• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负压伤口治疗可预防同时进行的腹直肌旁疝修补术和腹壁成形术中的疝复发。

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Prevents Hernia Recurrence in Simultaneous Ventral Hernia Repair and Panniculectomy.

作者信息

Deldar Romina, Abu El Hawa Areeg A, Bovill John D, Hipolito Dionisio, Tefera Eshetu, Bhanot Parag, Fan Kenneth L, Evans Karen K

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.

Department of General Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 7;10(3):e4171. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004171. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000004171
PMID:35265446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8901215/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Simultaneous ventral hernia repair with panniculectomy (VHR-PAN) is associated with a high rate of wound complications. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been shown to lower complications in high-risk wounds. There is a debate in the literature as to whether ciNPWT is effective at preventing complications in VHR-PAN. The aim of our study was to evaluate if ciNPWT improves outcomes of VHR-PAN.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent VHR-PAN between 2009 and 2021 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) those who received standard sterile dressings (SSD), or (2) ciNPWT. Primary outcomes were postoperative complications, including surgical site occurrences (SSO) and hernia recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were identified: 57 patients each in the SSD group and ciNPWT group. The groups were similar in demographics and comorbidities. There were more smokers in the SSD group (22.8% versus 5.3%, = 0.013). Hernia defect size was significantly larger in patients who received ciNPWT (202.0 versus 143.4 cm, = 0.010). Overall SSO was similar between the two groups (23.2% versus 26.3%, = 0.663). At a mean follow-up of 6.6 months, hernia recurrence rate was significantly higher in the SSD group compared with that in the ciNPWT group. (10.5% versus 0%, = 0.027). Smoking, diabetes, component separation, mesh type, and location were not significantly associated with hernia recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of incisional NPWT is beneficial in decreasing hernia recurrence in VHR-PAN, compared with standard dressings. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further elucidate the utility of ciNPWT in abdominal wall reconstruction.

摘要

未标注

同期行腹直肌前鞘修补术与腹壁成形术(VHR-PAN)会导致较高的伤口并发症发生率。闭合切口负压伤口治疗(ciNPWT)已被证明可降低高危伤口的并发症发生率。关于ciNPWT在预防VHR-PAN并发症方面是否有效,文献中存在争议。我们研究的目的是评估ciNPWT是否能改善VHR-PAN的治疗效果。

方法

对2009年至2021年间接受VHR-PAN手术的患者进行回顾性研究。患者分为两组:(1)接受标准无菌敷料(SSD)的患者,或(2)接受ciNPWT的患者。主要结局指标为术后并发症,包括手术部位事件(SSO)和疝复发。

结果

共纳入114例患者:SSD组和ciNPWT组各57例。两组在人口统计学和合并症方面相似。SSD组吸烟者更多(22.8%对5.3%,P = 0.013)。接受ciNPWT的患者疝缺损尺寸明显更大(202.0对143.4平方厘米,P = 0.010)。两组总体SSO相似(23.2%对26.3%,P = 0.663)。平均随访6.6个月时,SSD组疝复发率明显高于ciNPWT组(10.5%对0%,P = 0.027)。吸烟、糖尿病、组织分离、补片类型和位置与疝复发无显著相关性。

