关于“利益相关者对传统和补充医学专业监管的态度：系统评价”的方法学问题。
Methodological issues on "Stakeholder attitudes to the regulation of traditional and complementary medicine professions: a systematic review".
机构信息
Department of Traditional Medicine, School of Persian Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
出版信息
Hum Resour Health. 2022 Mar 9;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00718-z.
Systematic reviews cling to the doctrine that science has an updating databank and attempt to identify all available evidence by featured eligibility criteria to find the answer to a unique scientific question. Therefore, to reach this aim, these researches should use a wise method and comprehensive search strategy, as they are widely used to guide clinical and political decisions and the establishment of future researches. We would like to appreciate Jenny Carè, Amie Steel, and Jon Wardle for the valuable article "Stakeholder attitudes to the regulation of traditional and complementary medicine professions: a systematic review". Some important missed search terms in the field of traditional medicine names and traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) regulation concepts were discussed in the article.
系统评价坚持科学具有更新数据库的学说，并通过特征性纳入标准来识别所有可用证据，以找到对独特科学问题的答案。因此，为了达到这个目的，这些研究应该使用明智的方法和全面的搜索策略，因为它们被广泛用于指导临床和政治决策以及未来研究的制定。我们要感谢 Jenny Carè、Amie Steel 和 Jon Wardle 撰写了这篇有价值的文章“利益相关者对传统医学和补充医学专业监管的态度：系统评价”。文章中讨论了在传统医学名称和传统与补充医学（T&CM）监管概念领域中一些重要的遗漏检索词。
Zotero 插件