患者在生命末期的护理意愿:退伍军人健康管理局的维持生命治疗决策倡议。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 Jan;45(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
8
The VA Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: A qualitative analysis of veterans with advanced kidney disease.VA 生命维持治疗决策倡议:晚期肾病退伍军人的定性分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2517-2529. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17807. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
9
Pilot of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative Among Veterans With Serious Illness.严重疾病退伍军人生命维持治疗决策倡议的飞行员。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jan;38(1):68-76. doi: 10.1177/1049909120923595. Epub 2020 May 8.
10
Barriers and facilitators to goals of care conversations with Veteran residents of community nursing homes.社区养老院退伍军人居民的关怀目标对话的障碍和促进因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Aug;71(8):2539-2548. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18365. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Goals-of-Care Conversations in Veterans Health Administration Clinics.2019年冠状病毒病大流行与退伍军人健康管理局诊所的照护目标对话
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515980. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15980.
2
Increasing goals of care conversations in primary care: Study protocol for a cluster randomized, pragmatic, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.提高初级保健中的照护目标谈话:一项群组随机、实用、序贯多重分配随机试验的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Oct;145:107643. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107643. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
3
Evaluating feedback reports to support documentation of veterans' care preferences in home based primary care.评估反馈报告,以支持在家中基础护理中记录退伍军人的护理偏好。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 May 1;24(1):389. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04999-y.
4
High-Intensity Care for Nursing Home Residents with Severe Dementia Hospitalized at the End of Life: A Mixed Methods Study.终末期住院的重度痴呆养老院居民的强化护理:一项混合方法研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 May;25(5):871-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
What Clinicians and Researchers Should Know About the Evolving Field of Advance Care Planning: a Narrative Review.临床医生和研究人员应该了解的不断发展的预先医疗照护计划领域:叙事性综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Mar;39(4):652-660. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08579-5. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
6
Disparities in Preoperative Goals of Care Documentation in Veterans. Veterans 术前照护目标记录中的差异
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48235.
7
No Wrong Floor on the Elevator: A Vision for the VA as an Age-Friendly Health System.电梯不误层:将退伍军人事务部打造成为关爱老年健康体系的愿景。
Fed Pract. 2023 Mar;40(3):98-100. doi: 10.12788/fp.0368. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
8
Applying the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework to inform implementation of the Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through enhanced decision-making program in the United States Veterans Health Administration.应用慢性病框架中的量身定制实施方法,为美国退伍军人健康管理局通过强化决策项目实施的“重病退伍军人偏好征集与尊重”提供信息支持。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Sep 2;2:935341. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.935341. eCollection 2022.
9
Patient Characteristics Associated With Occurrence of Preoperative Goals-of-Care Conversations.与术前目标关怀谈话发生相关的患者特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255407. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55407.
10
Risk thresholds for patients to switch between daily tablets and biweekly infusions in second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a patient preference study.二线治疗晚期肝细胞癌的患者在每日片剂和每两周输注之间转换的风险阈值:一项患者偏好研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jan 19;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10388-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary palliative care needs urgent attention.初级姑息治疗急需关注。
BMJ. 2019 Apr 18;365:l1827. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1827.
2
A Tool to Assess Patient and Surrogate Knowledge About the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) Program.用于评估患者和代理人对 POLST(维持生命治疗医师指令)计划了解程度的工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Jun;57(6):1143-1150.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
3
Partnership to Enhance Resident Outcomes for Community Living Center Residents With Dementia: Description of the Protocol and Preliminary Findings.改善社区生活中心痴呆症患者住院结局的合作项目:方案描述与初步结果
J Gerontol Nurs. 2019 Mar 1;45(3):21-30. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20190211-03.
4
POLST Registration and Associated Outcomes Among Veterans With Advanced-Stage Lung Cancer.晚期肺癌退伍军人中的POLST登记及相关结果
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Jul;36(7):564-570. doi: 10.1177/1049909118824543. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
5
Validation of the JEN frailty index in the National Long-Term Care Survey community population: identifying functionally impaired older adults from claims data.国家长期护理调查社区人群中JEN衰弱指数的验证:从理赔数据中识别功能受损的老年人。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):908. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3689-2.
6
Changes Over Time in the Oregon Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Registry: A Study of Two Decedent Cohorts.随着时间的推移,俄勒冈州维持生命治疗医嘱登记处的变化:两个死者队列的研究。
J Palliat Med. 2019 May;22(5):500-507. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0446. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
7
Identifying Latent Subgroups of High-Risk Patients Using Risk Score Trajectories.利用风险评分轨迹识别高危患者的潜在亚组。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec;33(12):2120-2126. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4653-x. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
8
A Comprehensive Approach to Eliciting, Documenting, and Honoring Patient Wishes for Care Near the End of Life: The Veterans Health Administration's Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative.一种全面的方法,用于引出、记录和尊重患者在生命末期的护理意愿:退伍军人健康管理局的维持生命治疗决策倡议。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 Jan;45(1):47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
9
Exploring provider-surrogate communication during POLST discussions for individuals with advanced dementia.探讨在晚期痴呆症患者的 POLST 讨论中,医疗服务提供者与代理人之间的沟通。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Jun;23(6):781-791. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1452899. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
10
The Progression of End-of-Life Wishes and Concordance with End-of-Life Care.生命末期愿望的进展及其与生命末期关怀的一致性。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;21(4):541-545. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0317. Epub 2018 Jan 3.