Saini Amit, Pandey V P, Kumar Pankaj, Singh Avtar, Pasricha Rajesh
Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Sangrur, Punjab, India.
J Med Phys. 2021 Oct-Dec;46(4):315-323. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_124_20. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
The accuracy of dose calculation algorithms depends on the electron density and computed tomography (CT) number of medium scanned. Our study aimed to verify the impact of different CT scanning protocols on Hounsfield unit (HU) and effect on dose calculation algorithms.
CIRS thorax phantom with different density material plugs was scanned at varying tube voltages from CT scanner and HU values were measured in treatment planning system (TPS). Calibration curves of electron density at different tube voltages were plotted and used for dose calculation with different calculation algorithms at varying high energy megavoltage photon energies.
Insignificant difference is obtained in electron density curves plotted at different tube voltages. The mean variation in HU values was found at different tube voltages for bone, lung, and water are 896.75 (standard deviation [SD] 122.88), -799.25 (SD 5.74), and -17.5 (SD 0.57), respectively. The estimated values for change in HU values were 0.089, 0.258, and 0.121 for bone, lung, and water, respectively. Pencil beam (PB) convolution and collapsed cone algorithms show no significant dose difference, i.e., <1% variation and Monte Carlo (MC) shows maximum dose difference up to 1.4%.
Third-generation algorithms such as MC shows dependence on varying tube voltages in dose calculation. Calibration curves plotted at different kVp in TPS advised to be chosen wisely to avoid any dosimetric errors in different medium.
剂量计算算法的准确性取决于所扫描介质的电子密度和计算机断层扫描(CT)值。我们的研究旨在验证不同CT扫描协议对亨氏单位(HU)的影响以及对剂量计算算法的作用。
使用带有不同密度材料插件的CIRS胸部体模,在CT扫描仪不同管电压下进行扫描,并在治疗计划系统(TPS)中测量HU值。绘制不同管电压下电子密度的校准曲线,并用于在不同高能兆伏光子能量下使用不同计算算法进行剂量计算。
在不同管电压下绘制的电子密度曲线差异不显著。在不同管电压下,发现骨、肺和水的HU值平均变化分别为896.75(标准差[SD] 122.88)、-799.25(SD 5.74)和-17.5(SD 0.57)。骨、肺和水的HU值变化估计值分别为0.089、0.258和0.121。笔形束(PB)卷积算法和坍缩圆锥算法显示剂量差异不显著,即变化<1%,而蒙特卡罗(MC)算法显示最大剂量差异高达1.4%。
第三代算法如MC在剂量计算中显示出对不同管电压的依赖性。建议在TPS中明智地选择不同千伏峰值下绘制的校准曲线,以避免在不同介质中出现任何剂量学误差。