Fares Austin B, Scanaliato John P, Gavalas Anthony, Dunn John C, Czajkowski Hunter, Parnes Nata
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center-El Paso, El Paso, Texas.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center-El Paso, El Paso, Texas.
Arthroscopy. 2022 Sep;38(9):2602-2608. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.02.026. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in a severely obese population (body mass index [BMI] > 0 kg/m) compared to a healthy weight population (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m).
This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data examining the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in both severely obese patients and healthy weight patients. Primary outcome measures analyzed include the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), range of motion, and complications.
A total of 89 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria: 52 healthy weight patients (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m) and 37 severely obese patients (BMI >40 kg/m). Patient-reported pain and functional outcomes had significantly improved after surgery in both groups with regard to the visual analog score (VAS) scores, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) scores (P < .0001). When directly comparing the outcomes in the healthy weight group to the severely obese group, the latter had significantly inferior outcomes in VAS scores (P = .0048), SANE scores (P = .0118), ASES scores (P = .0031), and postoperative internal rotation (P =.0132). At large, these outcomes did not have clinically significant differences. The severely obese group also had higher total numbers of comorbid conditions and longer operative times (P =.0041).
Severely obese patients and their associated comorbid conditions pose unique challenges in rotator cuff tear management, but they still achieve overall excellent outcomes after repair and noninferior clinical differences when compared to healthy weight patients.
Level III, retrospective comparative study.
本研究旨在调查重度肥胖人群(体重指数[BMI]>40kg/m²)与健康体重人群(BMI 18.5-24.9kg/m²)关节镜下肩袖修复的结果。
本研究是一项对前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析,检查重度肥胖患者和健康体重患者关节镜下肩袖修复的结果。分析的主要结局指标包括美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分、单项评估数字评定法(SANE)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、活动范围和并发症。
共有89例患者符合纳入/排除标准:52例健康体重患者(BMI 18.5-24.9kg/m²)和37例重度肥胖患者(BMI>40kg/m²)。两组患者术后在视觉模拟评分(VAS)、单项评估数字评定法(SANE)评分和美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)肩部评分方面,患者报告的疼痛和功能结局均有显著改善(P<.0001)。当直接比较健康体重组和重度肥胖组的结局时,后者在VAS评分(P=.0048)、SANE评分(P=.0118)、ASES评分(P=.0031)和术后内旋(P=.0132)方面的结局明显较差。总体而言,这些结局没有临床显著差异。重度肥胖组的合并症总数也更多,手术时间更长(P=.0041)。
重度肥胖患者及其相关合并症在肩袖撕裂管理中带来了独特的挑战,但与健康体重患者相比,他们在修复后仍能取得总体良好的结局,且临床差异不劣于健康体重患者。
III级,回顾性比较研究。