Department of Urology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Urologie 24, St Theresien Hospital, Nuremberg, Germany.
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;40(19):2128-2137. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02631. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
Several anti-programmed cell death (ligand)-1 (PD-[L]1) immune checkpoint inhibitors are approved in advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Recently, improved activity of an anti-PD-1/anticytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (CTLA-4) combination versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy has been reported. We report a response-based approach starting treatment with nivolumab monotherapy with nivolumab/ipilimumab as immunotherapeutic boost.
After four doses of nivolumab induction, responders continued with nivolumab maintenance therapy. Patients with stable/progressive disease received nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 2 doses followed by nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 2 doses, if not responding to the initial boost. Responders to boosts continued with nivolumab maintenance. Between July 2017 and April 2019, 86 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up is 7.7 months. The primary end point is objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Secondary end points include efficacy of nivolumab induction, remission rate with nivolumab/ipilimumab boosts, overall survival, and safety.
Of all patients, 42, 39, and five were first- (1L), second- (2L), and third-line (3L), respectively. The median age was 68 years. The ORR with nivolumab monotherapy (assessed at week 8) was 29% in 1L and 23% in 2/3L, respectively. Forty-one patients received early (week 8) and 11 received later nivolumab/ipilimumab boosts. ORRs with nivolumab with or without nivolumab/ipilimumab (best overall response) were 45% and 27% in 1L and 2/3L, respectively. In 1L, 7 of 17 patients receiving boosts at week 8 improved, compared with 2 of 24 in 2/3L.
The tailored approach of TITAN-TCC shows meaningful clinical activity supporting dual checkpoint inhibition in 1L mUC. However, starting therapy with nivolumab exclusively appears inadequate given the aggressive nature of mUC. In 2/3L, nivolumab/ipilimumab boosts with escalating ipilimumab dose did not improve efficacy outcomes versus nivolumab monotherapy. An independent 2L cohort of TITAN-TCC receiving nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 4 doses is ongoing.
几种抗程序性细胞死亡(配体)-1(PD-[L]1)免疫检查点抑制剂已在晚期/转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)中获得批准。最近,报道了抗 PD-1/抗细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞相关抗原 4(CTLA-4)联合用药的活性优于抗 PD-1 单药治疗。我们报告了一种基于反应的方法,起始治疗为纳武单抗单药治疗,随后进行纳武单抗/伊匹单抗免疫治疗增强。
纳武单抗诱导治疗 4 个剂量后,缓解者继续接受纳武单抗维持治疗。疾病稳定/进展的患者接受纳武单抗 3 mg/kg 加伊匹单抗 1 mg/kg 每 3 周 1 次,共 2 个剂量,然后接受纳武单抗 1 mg/kg 加伊匹单抗 3 mg/kg 每 3 周 1 次,共 2 个剂量,如果初始增强治疗无反应。增强治疗的缓解者继续接受纳武单抗维持治疗。2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 4 月,共纳入 86 例患者。中位随访时间为 7.7 个月。主要终点为 RECIST1.1 评估的客观缓解率(ORR)。次要终点包括纳武单抗诱导的疗效、纳武单抗/伊匹单抗增强的缓解率、总生存期和安全性。
所有患者中,1 线(1L)、2 线(2L)和 3 线(3L)分别为 42、39 和 5 例。中位年龄为 68 岁。纳武单抗单药治疗(评估至第 8 周)的 ORR 分别为 1L 为 29%,2/3L 为 23%。41 例患者接受了早期(第 8 周)和 11 例患者接受了后期纳武单抗/伊匹单抗增强治疗。纳武单抗联合或不联合纳武单抗/伊匹单抗(最佳总体缓解)的 ORR 分别为 1L 为 45%和 27%,2/3L 为 27%。在 1L 中,17 例接受第 8 周增强治疗的患者中有 7 例缓解,而 24 例 2/3L 患者中有 2 例缓解。
TITAN-TCC 的定制方法显示出有意义的临床活性,支持 1L mUC 的双重检查点抑制。然而,鉴于 mUC 的侵袭性,仅用纳武单抗起始治疗似乎是不够的。在 2/3L 中,与纳武单抗单药治疗相比,伊匹单抗剂量递增的纳武单抗/伊匹单抗增强治疗并不能改善疗效。正在进行 TITAN-TCC 的一个独立 2L 队列,该队列接受纳武单抗 1 mg/kg 加伊匹单抗 3 mg/kg 每 3 周 1 次,共 4 个剂量。