• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越国界的税收正义——国际的还是人际的?

Tax Justice Beyond National Borders-International or Interpersonal?

作者信息

Stark Johanna

出版信息

Oxf J Leg Stud. 2021 Aug 11;42(1):133-160. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqab026. eCollection 2022 Spring.

DOI:10.1093/ojls/gqab026
PMID:35264897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8901999/
Abstract

Recent times have seen growing calls for considerations of justice to be given a greater role in international taxation. The main driver of these calls are distributive concerns, although agreement is still missing as to what this means both in principle and in practice. This article asks whether it is the task of international tax law at all to implement principles of distributive justice beyond the national context and gives an overview of how the 'global justice debate' in contemporary political philosophy bears on this question. When it comes to distributive duties with respect to taxing rights, it is crucial to differentiate between the collective and the individual level. Absent a robust assumption of a benevolent and capable government on the recipient side, the reallocation of taxing rights from state to state does not necessarily help when it comes to fulfilling duties of justice towards individuals.

摘要

近年来,要求在国际税收中给予正义考量更大作用的呼声日益高涨。这些呼声的主要驱动力是分配方面的关切,尽管在原则和实践上这意味着什么仍未达成共识。本文探讨在国家背景之外实施分配正义原则是否根本就是国际税法的任务,并概述当代政治哲学中的“全球正义辩论”如何影响这一问题。在征税权的分配义务方面,区分集体层面和个人层面至关重要。如果没有对受援国政府仁慈且有能力这一有力假设,国与国之间征税权的重新分配在履行对个人的正义义务方面不一定会有帮助。

相似文献

1
Tax Justice Beyond National Borders-International or Interpersonal?超越国界的税收正义——国际的还是人际的?
Oxf J Leg Stud. 2021 Aug 11;42(1):133-160. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqab026. eCollection 2022 Spring.
2
Make Me Want to Pay. A Three-Way Interaction Between Procedural Justice, Distributive Justice, and Power on Voluntary Tax Compliance.让我想要纳税。程序正义、分配正义和权力对自愿纳税遵从的三方交互作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 12;10:1632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01632. eCollection 2019.
3
Understanding the futility of countries' obligations for health rights: realising justice for the global poor.理解各国在健康权方面义务的徒劳:为全球贫困人口实现正义。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Jun 3;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0090-2.
4
Global Health Justice and the Right to Health.全球卫生正义与健康权。
Health Care Anal. 2015 Dec;23(4):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0297-8.
5
Taking up Daniels' challenge: The case for global health justice.接受丹尼尔斯的挑战:全球卫生正义的案例。
Health Hum Rights. 2010 Jun 15;12(1):29-46.
6
Distributive justice and global health: a call for a global corporate tax.分配正义与全球健康:呼吁征收全球企业税。
Med Law. 2007 Jun;26(2):203-12.
7
From fair predictions to just decisions? Conceptualizing algorithmic fairness and distributive justice in the context of data-driven decision-making.从合理预测到公正决策?在数据驱动决策背景下对算法公平性和分配正义进行概念化
Front Sociol. 2022 Oct 10;7:883999. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.883999. eCollection 2022.
8
Why Dependence Grounds Duties of Trade Justice.为何依附构成贸易正义的义务
Res Publica. 2020;26(4):461-479. doi: 10.1007/s11158-020-09482-0. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
9
Distributive justice, equality and the enhancement of human cognition: A commentary on fairness and 'cognitive doping'.分配正义、平等与人类认知的增进:对公平与“认知增强剂”的评论。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Sep;95:102874. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102874. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
10
Got political skill? The impact of justice on the importance of political skill for job performance.有政治技巧吗?正义对政治技巧对工作绩效重要性的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Nov;94(6):1427-37. doi: 10.1037/a0017154.