Department for National and Regional Functions, Division of Mental Health & Addiction, Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Personality Psychiatry, Section for Personality Psychiatry & Specialized Treatments, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Department for National and Regional Functions, Division of Mental Health & Addiction, Section for Personality Psychiatry & Specialized Treatments, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Sep;78(9):1764-1784. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23335. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
A common aspect of evidence-based treatments for people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) is pedagogical interventions and formats. In mentalization-based treatment (MBT) the introductory course has a clear pedagogical format, but a pedagogical stance is not otherwise defined.
Treatment integrity was quantitatively assessed in a sample of 346 individual MBT sessions. Nine group sessions and 24 individual MBT sessions were qualitatively subjected to interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA).
The dominating intervention type was MBT Item 16-therapist checking own understanding (31% of the interventions). IPA unveiled the following: (1) a pervasive, but hidden/implicit psychopedagogical agenda, (2) psychopedagogical content seemed precious for the patients, and (3) four tentative strategies for pedagogical interventions in MBT (a) independent reasoning; (b) epistemic trust; (c) mental flexibility; and (d) application of verified insights, knowledge, or strategies.
Development and clarification of the pedagogical stance in MBT could further improve the quality of therapists' interventions.
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者的循证治疗有一个共同特点,即使用教学干预和形式。在心理化治疗(MBT)中,入门课程有明确的教学形式,但并没有明确规定教学立场。
在一个 346 个个体 MBT 疗程的样本中,对治疗的完整性进行了定量评估。对 9 个团体疗程和 24 个个体 MBT 疗程进行了定性解释现象学分析(IPA)。
占主导地位的干预类型是 MBT 项目 16-治疗师检查自己的理解(占干预措施的 31%)。IPA 揭示了以下内容:(1)普遍存在但隐藏/隐含的心理教学议程;(2)心理教学内容似乎对患者很重要;(3)MBT 中进行教学干预的四个初步策略(a)独立推理;(b)认知信任;(c)心理灵活性;和(d)验证的见解、知识或策略的应用。
在 MBT 中发展和阐明教学立场可以进一步提高治疗师干预的质量。