• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fortification of staple foods with vitamin A for vitamin A deficiency.通过在主食中强化维生素A来应对维生素A缺乏症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 10;5(5):CD010068. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010068.pub2.
2
Fortification of maize flour with iron for controlling anaemia and iron deficiency in populations.通过强化玉米粉中的铁元素来控制人群中的贫血和缺铁情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 22;12(12):CD010187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010187.pub2.
3
Fortification of wheat and maize flour with folic acid for population health outcomes.用叶酸强化小麦粉和玉米粉以改善人群健康状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 1;7(7):CD012150. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012150.pub2.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Iodine fortification of foods and condiments, other than salt, for preventing iodine deficiency disorders.除盐之外,对食品和调味品进行碘强化以预防碘缺乏病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 12;2(2):CD010734. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010734.pub2.
6
Fortification of rice with vitamins and minerals for addressing micronutrient malnutrition.通过在大米中强化维生素和矿物质来解决微量营养素营养不良问题。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 25;2019(10):CD009902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009902.pub2.
7
Fortification of staple foods with zinc for improving zinc status and other health outcomes in the general population.通过主食强化锌来改善普通人群的锌营养状况及其他健康指标。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 9;2016(6):CD010697. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010697.pub2.
8
Wheat flour fortification with iron for reducing anaemia and improving iron status in populations.通过添加铁强化小麦粉来减少人群贫血并改善铁营养状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 17;7(7):CD011302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011302.pub2.
9
Fortification of condiments and seasonings with iron for preventing anaemia and improving health.用铁强化调味品和调味料以预防贫血和改善健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):CD009604. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009604.pub2.
10
Wheat flour fortification with iron and other micronutrients for reducing anaemia and improving iron status in populations.小麦粉强化铁和其他微量营养素以减少人群贫血和改善铁营养状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 18;1(1):CD011302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011302.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Evaluation of How Indicators of Inequity and Disadvantage Are Measured and Reported in Population Health Evidence Syntheses.人口健康证据综合研究中不平等和劣势指标测量与报告方式的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 29;22(6):851. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060851.
2
Antioxidants: a comprehensive review.抗氧化剂:全面综述。
Arch Toxicol. 2025 May;99(5):1893-1997. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-03997-2. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
3
Evaluating the effectiveness and risks of bread fortification programs in the middle eastern region: a comprehensive review.评估中东地区面包强化计划的有效性和风险:一项综合综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 11;13:1530380. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1530380. eCollection 2025.
4
Trend and Burden of Vitamin A Deficiency in 1990-2021 and Projection to 2050: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.1990 - 2021年维生素A缺乏症的趋势与负担及到2050年的预测:全球疾病负担研究2021的系统分析
Nutrients. 2025 Feb 4;17(3):572. doi: 10.3390/nu17030572.
5
Food and nutrient intake among non-pregnant, non-lactating women of reproductive age of Mbeya in Tanzania: A repeated 24-hour dietary recall.坦桑尼亚姆贝亚地区非孕、非哺乳期育龄妇女的食物和营养摄入情况:重复24小时膳食回顾调查
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;4(12):e0004010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004010. eCollection 2024.
6
Identifying molecular targets for modulating carotenoid accumulation in rice grains.鉴定调控水稻籽粒类胡萝卜素积累的分子靶点。
Biochem Biophys Rep. 2024 Sep 6;40:101815. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101815. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
