Suppr超能文献

为何依附构成贸易正义的义务

Why Dependence Grounds Duties of Trade Justice.

作者信息

Ó Laoghaire Tadhg

机构信息

Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied (IDEA) Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Res Publica. 2020;26(4):461-479. doi: 10.1007/s11158-020-09482-0. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

Abstract

This essay asks what it is about the practice of trade that grounds duties of justice between states as trade partners. The answer advanced is that such duties are grounded in the dependence that trade generates. The essay puts forward four conditions that a plausible account of grounding in trade must meet: it must admit of degrees, explain the distinctly international character of trade justice, ground both procedural and distributive duties, and it must be a necessary feature of all trade relationships which generate duties of justice. A dependence account of grounding meets all four conditions, and does so in an intuitively compelling way. While other accounts of what grounds duties of trade justice can meet some of the conditions, none can meet all of them. Relative to rival candidates, then, the dependence account provides a firmer foundation for the ongoing attempts to develop a comprehensive theory of trade justice.

摘要

本文探讨贸易实践中的何种因素构成了作为贸易伙伴的国家之间的正义义务。提出的答案是,此类义务基于贸易所产生的依赖性。本文提出了一个关于贸易中合理的基础解释必须满足的四个条件:它必须有程度之分,解释贸易正义独特的国际特征,为程序义务和分配义务提供基础,并且它必须是所有产生正义义务的贸易关系的必要特征。基于依赖性的解释满足所有这四个条件,而且是以一种直观上令人信服的方式做到的。虽然关于贸易正义义务基础的其他解释可以满足某些条件,但没有一种能满足所有条件。那么,相对于其他竞争候选解释,基于依赖性的解释为正在进行的构建全面贸易正义理论的尝试提供了更坚实的基础。

相似文献

1
Why Dependence Grounds Duties of Trade Justice.为何依附构成贸易正义的义务
Res Publica. 2020;26(4):461-479. doi: 10.1007/s11158-020-09482-0. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
2
The ground of ground, essence, and explanation.基础、本质与解释的根基。
Synthese. 2021;198(Suppl 6):1257-1277. doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-1856-y. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
4
Tax Justice Beyond National Borders-International or Interpersonal?超越国界的税收正义——国际的还是人际的?
Oxf J Leg Stud. 2021 Aug 11;42(1):133-160. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqab026. eCollection 2022 Spring.
5
Ancillary care duties: the demands of justice.辅助性医疗护理职责:公正的诉求。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Nov;36(11):708-11. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.035758. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
6
Precision Medicine and Rough Justice: Wicked Problems.精准医学与不公正裁决:棘手难题
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Jan;33(1):1-4. doi: 10.1017/S0963180123000312. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Distributive and procedural justice in seven nations.七个国家的分配正义与程序正义
Law Hum Behav. 2000 Oct;24(5):553-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1005571012599.
8
No theory of justice can ground health care reform.没有一种正义理论可以为医疗改革提供依据。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Fall;40(3):598-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00692.x.
10
[Globalization, international trade, and health equity].[全球化、国际贸易与健康公平]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2002 May-Jun;11(5-6):425-9. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892002000500018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验