Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Alabama at Birminghamgrid.265892.2, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Virol. 2022 Apr 13;96(7):e0220621. doi: 10.1128/jvi.02206-21. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Despite the clinical importance of latent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, our understanding of the biomolecular processes involved in HIV-1 latency control is still limited. This study was designed to address whether interactions between viral proteins, specifically HIV Nef, and the host cell could affect latency establishment. The study was driven by three reported observations. First, early reports suggested that human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection in patients produces a lower viral RNA/DNA ratio than HIV-1 infection, potentially indicating an increased propensity of HIV-2 to produce latent infection. Second, Nef, an early viral gene product, has been shown to alter the activation state of infected cells in a lentiviral lineage-dependent manner. Third, it has been demonstrated that the ability of HIV-1 to establish latent infection is a function of the activation state of the host cell at the time of infection. Based on these observations, we reasoned that HIV-2 Nef may have the ability to promote latency establishment. We demonstrate that HIV-1 latency establishment in T cell lines and primary T cells is indeed differentially modulated by Nef proteins. In the context of an HIV-1 backbone, HIV-1 Nef promoted active HIV-1 infection, while HIV-2 Nef strongly promoted latency establishment. Given that Nef represents the only difference in these HIV-1 vectors and is known to interact with numerous cellular factors, these data add support to the idea that latency establishment is a host cell-virus interaction phenomenon, but they also suggest that the HIV-1 lineage may have evolved mechanisms to counteract host cell suppression. Therapeutic attempts to eliminate the latent HIV-1 reservoir have failed, at least in part due to our incomplete biomolecular understanding of how latent HIV-1 infection is established and maintained. We here address the fundamental question of whether all lentiviruses actually possess a similar capacity to establish latent infections or whether there are differences between the lentiviral lineages driving differential latency establishment that could be exploited to develop improved latency reversal agents. Research investigating the viral RNA/DNA ratio in HIV-1 and HIV-2 patients could suggest that HIV-2 indeed has a much higher propensity to establish latent infections, a trait that we found, at least in part, to be attributable to the HIV-2 Nef protein. Reported Nef-mediated effects on host cell activation thus also affect latency establishment, and HIV-1 vectors that carry different lentiviral nef genes should become key tools to develop a better understanding of the biomolecular basis of HIV-1 latency establishment.
尽管潜伏性人类免疫缺陷病毒 1 型(HIV-1)感染具有重要的临床意义,但我们对 HIV-1 潜伏期控制所涉及的生物分子过程的理解仍然有限。本研究旨在探讨病毒蛋白(特别是 HIV Nef)与宿主细胞之间的相互作用是否会影响潜伏期的建立。本研究的驱动力来自三个已报道的观察结果。首先,早期报告表明,HIV-2 感染患者产生的病毒 RNA/DNA 比值低于 HIV-1 感染,这可能表明 HIV-2 更倾向于产生潜伏感染。其次,早期病毒基因产物 Nef 已被证明以依赖于慢病毒谱系的方式改变感染细胞的激活状态。第三,已经证明 HIV-1 建立潜伏感染的能力是感染时宿主细胞激活状态的函数。基于这些观察结果,我们推断 HIV-2 Nef 可能具有促进潜伏期建立的能力。我们证明,HIV-1 在 T 细胞系和原代 T 细胞中的潜伏期建立确实受到 Nef 蛋白的差异调节。在 HIV-1 骨架的背景下,HIV-1 Nef 促进了 HIV-1 的活性感染,而 HIV-2 Nef 则强烈促进了潜伏期的建立。鉴于 Nef 是这些 HIV-1 载体中的唯一区别,并且已知与许多细胞因子相互作用,这些数据支持潜伏期建立是宿主细胞-病毒相互作用现象的观点,但它们也表明 HIV-1 谱系可能已经进化出了对抗宿主细胞抑制的机制。 消除潜伏 HIV-1 库的治疗尝试失败了,至少部分原因是我们对潜伏 HIV-1 感染的建立和维持的生物分子理解不完整。我们在这里解决了一个基本问题,即所有慢病毒实际上是否都具有建立潜伏感染的相似能力,或者驱动不同潜伏期建立的慢病毒谱系之间是否存在差异,这些差异可以被利用来开发更好的潜伏期逆转剂。研究 HIV-1 和 HIV-2 患者中病毒 RNA/DNA 比值的研究表明,HIV-2 确实更倾向于建立潜伏感染,我们发现,至少部分原因是 HIV-2 Nef 蛋白。因此,报道的 Nef 介导的对宿主细胞激活的影响也会影响潜伏期的建立,并且携带不同慢病毒 nef 基因的 HIV-1 载体应该成为开发更好地理解 HIV-1 潜伏期建立的生物分子基础的关键工具。