The Policy of Compulsory Large-Scale Food Fortification in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲的强制性大规模食品强化政策。
Foods. 2024 Aug 1;13(15):2438. doi: 10.3390/foods13152438.
8
Vitamin A deficiency in the MENA region: a 30-year analysis (1990-2019).中东和北非地区的维生素A缺乏症:一项30年分析(1990 - 2019年)
Front Nutr. 2024 Jun 6;11:1413617. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1413617. eCollection 2024.
9
Establishment of Reference Range for Serum Concentration of Vitamin A and Vitamin E in Southern Sichuan Area of China.建立中国川南地区血清维生素 A 和维生素 E 浓度参考范围。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2024 May;38(10):e25074. doi: 10.1002/jcla.25074. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
10
Biofortification as a solution for addressing nutrient deficiencies and malnutrition.生物强化作为解决营养缺乏和营养不良问题的一种方法。
Heliyon. 2024 May 1;10(9):e30595. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30595. eCollection 2024 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Fortification of rice with vitamins and minerals for addressing micronutrient malnutrition.通过在大米中强化维生素和矿物质来解决微量营养素营养不良问题。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 25;2019(10):CD009902. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009902.pub2.
2
Risk of excessive intake of vitamins and minerals delivered through public health interventions: objectives, results, conclusions of the meeting, and the way forward.通过公共卫生干预措施摄入过量维生素和矿物质的风险:会议目标、结果、结论及前进方向。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 Jun;1446(1):5-20. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13975. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
3
Effect of multiple micronutrient fortified milk consumption on vitamin D status among school-aged children in rural region of Morocco.强化多种微量营养素牛奶的消费对摩洛哥农村地区学龄儿童维生素 D 状况的影响。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019 May;44(5):461-467. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0368. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
Overlapping vitamin A interventions in the United States, Guatemala, Zambia, and South Africa: case studies.美国、危地马拉、赞比亚和南非重叠的维生素 A 干预措施:案例研究。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 Jun;1446(1):102-116. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13965. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
5
Point-of-use fortification of foods with micronutrient powders containing iron in children of preschool and school-age.在学龄前和学龄儿童中使用含微量营养素粉(含铁)对食物进行即用型强化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 23;11(11):CD009666. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009666.pub2.
6
Retail Sugar From One Zambian Community Does Not Meet Statutory Requirements for Vitamin A Fortification.赞比亚某社区的零售糖不符合维生素A强化的法定要求。
Food Nutr Bull. 2017 Dec;38(4):594-598. doi: 10.1177/0379572117733841. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
7
Vitamin A supplements for reducing mother-to-child HIV transmission.用于降低母婴传播艾滋病毒的维生素A补充剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD003648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003648.pub4.
8
Impact of fortified versus unfortified lipid-based supplements on morbidity and nutritional status: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial in ill Gambian children.强化与未强化的脂质基补充剂对发病率和营养状况的影响:冈比亚患病儿童的一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验
PLoS Med. 2017 Aug 15;14(8):e1002377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002377. eCollection 2017 Aug.
9
Double Fortified Salt Intervention Improved Iron Intake But Not Energy and Other Nutrient Intakes in Female Tea Plantation Workers From West Bengal, India.双重强化盐干预改善了印度西孟加拉邦女性茶园工人的铁摄入量,但未改善能量和其他营养素的摄入量。
Food Nutr Bull. 2017 Sep;38(3):369-383. doi: 10.1177/0379572117718121. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
10
Milestones and controversies in maternal and child health: examining a brief history of micronutrient fortification in the US.母婴健康的里程碑与争议:审视美国微量营养素强化简史
J Perinatol. 2017 Nov;37(11):1180-1184. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.121. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

