• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国县级医院药师参与的用药重整评估研究方案:一项多中心、开放标签、评估者盲法、非随机对照研究。

Study protocol for the evaluation of pharmacist-participated medication reconciliation at county hospitals in China: a multicentre, open-label, assessor-blinded, non-randomised, controlled study.

作者信息

Yu Aichen, Wei Guilin, Chen Fanghui, Wang Zining, Fu Mengyuan, Wang Guoying, Wushouer Haishaerjiang, Li Xixi, Guan Xiaodong, Shi Luwen

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Jiangxi, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 11;12(3):e053741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053741.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053741
PMID:35277404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8919460/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacist-participated medication reconciliation proved an effective strategy to decrease the risk of medication discrepancy-related errors. However, it is still under pilot in China and its effectiveness in the Chinese healthcare system remains unclear. This study aims to conduct a pharmacist-participated medication reconciliation intervention for elderly patients in county hospitals in China and to evaluate its effect.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre, prospective, open-label, assessor-blinded, cluster, non-randomised, controlled study for elderly patients. The study will be conducted in seven county hospitals, and the clusters will be hospital wards. In each hospital, two internal medicine wards will be randomly allocated into either intervention group or control group. Patients in the intervention group will receive pharmacist-participated medication reconciliation, and those in the control group will receive standard care. The primary outcome is the incidence of medication discrepancy, and the secondary outcomes are patients' medication adherence, healthcare utilisation and medical costs within 30 days after discharge.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics committee approval of this study was obtained from Peking University Institution Review Board (IRB00001052-21016). We have also obtained ethical approvals from all the participating centres. The findings will be published in scientific and conference presentations.

TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100045668.

摘要

引言

药师参与的用药核对被证明是一种降低用药差异相关错误风险的有效策略。然而,在中国其仍处于试点阶段,在我国医疗体系中的有效性尚不清楚。本研究旨在对我国县级医院的老年患者实施药师参与的用药核对干预并评估其效果。

方法与分析

这是一项针对老年患者的多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、评估者盲法、整群、非随机对照研究。研究将在7家县级医院开展,整群为医院病房。在每家医院,两个内科病房将被随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预组患者将接受药师参与的用药核对,对照组患者将接受标准护理。主要结局是用药差异的发生率,次要结局是患者出院后30天内的用药依从性、医疗服务利用情况和医疗费用。

伦理与传播

本研究已获得北京大学机构审查委员会(IRB00001052 - 21016)的伦理委员会批准。我们也已获得所有参与中心的伦理批准。研究结果将发表在科学期刊及会议报告中。

