Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e221875. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1875.
In 2016, the US Preventive Services Task Force newly recommended universal screening for depression, with the expectation that screening would be associated with appropriate treatment. Few studies have been able to assess the population-based trajectory from screening to receipt of follow-up and treatment for individuals with depression.
To examine adherence to guidelines for follow-up and treatment among primary care patients who newly screened positive for depression in the Veterans Health Administration (VA).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used VA electronic data to identify patients who newly screened positive for depression on the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire at 82 primary care VA clinics in California, Arizona, and New Mexico between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2019. Data analysis was performed from December 2020 to August 2021.
Receipt of guideline-concordant care for screen-positive patients who were determined by clinicians as having depression was assessed. Timely follow-up (within 84 days of screening) was defined as receiving 3 or more mental health specialty visits, 3 or more psychotherapy visits, or 3 or more primary care visits with a depression diagnosis according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. Completing at least minimal treatment (within 12 months) was defined as having 60 days or more of antidepressant prescriptions filled, 4 or more mental health specialty visits, or 3 or more psychotherapy visits.
The final cohort included 607 730 veterans (mean [SD] age, 59.4 [18.2] years; 546 516 men [89.9%]; 339 811 non-Hispanic White [55.9%]); 8%, or 82 998 of 997 185 person-years, newly screened positive for depression. Clinicians identified fewer than half with depression (15 155 patients), of whom 32% (5034 of 15 650 person-years) met treatment guidelines for timely follow-up and 77% (12 026 of 15 650 person-years) completed at least minimal treatment. Younger age (odds ratio, 0.990; 95% CI, 0.986-0.993; P < .001), Black race (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, CI 1.05-1.34; P = .01), and having comorbid psychiatric diagnoses were significantly associated with timely follow-up. Individual quality metric components (eg, medication or psychotherapy) were associated differently with overall quality results among patient groups, except for age.
In this cohort study, most patients met the guidelines for completing at least minimal treatment, but only a minority received timely follow-up after screening positive and being identified as having depression. More research is needed to understand whether the discrepancy between patients who screened positive and patients identified as having depression reflects a gap in recognition of needed care.
2016 年,美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)新推荐对抑郁症进行普遍筛查,预计筛查将与适当的治疗相关。很少有研究能够评估从筛查到接受抑郁症患者的后续治疗的基于人群的轨迹。
评估在退伍军人事务部(VA)中,新筛查出抑郁症呈阳性的初级保健患者中,遵循指南进行后续治疗的情况。
设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用 VA 电子数据,从 2015 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 9 月 30 日,在加利福尼亚、亚利桑那和新墨西哥州的 82 个初级保健 VA 诊所中,对新筛查出抑郁症阳性的患者进行了 2 项患者健康问卷(PHQ-2)。数据分析于 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 8 月进行。
评估了临床医生确定患有抑郁症的筛查阳性患者接受符合指南的治疗情况。及时随访(筛查后 84 天内)被定义为根据国际疾病分类和相关健康问题第十次修订版(ICD-10),接受 3 次或更多次精神科专科就诊、3 次或更多次心理治疗就诊或 3 次或更多次以抑郁症为诊断的初级保健就诊。完成至少最低治疗(12 个月内)被定义为接受 60 天或以上的抗抑郁药处方、4 次或以上精神科专科就诊或 3 次或以上心理治疗就诊。
最终队列包括 607730 名退伍军人(平均[SD]年龄,59.4[18.2]岁;546516 名男性[89.9%];339811 名非西班牙裔白人[55.9%]),8%(997185 人年中的 82998 人)新筛查出抑郁症阳性。临床医生确定的抑郁症患者不到一半(15155 名),其中 32%(15650 人年中的 5034 人)符合及时随访的治疗指南,77%(15650 人年中的 12026 人)完成了至少最低治疗。年龄较小(比值比,0.990;95%CI,0.986-0.993;P<0.001)、黑人种族(比值比,1.19;95%CI,1.05-1.34;P=0.01)和合并精神病诊断与及时随访显著相关。个别质量指标成分(例如,药物或心理治疗)与患者群体的总体质量结果相关不同,除了年龄。
在这项队列研究中,大多数患者符合完成至少最低治疗的标准,但只有少数患者在筛查阳性并被确定患有抑郁症后接受了及时的随访。需要进一步研究以了解筛查呈阳性的患者与被确定患有抑郁症的患者之间的差异是否反映了对所需护理的认识差距。