Weng Willy, Blanchard Chris, Reed Jennifer L, Matheson Kara, McIntyre Ciorsti, Gray Chris, Sapp John L, Gardner Martin, AbdelWahab Amir, Yung Jason, Parkash Ratika
University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2020 Nov 28;2(1):63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.005. eCollection 2021 Feb.
There are little data on the use of virtual care for patients with arrhythmia. We evaluated a virtual clinic platform, in conjunction with specialist care, for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF).
This was a prospective, observational cohort study evaluating an online educational and treatment platform, with a randomized sub-study examining the use of an ambulatory single-lead electrocardiogram heart monitor (AHM). Follow-up was 6 months. The main outcome was patients' platform use; success was defined as 90% of patients using the platform at least once, and 75% using it at least twice. The primary outcome in the AHM sub-study was Atrial Fibrillation Symptom Severity (AFSS) score. Other outcomes included patient satisfaction questionnaires, quality of life, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations for AF.
We enrolled 94 patients between July 2018 and May 2019; 83% of patients logged in at least once and 54.3% more than once. Patients who were older, were male, or had new-onset AF were more likely to log in to the platform. Satisfaction scores were high; 70%-94% of patients responded favorably. Quality-of-life scores improved at 3 and 6 months. In the AHM sub-study (n = 71), those who received an AHM had lower AFSS scores (least square mean difference -2.52, 95% CI -4.48 to -0.25, = .03). There was no difference in emergency department visits or hospitalizations.
The online platform did not reach our feasibility target but was well received. Allocation of an AHM was associated with improved quality of life. Virtual AF care shows promise and should be evaluated in further research.
关于心律失常患者使用虚拟护理的数据很少。我们评估了一个虚拟诊所平台,并结合专科护理,用于有症状心房颤动(AF)的患者。
这是一项前瞻性观察队列研究,评估一个在线教育和治疗平台,同时有一个随机子研究,考察动态单导联心电图心脏监测仪(AHM)的使用情况。随访时间为6个月。主要结局是患者对平台的使用情况;成功定义为90%的患者至少使用一次平台,75%的患者至少使用两次平台。AHM子研究的主要结局是心房颤动症状严重程度(AFSS)评分。其他结局包括患者满意度问卷、生活质量、急诊就诊以及因AF住院情况。
2018年7月至2019年5月,我们招募了94例患者;83%的患者至少登录过一次平台,54.3%的患者登录过不止一次。年龄较大、男性或新发AF的患者更有可能登录平台。满意度评分较高;70%-94%的患者给出了积极反馈。生活质量评分在3个月和6个月时有所改善。在AHM子研究(n = 71)中,接受AHM的患者AFSS评分较低(最小二乘均值差异为-2.52,95%可信区间为-4.48至-0.25,P = 0.03)。急诊就诊或住院情况没有差异。
在线平台未达到我们的可行性目标,但受到了好评。分配AHM与生活质量改善相关。虚拟AF护理显示出前景,应在进一步研究中进行评估。