试验注册号

ChiCTR2100045668。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d729/8919460/68554922cbe6/bmjopen-2021-053741f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d729/8919460/68554922cbe6/bmjopen-2021-053741f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d729/8919460/68554922cbe6/bmjopen-2021-053741f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Study protocol for the evaluation of pharmacist-participated medication reconciliation at county hospitals in China: a multicentre, open-label, assessor-blinded, non-randomised, controlled study.中国县级医院药师参与的用药重整评估研究方案:一项多中心、开放标签、评估者盲法、非随机对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 11;12(3):e053741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053741.
2
Evaluation of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at county hospitals in China: A multicentre, open-label, assessor-blinded, nonrandomised controlled study.中国县级医院开展药师主导的用药重整评估:一项多中心、开放标签、评估者设盲、非随机对照研究。
J Glob Health. 2024 Apr 12;14:04058. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04058.
3
Impact of medication reconciliation and review and counselling, on adverse drug events and healthcare resource use.药物重整、审查与咨询对药物不良事件及医疗资源利用的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1154-1164. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0650-8. Epub 2018 May 12.
4
Implementation and evaluation of a collaborative clinical pharmacist's medications reconciliation and charting service for admitted medical inpatients in a metropolitan hospital.为一家大都市医院的住院内科患者实施并评估临床药师协作的用药核对与医嘱录入服务。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Dec;41(6):662-666. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12442. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
5
Impact of collaborative pharmaceutical care on in-patients' medication safety: study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial (MEDREV study).协作药学服务对住院患者用药安全的影响:一项阶梯楔形整群随机试验的研究方案(MEDREV研究)
Trials. 2018 Jan 8;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2412-7.
6
Bridging the gap between physical and mental illness in community pharmacy (): protocol for an Australian cluster randomised controlled trial.弥合社区药房中身心疾病之间的差距():一项澳大利亚整群随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 23;10(7):e039983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039983.
7
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of a community pharmacy discharge medication reconciliation service on unplanned hospital readmissions - The DCMedsRec trial.一项评估社区药房出院药物核对服务对非计划住院再入院影响的随机对照试验方案——DCMedsRec试验
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Feb;17(2):460-465. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.03.024. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
8
Study protocol for a single-centre, prospective, non-blinded, randomised, 12-month, parallel-group superiority study to compare the efficacy of pharmacist intervention versus usual care for elderly patients hospitalised in orthopaedic wards.一项单中心、前瞻性、非盲法、随机、为期12个月的平行组优效性研究的研究方案,旨在比较药师干预与常规护理对骨科病房老年住院患者的疗效。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 30;8(7):e021924. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021924.
9
Impact of a clinical pharmacist on optimising the quality use of medicines according to the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) secondary prevention guidelines and medication adherence following discharge in patients with ACS in Sri Lanka: a prospective non-randomised controlled trial study protocol.斯里兰卡急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者出院后根据二级预防指南和药物依从性优化药物使用质量的临床药师作用:一项前瞻性非随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 9;13(2):e059413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059413.
10
Effectiveness of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation programmes on clinical outcomes at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药剂师主导的药物重整计划在医院转衔期间对临床结局的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 23;6(2):e010003. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010003.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at county hospitals in China: A multicentre, open-label, assessor-blinded, nonrandomised controlled study.中国县级医院开展药师主导的用药重整评估:一项多中心、开放标签、评估者设盲、非随机对照研究。
J Glob Health. 2024 Apr 12;14:04058. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04058.
2
Effectiveness of Medication Reconciliation in a Chinese Hospital: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.中国一家医院的用药核对有效性:一项试点随机对照试验
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Nov 24;16:3641-3650. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S432522. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Realist research to inform pharmacy practice and policy.为药学实践和政策提供信息的现实主义研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Dec;17(12):2075-2081. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.026. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
2
Simplifying Medication Regimens for People Receiving Community-Based Home Care Services: Outcomes of a Non-Randomized Pilot and Feasibility Study.简化接受社区居家护理服务人群的药物治疗方案:一项非随机试点和可行性研究的结果。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jun 2;15:797-809. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S248377. eCollection 2020.
3
Pharmacist-led intervention to improve medication use in older inpatients using the Drug Burden Index: a study protocol for a before/after intervention with a retrospective control group and multiple case analysis.
药剂师主导的干预措施,使用药物负担指数改善老年住院患者的药物使用情况:一项前后干预研究方案,设有回顾性对照组和多个案例分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e035656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035656.
4
Effect of pharmacy-led medication reconciliation in emergency departments: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药学主导的急诊用药重整的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Dec;44(6):932-945. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13019. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
5
Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at patient discharge: A scoping review.药剂师主导的患者出院时药物重整:范围综述。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 May;16(5):605-613. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Frequency of undocumented medication discrepancies in discharge letters after hospitalization of older patients: a clinical record review study.老年患者住院后出院小结中未记录的用药差异发生率:一项临床记录回顾性研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019 Jun 16;10:2042098619858049. doi: 10.1177/2042098619858049. eCollection 2019.
7
Determinants of inappropriate admissions of children to county hospitals: a cross-sectional study from rural China.中国农村县级医院儿童不适当入院的影响因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 18;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3944-1.
8
Medication discrepancies in late-stage chronic kidney disease.晚期慢性肾脏病中的用药差异
Clin Kidney J. 2018 Aug;11(4):507-512. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx135. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
9
Medication Reconciliation at Discharge from Hospital: A Systematic Review of the Quantitative Literature.医院出院时的用药核对:对定量文献的系统评价
Pharmacy (Basel). 2015 Jun 23;3(2):53-71. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy3020053.
10
Impact of electronic medication reconciliation interventions on medication discrepancies at hospital transitions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.电子药物重整干预对医院转诊时用药差异的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Aug 22;16(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0353-9.