• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速综述:识别针对动脉粥样硬化相关心血管疾病人群的数字健康干预措施,以解决种族、民族和社会经济方面的健康差异。

Rapid review: Identification of digital health interventions in atherosclerotic-related cardiovascular disease populations to address racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic health disparities.

作者信息

Thomas Craig Kelly J, Fusco Nicole, Lindsley Kristina, Snowdon Jane L, Willis Van C, Arriaga Yull E, Dankwa-Mullan Irene

机构信息

Center for AI, Research, and Evaluation, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Life Sciences, IBM Watson Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2020 Nov 6;1(3):139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.001. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.001
PMID:35265886
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8890337/
Abstract

Disparities in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and associated health and healthcare delivery outcomes have been partially attributed to differential risk factors, and to prevention and treatment inequities within racial and ethnic (including language) minority groups and low socioeconomic status (SES) populations in urban and rural settings. Digital health interventions (DHIs) show promise in promoting equitable access to high-quality care, optimal utilization, and improved outcomes; however, their potential role and impact has not been fully explored. The role of DHIs to mitigate drivers of the health disparities listed above in populations disproportionately affected by atherosclerotic-related CVD was systematically reviewed using published literature (January 2008-July 2020) from multiple databases. Study design, type and description of the technology, health disparities information, type of CVD, outcomes, and notable barriers and innovations associated with the technology utilized were abstracted. Study quality was assessed using the Oxford Levels of Evidence. Included studies described digital health technologies in a disparity population with CVD and reported outcomes. DHIs significantly improved health (eg, clinical, intermediate, and patient-reported) and healthcare delivery (eg, access, quality, and utilization of care) outcomes in populations disproportionately affected by CVD in 24 of 38 included studies identified from 2104 citations. Hypertension control was the most frequently improved clinical outcome. Telemedicine, mobile health, and clinical decision support systems were the most common types of DHIs identified. DHIs improved CVD-related health and healthcare delivery outcomes in racial/ethnic groups and low SES populations in both rural and urban geographies globally.

摘要

心血管疾病(CVD)以及相关健康和医疗服务结果的差异,部分归因于不同的风险因素,以及城乡环境中种族和族裔(包括语言)少数群体和社会经济地位较低(SES)人群在预防和治疗方面的不平等。数字健康干预措施(DHIs)在促进公平获得高质量医疗、优化利用和改善结果方面显示出前景;然而,其潜在作用和影响尚未得到充分探索。我们使用多个数据库中已发表的文献(2008年1月至2020年7月),系统回顾了数字健康干预措施在受动脉粥样硬化相关心血管疾病影响尤为严重的人群中,对减轻上述健康差异驱动因素的作用。提取了研究设计、技术类型和描述、健康差异信息、心血管疾病类型、结果,以及与所使用技术相关的显著障碍和创新。使用牛津证据水平评估研究质量。纳入的研究描述了在患有心血管疾病的差异人群中的数字健康技术,并报告了结果。在从2104篇文献中筛选出的38项纳入研究中的24项中,数字健康干预措施显著改善了受心血管疾病影响尤为严重人群的健康(如临床、中间指标和患者报告的结果)和医疗服务(如医疗可及性、质量和利用)结果。高血压控制是最常得到改善的临床结果。远程医疗、移动健康和临床决策支持系统是最常见的数字健康干预措施类型。数字健康干预措施在全球城乡地区的种族/族裔群体和社会经济地位较低人群中,改善了与心血管疾病相关的健康和医疗服务结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2449/8890337/68064be4f307/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2449/8890337/5178adc80676/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2449/8890337/13e95d6fcdf9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2449/8890337/228bd4ffd289/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2449/8890337/68064be4f307/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2449/8890337/5178adc80676/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2449/8890337/13e95d6fcdf9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2449/8890337/228bd4ffd289/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2449/8890337/68064be4f307/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Rapid review: Identification of digital health interventions in atherosclerotic-related cardiovascular disease populations to address racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic health disparities.快速综述:识别针对动脉粥样硬化相关心血管疾病人群的数字健康干预措施,以解决种族、民族和社会经济方面的健康差异。
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2020 Nov 6;1(3):139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.001. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
2
Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review.数字健康干预措施加强初级保健中的预防工作:范围审查
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jan 21;10(1):e33518. doi: 10.2196/33518.
3
Understanding ethnic inequalities in the design and implementation of digital health interventions for cardiometabolic disease: a qualitative study.理解心血管代谢疾病数字健康干预措施在设计和实施方面的种族不平等:一项定性研究。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02130-X.
4
The Use of Digital Health Interventions for Cardiometabolic Diseases Among South Asian and Black Minority Ethnic Groups: Realist Review.数字健康干预在南亚和黑少数族裔群体中心血管代谢疾病中的应用:真实主义综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 6;25:e40630. doi: 10.2196/40630.
5
The Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Systematic Review.数字健康干预措施对心血管疾病管理的成本效益:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 17;21(6):e13166. doi: 10.2196/13166.
6
7
8
Health Disparities in Cardiac Critical Care: Understanding Inequities, Barriers, and Pathways Toward Equitable Access and Enhanced Outcomes.心脏重症监护中的健康差异:理解不平等、障碍以及实现公平获取和改善结局的途径。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 9;16(7):e64151. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64151. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Digital health interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于预防心血管疾病的数字健康干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Apr;90(4):469-80. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.12.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing health service equity through telehealth: A systematic review of reviews.通过远程医疗解决卫生服务公平性问题:综述的系统评价
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 1;11:20552076251326233. doi: 10.1177/20552076251326233. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Digital Health Interventions for the Optimization of Postpartum Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Scoping Review.用于优化产后心血管健康的数字健康干预措施:一项系统综述。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Dec 13;21:100917. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100917. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Rationale and Design of a Study to Assess the Engagement and Usefulness of the Care4Today Connect Digital Health Application for Disease Management in Coronary Artery Disease and Peripheral Artery Disease (iPACE-CVD Study).

