Outcome Analysis of Reduction and Nonreduction Dismembered Pyeloplasty in Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Randomized, Prospective, Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to compare the changes in renal function and drainage following open dismembered pyeloplasty with and without renal pelvis reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized prospective study of children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction undergoing pyeloplasty with (Group 1) and without (Group 2) pelvis reduction over an 18-month period. Postoperative function and drainage were assessed by ethylene dicysteine (EC) scan and intravenous urography (IVU) and renal pelvis size by ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (2 months-11 years) participated. The mean preoperative EC scan function was Group 1: 45.88% ± 14.42% (5%-80%) and Group 2: 39.22% ± 9.75% (21%-53%). ( = 0.117). The mean postoperative EC scan function of Group 1 was 42.64% ± 9.62% (17%-54%) and 43.75% ± 9.88% (17%-58%) and of Group 2 was 44.77% ± 12.82% (20%-68%) and 42.25% ± 8.56% (23%-58%) at 3 months ( = 0.584) and ≥ 1year ( = 0.385), respectively, with no significant difference. None required re-do pyeloplasty. The number of patients with slow drainage, especially at 3 months and also at ≥1-year postoperative period on EC scan was slightly higher in Group 2 compared to Group 1 but did not attain statistical significance. There was postoperative improvement in function and drainage on IVU with no significant difference between the two groups, ( = 0.214; = 0.99, respectively). At a mean follow-up of 45.5 months, Group 2 also showed significant reduction in pelvis size on ultrasound ( = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative function remained stable in both groups. More number of patients achieved unobstructed drainage by 3 mo postoperative after reduction pyeloplasty but drainage patterns were mostly similar between reduction and nonreduction of pelvis group in late follow-up.