通过在主食中强化维生素A来应对维生素A缺乏症。

Fortification of staple foods with vitamin A for vitamin A deficiency.

作者信息

Hombali Aditi S, Solon Juan Antonio, Venkatesh Bhumika T, Nair N Sreekumaran, Peña-Rosas Juan Pablo

机构信息

Department of Research, Institute of Mental Health, Block 7, Buangkok View, Buangkok Green Medical Park, Singapore, Singapore, 539747.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 10;5(5):CD010068. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010068.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD010068.pub2
PMID:31074495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6509778/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vitamin A deficiency is a significant public health problem in many low- and middle-income countries, especially affecting young children, women of reproductive age, and pregnant women. Fortification of staple foods with vitamin A has been used to increase vitamin A consumption among these groups.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of fortifying staple foods with vitamin A for reducing vitamin A deficiency and improving health-related outcomes in the general population older than two years of age.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following international databases with no language or date restrictions: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 6) in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE and MEDLINE In Process OVID; Embase OVID; CINAHL Ebsco; Web of Science (ISI) SCI, SSCI, CPCI-exp and CPCI-SSH; BIOSIS (ISI); POPLINE; Bibliomap; TRoPHI; ASSIA (Proquest); IBECS; SCIELO; Global Index Medicus - AFRO and EMRO; LILACS; PAHO; WHOLIS; WPRO; IMSEAR; IndMED; and Native Health Research Database. We also searched clinicaltrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify ongoing and unpublished studies. The date of the last search was 19 July 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included individually or cluster-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in this review. The intervention included fortification of staple foods (sugar, edible oils, edible fats, maize flour or corn meal, wheat flour, milk and dairy products, and condiments and seasonings) with vitamin A alone or in combination with other vitamins and minerals. We included the general population older than two years of age (including pregnant and lactating women) from any country.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened and assessed eligibility of studies for inclusion, extracted data from included studies and assessed their risk of bias. We used standard Cochrane methodology to carry out the review.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 randomised controlled trials involving 4455 participants. All the studies were conducted in low- and upper-middle income countries where vitamin A deficiency was a public health issue. One of the included trials did not contribute data to the outcomes of interest.Three trials compared provision of staple foods fortified with vitamin A versus unfortified staple food, five trials compared provision of staple foods fortified with vitamin A plus other micronutrients versus unfortified staple foods, and two trials compared provision of staple foods fortified with vitamin A plus other micronutrients versus no intervention. No studies compared staple foods fortified with vitamin A alone versus no intervention.The duration of interventions ranged from three to nine months. We assessed six studies at high risk of bias overall. Government organisations, non-governmental organisations, the private sector, and academic institutions funded the included studies; funding source does not appear to have distorted the results.Staple food fortified with vitamin A versus unfortified staple food We are uncertain whether fortifying staple foods with vitamin A alone makes little or no difference for serum retinol concentration (mean difference (MD) 0.03 μmol/L, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.12; 3 studies, 1829 participants; I² = 90%, very low-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether vitamin A alone reduces the risk of subclinical vitamin A deficiency (risk ratio (RR) 0.45, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.05; 2 studies; 993 participants; I² = 33%, very low-certainty evidence). The certainty of the evidence was mainly affected by risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency.It is uncertain whether vitamin A fortification reduces clinical vitamin A deficiency, defined as night blindness (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.98; 1 study, 581 participants, very low-certainty evidence). The certainty of the evidence was mainly affected by imprecision, inconsistency, and risk of bias.Staple foods fortified with vitamin A versus no intervention No studies provided data for this comparison.Staple foods fortified with vitamin A plus other micronutrients versus same unfortified staple foods Fortifying staple foods with vitamin A plus other micronutrients may not increase the serum retinol concentration (MD 0.08 μmol/L, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.22; 4 studies; 1009 participants; I² = 95%, low-certainty evidence). The certainty of the evidence was mainly affected by serious inconsistency and risk of bias.In comparison to unfortified staple foods, fortification with vitamin A plus other micronutrients probably reduces the risk of subclinical vitamin A deficiency (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.49; 3 studies; 923 participants; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). The certainty of the evidence was mainly affected by serious risk of bias.Staple foods fortified with vitamin A plus other micronutrients versus no interventionFortification of staple foods with vitamin A plus other micronutrients may increase serum retinol concentration (MD 0.22 μmol/L, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.30; 2 studies; 318 participants; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence). When compared to no intervention, it is uncertain whether the intervention reduces the risk of subclinical vitamin A deficiency (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.98; 2 studies; 318 participants; I² = 0%; very low-certainty evidence) . The certainty of the evidence was affected mainly by serious imprecision and risk of bias.No trials reported on the outcomes of all-cause morbidity, all-cause mortality, adverse effects, food intake, congenital anomalies (for pregnant women), or breast milk concentration (for lactating women).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Fortifying staple foods with vitamin A alone may make little or no difference to serum retinol concentrations or the risk of subclinical vitamin A deficiency. In comparison with provision of unfortified foods, provision of staple foods fortified with vitamin A plus other micronutrients may not increase serum retinol concentration but probably reduces the risk of subclinical vitamin A deficiency.Compared to no intervention, staple foods fortified with vitamin A plus other micronutrients may increase serum retinol concentration, although it is uncertain whether the intervention reduces the risk of subclinical vitamin A deficiency as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low.It was not possible to estimate the effect of staple food fortification on outcomes such as mortality, morbidity, adverse effects, congenital anomalies, or breast milk vitamin A, as no trials included these outcomes.The type of funding source for the studies did not appear to distort the results from the analysis.

摘要

背景

维生素A缺乏是许多低收入和中等收入国家的一个重大公共卫生问题,尤其影响幼儿、育龄妇女和孕妇。用维生素A强化主食已被用于增加这些人群的维生素A摄入量。

目的

评估用维生素A强化主食对降低维生素A缺乏及改善两岁以上普通人群健康相关结局的效果。

检索方法

我们检索了以下无语言或日期限制的国际数据库:Cochrane图书馆中的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL;2018年第6期);OVID平台上的MEDLINE及MEDLINE在研数据库;OVID平台上的Embase;Ebsco平台上的CINAHL;Web of Science(ISI)的SCI、SSCI、CPCI - 扩展版和CPCI - SSH版;BIOSIS(ISI);POPLINE;Bibliomap;TRoPHI;ASSIA(Proquest);IBECS;SCIELO;全球医学索引 - 非洲区和东地中海区域办事处;LILACS;泛美卫生组织;世界卫生组织图书馆;西太平洋区域办事处;IMSEAR;印度医学数据库;以及本土健康研究数据库。我们还检索了ClinicalTrials.gov和国际临床试验注册平台以识别正在进行和未发表的研究。最后一次检索日期为2018年7月19日。

