Nestlé Research Center, 1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nestlé Health Science, 1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nutrients. 2022 Mar 7;14(5):1123. doi: 10.3390/nu14051123.
The complexity of the carbohydrate structure is associated with post-prandial glucose response and diverse health benefits. The aim of this study was to determine whether, thanks to the usage of minimally invasive glucose monitors, it was possible to evaluate, in a decentralized study setup, the post-prandial glycemic response (PPGR) of α-glucans differing systematically in their degree of polymerization (DP 3 vs. DP 60) and in their linkage structure (dextrin vs. dextran). Ten healthy subjects completed a double-blind, randomized, decentralized crossover trial, testing at home, in real life conditions, four self-prepared test beverages consisting of 25 g α-glucan dissolved in 300 mL water. The incremental area under the curve of the 120 min PPGR (2h-iAUC) was the highest for Dextrin DP 3 (163 ± 27 mmol/L*min), followed by Dextrin DP 60 (-25%, = 0.208), Dextran DP 60 (-59%, = 0.002), and non-fully caloric Resistant Dextrin (-68%, = 0.002). These results show that a fully decentralized crossover study can be successfully used to assess the influence of both polymerization and structure of α-glucans on PPGR.
碳水化合物结构的复杂性与餐后血糖反应和多种健康益处有关。本研究旨在确定,是否由于使用微创血糖监测仪,可以在分散的研究设置中评估聚合度(3 vs. 60)和连接结构(糊精 vs. 葡聚糖)上系统差异的α-葡聚糖的餐后血糖反应(PPGR)。10 名健康受试者完成了一项双盲、随机、分散交叉试验,在家中、真实生活条件下测试了由 25 g α-葡聚糖溶解在 300 mL 水中组成的四种自制测试饮料。120 分钟 PPGR 的增量面积(2h-iAUC)以糊精 DP 3(163 ± 27 mmol/L*min)最高,其次是糊精 DP 60(-25%, = 0.208)、葡聚糖 DP 60(-59%, = 0.002)和非完全热量抗性糊精(-68%, = 0.002)。这些结果表明,完全分散的交叉研究可成功用于评估α-葡聚糖的聚合度和结构对 PPGR 的影响。