Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research - Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1283-1291. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4297-2. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
Depression is prevalent and costly, but despite effective treatments, is often untreated. Recent efforts to improve depression care have focused on primary care settings. Disparities in treatment initiation for depression have been reported, with fewer minority and older individuals starting treatment.
To describe patient characteristics associated with depression treatment initiation and treatment choice (antidepressant medications or psychotherapy) among patients newly diagnosed with depression in primary care settings.
A retrospective observational design was used to analyze electronic health record data.
A total of 241,251 adults newly diagnosed with depression in primary care settings among five health care systems from 2010 to 2013.
ICD-9 codes for depression, following a 365-day period with no depression diagnosis or treatment, were used to identify new depression episodes. Treatment initiation was defined as a completed psychotherapy visit or a filled prescription for antidepressant medication within 90 days of diagnosis. Depression severity was measured with Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores on the day of diagnosis.
Overall, 35.7% of patients with newly diagnosed depression initiated treatment. The odds of treatment initiation among Asians, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics were at least 30% lower than among non-Hispanic whites, controlling for all other variables. The odds of patients aged ≥ 60 years starting treatment were half those of patients age 44 years and under. Treatment initiation increased with depression severity, but was only 53% among patients with a PHQ-9 score of ≥ 10. Among minority patients, psychotherapy was initiated significantly more often than medication.
Screening for depression in primary care is a positive step towards improving detection, treatment, and outcomes for depression. However, study results indicate that treatment initiation remains suboptimal, and disparities persist. A better understanding of patient factors, and particularly system-level factors, that influence treatment initiation is needed to inform efforts by heath care systems to improve depression treatment engagement and to reduce disparities.
抑郁症普遍存在且代价高昂,但尽管有有效的治疗方法,这种疾病仍常常得不到治疗。最近,为了改善抑郁症的护理工作,人们的注意力集中在基层医疗环境中。据报道,在开始治疗抑郁症方面存在差异,少数民族和老年人开始治疗的人数较少。
描述在基层医疗环境中刚被诊断出患有抑郁症的患者中,与开始治疗抑郁症和治疗选择(抗抑郁药物或心理治疗)相关的患者特征。
使用回顾性观察设计来分析电子健康记录数据。
共有 241251 名成年人在五个医疗保健系统中于 2010 年至 2013 年期间首次被诊断出患有抑郁症。
在没有抑郁症诊断或治疗的 365 天之后,使用 ICD-9 抑郁症代码来识别新的抑郁症发作。治疗开始被定义为在诊断后 90 天内完成一次心理治疗就诊或开出处方的抗抑郁药物。在诊断当天使用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)评分来测量抑郁症的严重程度。
总体而言,35.7%的新诊断为抑郁症的患者开始接受治疗。控制所有其他变量后,与非西班牙裔白人相比,亚裔、非西班牙裔黑人、和西班牙裔患者开始治疗的可能性至少低 30%。60 岁及以上患者开始治疗的可能性是 44 岁及以下患者的一半。随着抑郁症严重程度的增加,开始治疗的可能性也会增加,但 PHQ-9 评分≥10 的患者中仅有 53%开始治疗。在少数民族患者中,心理治疗的启动率明显高于药物治疗。
在基层医疗保健中对抑郁症进行筛查是改善抑郁症检测、治疗和结果的积极步骤。然而,研究结果表明,治疗开始的情况仍不理想,而且差异仍然存在。需要更好地了解影响治疗开始的患者因素,特别是系统因素,以为医疗保健系统改进抑郁症治疗参与度和减少差异提供信息。