College of Public Health, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.
Center for Public Health Law Research, Beasley School of Law, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2023 Mar-Apr;138(2):273-280. doi: 10.1177/00333549221076552. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
Medicaid provides health insurance for low-income people meeting specific eligibility requirements. It is funded and administered by both the federal and state governments; this decentralization leads to vastly different programs across the country. The objective of this legal surveillance project was to describe state-by-state differences in podiatric care coverage for nonelderly adults across Medicaid programs.
We used policy surveillance, a form of advanced legal mapping. It is the systematic collection and analysis of written policies across jurisdictions. Policy surveillance captures the important features of law through a rigorous scientific process to turn these policies into structured, quantitative legal data that are suitable for further evaluation or modeling. Data for the 51 jurisdictions were current as of September 1, 2020.
The vast majority of jurisdictions (82%) covered podiatric services for all classes of Medicaid beneficiaries, but the rules, restrictions, and limitations around coverage differed. Twenty-five jurisdictions had no limits on the number of podiatric visits during a specified period; 26 jurisdictions indicated a cap. Ten jurisdictions had no explicit limitations on coverage of routine foot care, whereas 33 jurisdictions covered routine foot care only when medically necessary or with a triggering condition. Eight jurisdictions did not cover routine foot care at all, and 28 jurisdictions required prior authorizations.
Podiatric care coverage, which is often preventive, varies greatly by state. This variability in coverage, which has not been previously tracked at the level of detail provided in our study, has implications for cost and health outcomes. The value of podiatric care is especially apparent in Medicaid populations. The compilation of these data can serve as a valuable resource for clinicians, researchers, and policy makers.
医疗补助计划为符合特定资格要求的低收入人群提供医疗保险。该计划由联邦政府和州政府共同出资和管理;这种权力下放导致全国范围内的项目大不相同。本法律监督项目的目的是描述医疗补助计划中针对非老年成年人的足部护理覆盖范围在各州之间的差异。
我们使用政策监督,这是一种先进的法律映射形式。它是对司法管辖区内的书面政策进行系统收集和分析。政策监督通过严格的科学过程捕捉法律的重要特征,将这些政策转化为适合进一步评估或建模的结构化、定量法律数据。截至 2020 年 9 月 1 日,51 个司法管辖区的数据都是最新的。
绝大多数司法管辖区(82%)涵盖了所有类别的医疗补助受益人的足部护理服务,但覆盖范围的规则、限制和限制有所不同。有 25 个司法管辖区在规定的时间内没有对足部护理就诊次数的限制;26 个司法管辖区表示有上限。有 10 个司法管辖区没有明确限制常规足部护理的覆盖范围,而 33 个司法管辖区仅在医学上有必要或有触发条件时才覆盖常规足部护理。有 8 个司法管辖区根本不覆盖常规足部护理,有 28 个司法管辖区需要事先授权。
足部护理覆盖范围通常是预防性的,各州之间差异很大。这种覆盖范围的变化,在我们的研究中以前没有以如此详细的水平进行跟踪,对成本和健康结果都有影响。足部护理的价值在医疗补助人群中尤为明显。这些数据的汇编可以为临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者提供有价值的资源。