• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于材料挤出成型的外科植入模板制造及精度分析。

Material Extrusion Based Fabrication of Surgical Implant Template and Accuracy Analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Chengyu, Yuan Yanping, Chen Jimin

机构信息

Beijing Engineering Research Center of 3D Printing for Digital Medical Health, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.

Beijing International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of 3D Printing for Digital Medical Health, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 25;15(5):1738. doi: 10.3390/ma15051738.

DOI:10.3390/ma15051738
PMID:35268972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8911434/
Abstract

An implant template with great precision is significantly critical for clinical application. Currently, the application of an immediate implant remains limited by the deviations between the planned and actual achieved positions and long periods required for preparation of implant templates. Material Extrusion (MEX), as one kind of 3D printing method, is well known for its low cost and easy operation. However, the accuracy of the implant template printed by MEX has not been fully researched. To investigate the accuracy and feasibility of in vitro computer-guided surgery assisted with a MEX printed template, unidentified plaster samples missing a maxillary molar are digitalized. Mimics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) is used for preoperative design. Surgical templates are fabricated by a MEX 3D printer (Lingtong III, Beijing SHINO, Beijing, China). Postoperative CBCT data are obtained after surgical template placement. The differences in positions of X, Y, Z, and dXYZ as well as angulations between the placed and the designed template are measured on labiolingual and mesiodistal planes. The deviations of the planned and the actual outcome in each dimension are observed and analyzed. Data from different samples indicate that the mean deviation of the angle measures approximately 3.640°. For position deviation, the maximum deviation is found in the z-direction and the mean deviation is about 0.365 ± 0.136 mm. The mean deviation of space Euclidean distance dXYZ is approximately 0.537 ± 0.123 mm. Implant templates fabricated by MEX present a relatively high accuracy for tooth-supported guide implantation.

摘要

具有高精度的种植体模板对于临床应用至关重要。目前,即刻种植的应用仍受限于计划位置与实际到达位置之间的偏差以及种植体模板制备所需的较长时间。材料挤出(MEX)作为一种3D打印方法,以其低成本和易操作而闻名。然而,通过MEX打印的种植体模板的准确性尚未得到充分研究。为了研究体外计算机引导手术辅助MEX打印模板的准确性和可行性,对上颌磨牙缺失的未识别石膏样本进行数字化处理。使用Mimics软件(Materialise,比利时鲁汶)进行术前设计。手术模板由MEX 3D打印机(灵通III,北京创鑫,中国北京)制造。在放置手术模板后获取术后CBCT数据。在唇舌侧和近远中平面上测量放置的模板与设计模板之间在X、Y、Z位置以及dXYZ的差异以及角度。观察并分析每个维度上计划结果与实际结果的偏差。来自不同样本的数据表明,角度的平均偏差约为3.640°。对于位置偏差,最大偏差出现在z方向,平均偏差约为0.365±0.136毫米。空间欧几里得距离dXYZ的平均偏差约为0.537±0.123毫米。通过MEX制造的种植体模板在牙支持式引导种植方面具有较高的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/6200d10e9683/materials-15-01738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/e5aa76040ed0/materials-15-01738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/e8bffac476fb/materials-15-01738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/867c0979784d/materials-15-01738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/1ca1846a94cd/materials-15-01738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/097c242b113c/materials-15-01738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/6200d10e9683/materials-15-01738-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/e5aa76040ed0/materials-15-01738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/e8bffac476fb/materials-15-01738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/867c0979784d/materials-15-01738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/1ca1846a94cd/materials-15-01738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/097c242b113c/materials-15-01738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11e1/8911434/6200d10e9683/materials-15-01738-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Material Extrusion Based Fabrication of Surgical Implant Template and Accuracy Analysis.基于材料挤出成型的外科植入模板制造及精度分析。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 25;15(5):1738. doi: 10.3390/ma15051738.
2
Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study.不同种植体系统的 3D 打印种植导板的准确性和精度:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jun;123(6):821-828. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
3
Accuracy of a chairside fused deposition modeling 3D-printed single-tooth surgical template for implant placement: An in vitro comparison with a light cured template.椅旁熔融沉积成型 3D 打印单颗牙种植手术模板准确性的体外研究:与光固化模板的对比
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Aug;47(8):1216-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
4
The impact of the fabrication method on the three-dimensional accuracy of an implant surgery template.制作方法对种植手术模板三维精度的影响。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;45(6):804-808. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
5
Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.不同 3D 打印机制作 CAD-CAM 外科模板引导种植精度的比较:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jun;125(6):905-910. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
6
In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.使用桌面立体光刻打印机制作的体内牙支持式种植手术导板:完全引导手术比部分引导手术更精确。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul;76(7):1431-1439. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
7
The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.手术导板固定和种植体位置对静态计算机辅助种植手术精度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):155-164. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13371. Epub 2021 May 10.
8
An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of 3D Printing Orientation on the Accuracy of Implant Surgical Templates Fabricated By Desktop Printer.3D打印方向对桌面打印机制造的种植手术模板精度影响的体外评估
J Prosthodont. 2022 Dec;31(9):791-798. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13485. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
9
Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.比较使用增材和减材技术制作的外科导板的种植体位置准确性。
J Prosthodont. 2020 Jul;29(6):534-541. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13161. Epub 2020 May 6.
10
Computer-assisted template-guided custom-designed 3D-printed implant placement with custom-designed 3D-printed surgical tooling: an in-vitro proof of a novel concept.使用定制设计的3D打印手术工具进行计算机辅助模板引导的定制设计3D打印植入物植入:一种新概念的体外验证。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May;28(5):582-585. doi: 10.1111/clr.12838. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Additive manufacturing technologies in the oral implant clinic: A review of current applications and progress.口腔种植临床中的增材制造技术:当前应用与进展综述
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jan 20;11:1100155. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1100155. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.不同 3D 打印机制作 CAD-CAM 外科模板引导种植精度的比较:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jun;125(6):905-910. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
2
Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides.计算机引导种植手术与个体化导板精度评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Feb;125(2):266-272. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.010. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro.
体外单牙预备实际口内扫描系统的局部准确性。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Feb;151(2):127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.10.022. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
4
Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.一种简化的3D打印种植手术导板的准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Aug;124(2):195-201.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
5
Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: An in vitro study.不同种植体系统的 3D 打印种植导板的准确性和精度:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jun;123(6):821-828. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
6
Accuracy of a chairside fused deposition modeling 3D-printed single-tooth surgical template for implant placement: An in vitro comparison with a light cured template.椅旁熔融沉积成型 3D 打印单颗牙种植手术模板准确性的体外研究:与光固化模板的对比
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Aug;47(8):1216-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
7
Accuracy of computer-guided implant placement in anterior regions.计算机引导种植体在前牙区的准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 May;121(5):836-842. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
8
In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.引导式与徒手式种植体植入的体外比较:使用新型组合式TRIOS表面扫描、种植体工作室、锥形束CT以及立体光刻虚拟规划与引导技术
Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(2):87-95.
9
Polylactic Acid as a Material for Three-Dimensional Printing of Provisional Restorations.聚乳酸作为临时修复体三维打印的材料。
Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Jul/Aug;31(4):349-350. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5709.
10
How Accurate Are Implant Surgical Guides Produced With Desktop Stereolithographic 3-Dimentional Printers?使用桌面立体光刻三维打印机制作的种植手术导板有多精确?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Dec;75(12):2559.e1-2559.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 5.