Department of Family and Community Medicine, Healthforce Center, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Sep;37(12):3045-3053. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07472-x. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
There are concerns about the capacity of rural primary care due to potential workforce shortages and patients with disproportionately more clinical and socioeconomic risks. Little research examines the configuration and delivery of primary care along the spectrum of rurality.
Compare structure, capabilities, and payment reform participation of isolated, small town, micropolitan, and metropolitan physician practices, and the characteristics and utilization of their Medicare beneficiaries.
Observational study of practices defined using IQVIA OneKey, 2017 Medicare claims, and, for a subset, the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (response rate=47%).
A total of 27,716,967 beneficiaries with qualifying visits who were assigned to practices.
We characterized practices' structure, capabilities, and payment reform participation and measured beneficiary utilization by rurality.
Rural practices were smaller, more primary care dominant, and system-owned, and had more beneficiaries per practice. Beneficiaries in rural practices were more likely to be from high-poverty areas and disabled. There were few differences in patterns of outpatient utilization and practices' care delivery capabilities. Isolated and micropolitan practices reported less engagement in quality-focused payment programs than metropolitan practices. Beneficiaries cared for in more rural settings received fewer recommended mammograms and had higher overall and condition-specific readmissions. Fewer beneficiaries with diabetes in rural practices had an eye exam. Most isolated rural beneficiaries traveled to more urban communities for care.
While most isolated Medicare beneficiaries traveled to more urban practices for outpatient care, those receiving care in rural practices had similar outpatient and inpatient utilization to urban counterparts except for readmissions and quality metrics that rely on services outside of primary care. Rural practices reported similar care capabilities to urban practices, suggesting that despite differences in workforce and demographics, rural patterns of primary care delivery are comparable to urban.
由于潜在的劳动力短缺以及患者面临不成比例的更多临床和社会经济风险,农村初级保健的能力令人担忧。很少有研究从农村的角度研究初级保健的配置和服务提供。
比较偏远、小镇、小城市和大都市医生实践的结构、能力和参与支付改革的情况,以及他们的医疗保险受益人的特征和利用情况。
使用 IQVIA OneKey、2017 年医疗保险索赔以及(对于一部分)国家医疗保健组织和系统调查对实践进行观察性研究(响应率=47%)。
共有 27716967 名符合条件的就诊受益人与符合条件的实践相关。
我们描述了实践的结构、能力和参与支付改革的情况,并根据农村地区的情况衡量了受益人的利用情况。
农村实践规模较小,以初级保健为主,且为系统所有,每个实践的受益人数更多。农村实践的受益人与高贫困地区和残疾人士的关联度更高。门诊利用模式和实践提供护理的能力几乎没有差异。与大都市实践相比,偏远和小城市实践报告参与质量为重点的支付计划的比例较低。在农村环境中接受治疗的患者接受的推荐乳房 X 光检查较少,总体和特定条件的再入院率较高。在农村实践中,患有糖尿病的受益人的眼部检查较少。在农村实践中,大多数患有糖尿病的受益人均前往更城市化的社区接受治疗。
尽管大多数偏远地区的医疗保险受益人均前往更城市化的实践进行门诊治疗,但那些在农村实践中接受治疗的患者除了依赖于初级保健以外的服务的再入院率和质量指标外,其门诊和住院利用情况与城市患者相似。农村实践报告的护理能力与城市实践相似,这表明尽管劳动力和人口统计学存在差异,但农村初级保健的服务模式与城市相当。