Suppr超能文献

“使用生态瞬时评估测试饮酒前和饮酒后饮酒调节模型”:勘误。

"Testing Affect Regulation Models of Drinking Prior to and After Drinking Initiation Using Ecological Momentary Assessment": Correction.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Mar;36(2):220. doi: 10.1037/adb0000827.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Reports an error in "Testing affect regulation models of drinking prior to and after drinking initiation using ecological momentary assessment" by Jimikaye B. Courtney and Michael A. Russell (, 2021[Aug], Vol 35[5], 597-608). In the article "Testing Affect Regulation Models of Drinking Prior to and After Drinking Initiation Using Ecological Momentary Assessment" by Jimikaye B. Courtney and Michael A. Russell (Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2021, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1037/ adb0000763), the authors discovered a slight issue in the analytical code, which required changes to the abstract, Public Health Significant Statement, Research Questions 1 and 2 in the Results section, Table 3, and the first two paragraphs of the Discussion section. All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2021-57513-001.) Objective: Affect regulation models of drinking state that affect motivates and reinforces drinking. Few studies have been able to elucidate the timing of these associations in natural settings. We tested positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) as predictors of drinking behavior, both prior to and during drinking episodes, and whether drinking predicted changes in affect during episodes.

METHOD

Two hundred twenty-two regularly drinking young adults (21-29 years, 84% undergraduates), completed an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol for five consecutive 24-hr periods stretching across 6 days (Wednesday-Monday). Participants provided PA and NA reports three times daily and every half hour during drinking episodes. Alcohol consumption reports were provided each morning and every half hour during drinking episodes.

RESULTS

Multi-level models showed that greater pre-drinking PA predicted higher odds of drinking, but not number of drinks consumed. Pre-drinking NA did not predict same day odds of drinking or drinks consumed. Episode-level results revealed different associations for PA and NA with drinking. Current PA did not predict drinks consumed over the next half hour; however, increased drinking was associated with greater increases in PA over the next half hour. Higher NA predicted fewer drinks consumed in the next half hour and higher odds of the end of a drinking episode; however, increased drinking was not associated with changes in NA.

CONCLUSIONS

PA increased following drinking during episodes. Our results suggest that a focus on PA prior to episodes and a focus on NA during episodes may interrupt processes leading to heavy drinking, and may therefore aid prevention efforts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

未加标签

吉姆凯耶·B·考特尼和迈克尔·A·拉塞尔(2021 年 8 月,第 35 卷第 5 期,第 597-608 页)发表的“使用生态瞬时评估测试饮酒起始前后饮酒的情绪调节模型”一文中存在错误。在吉姆凯耶·B·考特尼和迈克尔·A·拉塞尔(心理学成瘾行为,2021 年,第 35 卷,第 5 期,第 597-608 页。https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000763)发表的“使用生态瞬时评估测试饮酒起始前后饮酒的情绪调节模型”一文中,作者在分析代码中发现了一个小问题,这需要修改摘要、公共卫生重要声明、结果部分的研究问题 1 和 2、表 3 以及讨论部分的前两段。本文的所有版本都已更正。(原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录 2021-57513-001 中。)目的:饮酒状态的情绪调节模型表明,情绪会促使和强化饮酒。很少有研究能够在自然环境中阐明这些关联的时间。我们测试了积极情绪(PA)和消极情绪(NA)作为饮酒行为的预测因素,包括饮酒前和饮酒期间,以及饮酒是否会预测饮酒期间情绪的变化。

方法

222 名经常饮酒的年轻成年人(21-29 岁,84%为本科生),完成了为期 6 天的连续 5 个 24 小时的生态瞬时评估(EMA)方案(星期三至星期一)。参与者每天早上和饮酒期间每半小时提供一次 PA 和 NA 报告,每半小时提供一次饮酒报告。

结果

多层次模型显示,饮酒前较高的 PA 预测饮酒的可能性较高,但不能预测饮酒量。饮酒前的 NA 并不预测当天的饮酒可能性或饮酒量。基于事件的结果显示,PA 和 NA 与饮酒的关联不同。当前的 PA 并不预测下半小时内的饮酒量;然而,下半小时内的饮酒量增加与 PA 的增加有关。较高的 NA 预测下半小时内的饮酒量减少和饮酒结束的几率较高;然而,增加饮酒量与 NA 的变化无关。

结论

在饮酒过程中,PA 增加。我们的结果表明,在事件发生前关注 PA,在事件发生时关注 NA,可能会打断导致大量饮酒的过程,因此可能有助于预防工作。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验