本文引用的文献

1
Pulling at the heart: COVID-19, race/ethnicity and ongoing disparities.牵动人心:COVID-19、种族/民族与持续存在的差异。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020 Sep;17(9):533-535. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0416-6.
2
Potential Indirect Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Use of Emergency Departments for Acute Life-Threatening Conditions - United States, January-May 2020.2020 年 1 月至 5 月美国因 COVID-19 大流行对急诊部门用于急性危及生命病症的潜在间接影响。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jun 26;69(25):795-800. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6925e2.
3
Coronavirus disease 2019 and cardiovascular system: A narrative review.
一项评估Care4Today Connect数字健康应用程序在冠状动脉疾病和外周动脉疾病疾病管理中的参与度和实用性的研究的基本原理与设计(iPACE-CVD研究)。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Dec;47(12):e70039. doi: 10.1002/clc.70039.
4
Visions for digital integrated cardiovascular care: HRS Digital Health Committee perspectives.数字集成心血管护理愿景:心脏节律学会数字健康委员会观点
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2024 Feb 24;5(2):37-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.02.003. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
The roles of health literacy and social support in the association between smartphone ownership and frailty in older adults: a moderated mediation model.健康素养和社会支持在智能手机拥有与老年人衰弱之间的关系中的作用:一个有调节的中介模型。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 17;24(1):1064. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18163-z.
6
Pharmacoinformatics-enabled Interventions Improved Care Coordination and Identified Pharmacy-Related Safety Issues in a Multicultural Medicare Population.基于药物信息学的干预措施改善了护理协调,并在多元文化的医疗保险人群中识别出与药房相关的安全问题。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):320-326. doi: 10.1055/a-2297-4334. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
7
Why do users override alerts? Utilizing large language model to summarize comments and optimize clinical decision support.用户为什么会忽略警报?利用大语言模型总结评论并优化临床决策支持。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 May 20;31(6):1388-1396. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae041.
8
Using AI-generated suggestions from ChatGPT to optimize clinical decision support.利用 ChatGPT 生成的人工智能建议来优化临床决策支持。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;30(7):1237-1245. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad072.
9
Disparities in telehealth access, not willingness to use services, likely explain rural telehealth disparities.农村远程医疗服务的差异可能是由于远程医疗获取方面的差异,而不是服务使用意愿的差异。
J Rural Health. 2023 Jun;39(3):617-624. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12759. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
10
The Promise of Digital Health: Then, Now, and the Future.数字健康的前景:过去、现在与未来。
NAM Perspect. 2022 Jun 27;2022. doi: 10.31478/202206e. eCollection 2022.
2019年冠状病毒病与心血管系统:一篇综述
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Jun 3;29:100557. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100557. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
COVID-19 pandemic: the effects of quarantine on cardiovascular risk.COVID-19 大流行:隔离对心血管风险的影响。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020 Jun;74(6):852-855. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-0646-z. Epub 2020 May 5.
5
Cardiovascular Risks in Patients with COVID-19: Potential Mechanisms and Areas of Uncertainty.COVID-19 患者的心血管风险:潜在机制和不确定领域。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 Apr 29;22(5):34. doi: 10.1007/s11886-020-01293-2.
6
Preliminary Estimates of the Prevalence of Selected Underlying Health Conditions Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 - United States, February 12-March 28, 2020.2019 年冠状病毒病患者中某些基础健康状况的初步估计——美国,2020 年 2 月 12 日至 3 月 28 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 3;69(13):382-386. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e2.
7
A Systems-Level Approach to Improving Medication Adherence in Hypertensive Latinos: a Randomized Control Trial.一种改善拉丁裔高血压患者药物依从性的系统层面方法:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):182-189. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05419-3. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
Using Electronic Referrals to Address Health Disparities and Improve Blood Pressure Control.利用电子转诊解决健康差异问题,改善血压控制。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Aug 22;16:E114. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180583.
9
Addressing Diabetes and Poorly Controlled Hypertension: Pragmatic mHealth Self-Management Intervention.应对糖尿病和控制不佳的高血压:实用移动健康自我管理干预措施
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 9;21(4):e12541. doi: 10.2196/12541.
10
Impact of a Culturally Tailored mHealth Medication Regimen Self-Management Program upon Blood Pressure among Hypertensive Hispanic Adults.文化定制型移动医疗药物治疗自我管理方案对西班牙裔高血压成年人血压的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 6;16(7):1226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071226.