结论

与标准敷料相比,切口NPWT的应用有利于降低VHR-PAN中的疝复发率。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,以进一步阐明ciNPWT在腹壁重建中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ea/8901215/79ebf7dc1f4f/gox-10-e4171-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ea/8901215/79ebf7dc1f4f/gox-10-e4171-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ea/8901215/79ebf7dc1f4f/gox-10-e4171-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Prevents Hernia Recurrence in Simultaneous Ventral Hernia Repair and Panniculectomy.负压伤口治疗可预防同时进行的腹直肌旁疝修补术和腹壁成形术中的疝复发。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 7;10(3):e4171. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004171. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Closed-incision negative-pressure therapy decreases complications in ventral hernia repair with concurrent panniculectomy.闭合式切口负压治疗降低了合并腹脂切除术的腹疝修补术的并发症。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1865-2. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
3
Surgical Site Occurrences of Simultaneous Panniculectomy and Incisional Hernia Repair.同时进行腹壁成形术和切口疝修补术的手术部位情况
Am Surg. 2015 Aug;81(8):764-9.
4
The impact of simultaneous panniculectomy in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同期行腹侧疝修补术对腹茧症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2125-2136. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03149-y. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
5
Application of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Ventral Hernia Repair Surgery Using a Polypropylene Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial.闭合式切口负压伤口疗法在聚丙烯网片修补腹疝手术中的应用:一项随机临床试验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 22;60(9):1548. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091548.
6
Cutting through the fat: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes, cost, and quality of life with the addition of panniculectomy to ventral hernia repair in overweight patients.切除多余脂肪:对超重患者行腹疝修补术时附加行皮瓣切除术的临床结局、成本和生活质量的回顾性分析。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):969-977. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02024-5. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
7
Comparative study of wound complications: isolated panniculectomy versus panniculectomy combined with ventral hernia repair.对比研究切口并发症:单纯行腹皮瓣切除术与腹皮瓣切除术联合腹疝修补术。
J Surg Res. 2012 Oct;177(2):387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.06.029. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
8
Is simultaneous panniculectomy an ideal approach to repair a ventral hernia: a general surgeon's experience.同期行腹壁脂肪切除术是修复腹疝的理想方法吗:一位普通外科医生的经验
Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):139-147. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02483-9. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
9
Concurrent panniculectomy with open ventral hernia repair has added risk versus ventral hernia repair: an analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database.同期行腹带切除术联合开放式腹疝修补术相较于腹疝修补术具有更高的风险:ACS-NSQIP 数据库分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 May;67(5):693-701. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.01.021. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
10
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Achieves Better Outcome Than Standard Wound Care: Clinical Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Open Ventral Hernia Repair With Synthetic Mesh Positioning.闭合切口负压治疗比标准伤口护理效果更佳:使用合成补片定位的开放性腹疝修补术的临床结果及成本效益分析
Cureus. 2020 May 26;12(5):e8283. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8283.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review meta-analysis.预防性负压伤口治疗在开放型腹疝修补术后的疗效:系统评价荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02280-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing the Risk of Postoperative Problems With Panniculectomies Using the Prevena Plus™ 125 Incisional Management Dressing.使用Prevena Plus™ 125切口管理敷料降低腹壁成形术后问题的风险。
Cureus. 2020 Jul 22;12(7):e9341. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9341.
2
The impact of closed incision negative pressure therapy on prevention of median sternotomy infection for high risk cases: a single centre retrospective study.闭合切口负压治疗对高危病例预防正中切开感染的影响:单中心回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 19;15(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01265-1.
3
Low Complication Rates Using Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy for Panniculectomies: A Single-Surgeon, Retrospective, Uncontrolled Case Series.
经皮闭合法切口负压治疗在去脂整形术中的低并发症发生率:单外科医生回顾性非对照病例系列研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Aug;146(2):390-397. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007026.
4
Simultaneous Ventral Hernia Repair and Panniculectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.同期行腹疝修补术和腹皮瓣切除术治疗腹疝合并腹壁松弛的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Apr;145(4):1059-1067. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006677.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the reduction of surgical site infection in closed incision management versus standard of care dressings over closed vascular groin incisions.一项关于闭合性腹股沟血管切口闭合切口管理与标准护理敷料相比减少手术部位感染的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Vascular. 2020 Jun;28(3):274-284. doi: 10.1177/1708538119890960. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
6
Negative pressure wound therapy for closed incisions in orthopedic trauma surgery: a meta-analysis.负压伤口疗法在骨科创伤手术闭合切口中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 11;14(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1488-z.
7
Twelve years of component separation technique in abdominal wall reconstruction.十二年的腹部壁重建中的组件分离技术。
Surgery. 2019 Oct;166(4):435-444. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.043. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
8
Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy Efficacy in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in High-Risk Patients: A Meta-analysis.密闭式切口负压治疗在高危腹壁重建患者中的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.033. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
9
Biomechanical Effects of Incisional Negative Wound Pressure Dressing: An Ex Vivo Model Using Human and Porcine Abdominal Walls.切口负压伤口敷料的生物力学效应:使用人体和猪腹壁的离体模型。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 30;2018:7058461. doi: 10.1155/2018/7058461. eCollection 2018.
10
Closed-incision negative-pressure therapy decreases complications in ventral hernia repair with concurrent panniculectomy.闭合式切口负压治疗降低了合并腹脂切除术的腹疝修补术的并发症。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1865-2. Epub 2018 Dec 17.