选择标准

本综述纳入了个体或整群随机对照试验(RCT)。干预措施包括单独用维生素A或与其他维生素和矿物质联合对主食(糖、食用油、食用脂肪、玉米粉、小麦粉、牛奶及奶制品、调味品和调味料)进行强化。我们纳入了来自任何国家的两岁以上普通人群(包括孕妇和哺乳期妇女)。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立筛选并评估纳入研究的合格性,从纳入研究中提取数据并评估其偏倚风险。我们使用标准的Cochrane方法进行综述。

主要结果

我们纳入了10项随机对照试验,涉及4455名参与者。所有研究均在维生素A缺乏是公共卫生问题的低收入和中高收入国家进行。其中一项纳入试验未提供有关感兴趣结局的数据。三项试验比较了提供维生素A强化主食与未强化主食,五项试验比较了提供维生素A加其他微量营养素强化主食与未强化主食,两项试验比较了提供维生素A加其他微量营养素强化主食与不进行干预。没有研究比较单独用维生素A强化主食与不进行干预。干预持续时间为三至九个月。我们评估六项研究总体存在高偏倚风险。纳入研究由政府组织、非政府组织、私营部门和学术机构资助;资助来源似乎未使结果产生偏差。

维生素A强化主食与未强化主食

单独用维生素A强化主食对血清视黄醇浓度几乎没有影响或影响不大,我们对此不确定(平均差(MD)0.03μmol/L,95%置信区间 -0.06至0.12;3项研究,1829名参与者;I² = 90%,极低确定性证据)。单独用维生素A是否能降低亚临床维生素A缺乏风险尚不确定(风险比(RR)0.45,95%置信区间0.19至1.05;2项研究;993名参与者;I² = 33%,极低确定性证据)。证据的确定性主要受偏倚风险、不精确性和不一致性影响。

维生素A强化是否能降低定义为夜盲症的临床维生素A缺乏尚不确定(RR 0.11,95%置信区间0.01至1.98;1项研究,581名参与者,极低确定性证据)。证据的确定性主要受不精确性、不一致性和偏倚风险影响。

维生素A强化主食与不进行干预

没有研究提供此比较的数据。

维生素A加其他微量营养素强化主食与未强化主食

用维生素A加其他微量营养素强化主食可能不会增加血清视黄醇浓度(MD 0.08μmol/L,95%置信区间 -0.06至0.22;4项研究;1009名参与者;I² = 95%,低确定性证据)。证据的确定性主要受严重不一致性和偏倚风险影响。

与未强化主食相比,用维生素A加其他微量营养素强化主食可能会降低亚临床维生素A缺乏风险(RR 0.27,95%置信区间0.16至0.49;3项研究;923名参与者;I² = 0%;中等确定性证据)。证据的确定性主要受严重偏倚风险影响。

维生素A加其他微量营养素强化主食与不进行干预

用维生素A加其他微量营养素强化主食可能会增加血清视黄醇浓度(MD 0.22μmol/L,95%置信区间0.15至0.30;2项研究;318名参与者;I² = 0%;低确定性证据)。与不进行干预相比,该干预是否能降低亚临床维生素A缺乏风险尚不确定(RR 0.71,95%置信区间0.52至0.98;2项研究;318名参与者;I² = 0%;极低确定性证据)。证据的确定性主要受严重不精确性和偏倚风险影响。

没有试验报告全因发病率、全因死亡率、不良反应、食物摄入量、先天性异常(针对孕妇)或母乳中维生素A浓度(针对哺乳期妇女)的结局。

作者结论

单独用维生素A强化主食对血清视黄醇浓度或亚临床维生素A缺乏风险可能几乎没有影响或影响不大。与提供未强化食物相比,提供维生素A加其他微量营养素强化主食可能不会增加血清视黄醇浓度,但可能会降低亚临床维生素A缺乏风险。

与不进行干预相比,用维生素A加其他微量营养素强化主食可能会增加血清视黄醇浓度,尽管由于证据的确定性被评估为极低,尚不确定该干预是否能降低亚临床维生素A缺乏风险。

由于没有试验纳入这些结局,因此无法估计主食强化对死亡率、发病率、不良反应、先天性异常或母乳中维生素A等结局的影响。

研究的资助来源类型似乎未使分析结果产生偏差。