Suppr超能文献

支持 0 至 48 个月儿童维生素 A 需求量和最高摄入量的证据:范围综述。

Evidence to Underpin Vitamin A Requirements and Upper Limits in Children Aged 0 to 48 Months: A Scoping Review.

机构信息

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.

School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 Jan 18;14(3):407. doi: 10.3390/nu14030407.

Abstract

Vitamin A deficiency is a major health risk for infants and children in low- and middle-income countries. This scoping review identified, quantified, and mapped research for use in updating nutrient requirements and upper limits for vitamin A in children aged 0 to 48 months, using health-based or modelling-based approaches. Structured searches were run on Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central, from inception to 19 March 2021. Titles and abstracts were assessed independently in duplicate, as were 20% of full texts. Included studies were tabulated by question, methodology and date, with the most relevant data extracted and assessed for risk of bias. We found that the most recent health-based systematic reviews and trials assessed the effects of supplementation, though some addressed the effects of staple food fortification, complementary foods, biofortified maize or cassava, and fortified drinks, on health outcomes. Recent isotopic tracer studies and modelling approaches may help quantify the effects of bio-fortification, fortification, and food-based approaches for increasing vitamin A depots. A systematic review and several trials identified adverse events associated with higher vitamin A intakes, which should be useful for setting upper limits. We have generated and provide a database of relevant research. Full systematic reviews, based on this scoping review, are needed to answer specific questions to set vitamin A requirements and upper limits.

摘要

维生素 A 缺乏是中低收入国家婴幼儿面临的主要健康风险。本范围界定审查通过基于健康或基于模型的方法,确定、量化并绘制了用于更新 0 至 48 月龄儿童维生素 A 营养需求和上限的研究,这些研究使用了基于健康或基于模型的方法。从创建到 2021 年 3 月 19 日,在 Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Central 上进行了结构化搜索。标题和摘要由两人独立评估,20%的全文也由两人独立评估。将纳入的研究按问题、方法和日期进行列表,并提取最相关的数据进行偏倚风险评估。我们发现,最近的基于健康的系统评价和试验评估了补充剂的效果,尽管有些研究涉及主食强化、补充食品、生物强化玉米或木薯以及强化饮料对健康结果的影响。最近的同位素示踪研究和建模方法可能有助于量化生物强化、强化和基于食物的方法对增加维生素 A 储存的效果。一项系统评价和几项试验确定了与较高维生素 A 摄入量相关的不良事件,这对于设定上限很有用。我们已经生成并提供了相关研究数据库。需要基于本次范围界定审查进行全面的系统评价,以回答具体问题,确定维生素 A 的需求和上限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a04/8840537/e56e1fca7c56/nutrients-14-00407-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验