• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[社区居住老年人高龄者健康检查问卷结构视角下的结构效度:一项针对COVID-19的对策试点研究]

[Construct validity in structural perspectives of the Questionnaire for medical checkup of old-old among community-dwelling older adults: A pilot study of a countermeasure against COVID-19].

作者信息

Shinohara Tomoyuki, Saida Kosuke, Tanaka Shigeya, Murayama Akihiko, Higuchi Daisuke

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Care, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare.

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Gunma University of Health and Welfare.

出版信息

Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2022;59(1):39-48. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.59.39.

DOI:10.3143/geriatrics.59.39
PMID:35264533
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to clarify the construct validity of the Questionnaire for medical checkup of old-old (QMCOO).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, questionnaires including the QMCOO were distributed to 1,953 older adults, and responses were returned by mail. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for the QMCOO among older participants (age ≥75 years) and extracted the relevant factors. Next, we structured the model for the QMCOO based on these factors and conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using structural equation modeling. We conducted a CFA among young-older participants (age 65 to <75 years) for the same model.

RESULTS

Of the 1,110 (53.5%) adults who responded, data from the 994 respondents who provided complete answers were analyzed. Five factors were extracted from the results of the EFA: physical and mental condition, relationship with society, eating and smoking, chance for exercise, and cognitive function. The results of the CFA were as follows: comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.899, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) = 0.965, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.034, and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.040. Meanwhile, the results for young-older participants were as follows: CFI = 0.886, AGFI = 0.942, RMSEA = 0.035, and SRMR = 0.048.

CONCLUSIONS

The QMCOO assessed health condition and was composed of multiple factors associated with frailty. The CFA results indicated that the model fit was good. The QMCOO showed sufficient structural validity. Therefore, the construct validity of the QMCOO was shown.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在阐明高龄老人健康体检问卷(QMCOO)的结构效度。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,向1953名老年人发放了包括QMCOO在内的问卷,并通过邮寄方式回收答案。我们对老年参与者(年龄≥75岁)中的QMCOO进行了探索性因子分析(EFA),并提取了相关因子。接下来,我们基于这些因子构建了QMCOO模型,并使用结构方程模型进行了验证性因子分析(CFA)。我们对同一年轻老年参与者(年龄65至<75岁)进行了相同模型的CFA。

结果

在1110名(53.5%)做出回应的成年人中,分析了994名提供完整答案的受访者的数据。从EFA结果中提取了五个因子:身心健康状况、与社会的关系、饮食与吸烟、锻炼机会和认知功能。CFA结果如下:比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.899,调整后拟合优度指数(AGFI)=0.965,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)=0.034,标准化均方根残差(SRMR)=0.040。同时,年轻老年参与者的结果如下:CFI = 0.886,AGFI = 0.942,RMSEA = 0.035,SRMR = 0.048。

结论

QMCOO评估了健康状况,由与衰弱相关的多个因子组成。CFA结果表明模型拟合良好。QMCOO显示出足够的结构效度。因此,QMCOO的结构效度得到了证明。

相似文献

1
[Construct validity in structural perspectives of the Questionnaire for medical checkup of old-old among community-dwelling older adults: A pilot study of a countermeasure against COVID-19].[社区居住老年人高龄者健康检查问卷结构视角下的结构效度:一项针对COVID-19的对策试点研究]
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2022;59(1):39-48. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.59.39.
2
Construct validity of the Questionnaire for Older Senior Citizens based on a confirmatory factor analysis: A study during the period of self-restraint to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019.基于验证性因子分析的《高龄老年人问卷》的结构效度:在自我约束以防止 2019 年冠状病毒病传播期间的研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Nov;21(11):1018-1025. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14285. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
3
[An investigation to discriminate frailty based on the Questionnaire for medical checkup of old-old: A pilot study using the item response theory].[基于高龄者健康检查问卷鉴别衰弱的调查:使用项目反应理论的初步研究]
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2022;59(2):169-177. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.59.169.
4
Effectiveness of the Questionnaire for Medical Checkup of Old-Old (QMCOO) to diagnose frailty in community-dwelling older adults.老年医学体检问卷(QMCOO)诊断社区居住老年人虚弱症的有效性。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2022 Feb;22(2):127-131. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14328. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
5
Validation of the questionnaire for medical checkup of old-old (QMCOO) score cutoff to diagnose frailty.老年医学体检问卷(QMCOO)评分界值诊断衰弱的验证。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 21;23(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03885-3.
6
Psychometric properties and factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire as a screening tool for anxiety and depressive symptoms in a multi-national study of young adults.在一项针对年轻人的多国研究中,作为焦虑和抑郁症状筛查工具的一般健康问卷的心理测量特性和因子结构。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 15;187:197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.045. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
7
Questionnaire for Medical Checkup of Old-Old is non-inferior to the Kihon Checklist in screening frailty among independent older adults aged 75 years and older: The Itabashi Longitudinal Study on Aging.75 岁及以上独立老年人的老年医学体检问卷在筛查虚弱方面不劣于基本检查表:板桥老龄化纵向研究。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2024 Mar;24 Suppl 1:176-181. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14759. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
8
Development and validation of the Oxford Pandemic Attitude Scale-COVID-19 (OPAS-C): an internet-based cross-sectional study in the UK and USA.开发和验证牛津大流行态度量表-COVID-19(OPAS-C):在英国和美国进行的基于互联网的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 14;11(7):e043758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043758.
9
The Associations of Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms with Anxiety and Depression as Modified by Hemodialysis Dietary Knowledge: A Multi-Dialysis Center Study.疑似 COVID-19 症状与焦虑和抑郁的关联,经血液透析饮食知识修正:一项多透析中心研究。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 7;14(12):2364. doi: 10.3390/nu14122364.
10
Exploring Hikikomori-like idiom of distress a year into the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Oman: Factorial validity of the 25-item Hikikomori Questionnaire, prevalence and associated factors.探讨 SARS-CoV-2 大流行一年后阿曼类蛰居者样困境的习语:25 项蛰居者问卷的因子有效性、流行率及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 7;18(8):e0279612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279612. eCollection 2023.