US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Services, Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, North Dakota.
Division of Nutrition, Institute of Food Safety and Nutrition, Research, Education, and Economics Resources, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Jul;122(7):1345-1354.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
Understanding how vegetables are incorporated into the diet, especially in the types and amounts recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, and how this alters dietary intake patterns is vital for developing targeted behavior change interventions.
To determine how a provision of vegetables was incorporated into the diet of adults with overweight and obesity; whether or not the provided vegetables displaced other foods; and what, if any, effect this had on diet quality and body weight and composition.
This study investigated secondary outcomes from the Motivating Value of Vegetables Study, a community-based, randomized, parallel, nonblinded controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to a provided vegetable intervention or attention control group using a one to one allocation ratio.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Men and women with self-reported low vegetable consumption, aged 18 to 65 years, with a body mass index ≥25 were recruited from Grand Forks, ND, between October 2015 and September 2017. Only participants randomized to the provided vegetable intervention group (n = 51; attrition = 8%) were included in this secondary analysis.
Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommended types and amounts of vegetables were provided weekly for 8 weeks.
How the provided vegetables were incorporated into the diet was measured using daily self-report and 24-hour dietary recalls. Diet quality was assessed via the Healthy Eating Index 2015. Body weight and composition were measured before and after the intervention.
Data were assessed using generalized linear mixed models where phase (pre, post) was the within-subject factor and subject was the random effect.
Participants self-reported using 29% of the provided vegetables as substitutes for other foods. With the increase in vegetable consumption, there were decreases in total grains (mean difference ± standard deviation; -0.97 ± 3.23 oz-equivalents; P = 0.02), protein foods (-1.24 ± 3.86 oz-equivalents; P = 0.01), saturated fats (-6.44 ± 19.63 g; P = 0.02), and added sugars (-2.44 ± 6.78 tsp-equivalents; P = 0.02) consumed. Total Healthy Eating Index 2015 scores increased (+4.48 ± 9.63; P = 0.001) and dietary energy density decreased (-0.44 ± 0.52 kcal/g; P < 0.0001). There was no change in total energy intake or body weight and composition.
Increasing vegetable consumption to meet Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations alters dietary intake patterns, improving diet quality and energy density. These findings highlight the importance of characterizing how individuals incorporate Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations into their diet.
了解蔬菜是如何纳入饮食的,尤其是了解《美国人膳食指南》推荐的蔬菜种类和数量,以及这如何改变饮食摄入模式,对于制定有针对性的行为改变干预措施至关重要。
确定提供的蔬菜是如何纳入超重和肥胖成年人饮食的;提供的蔬菜是否替代了其他食物;如果有任何影响,对饮食质量和体重及成分有什么影响。
本研究调查了动机蔬菜价值研究的次要结果,这是一项基于社区的、随机的、平行的、非盲对照试验。参与者按照 1:1 的比例随机分配到提供蔬菜干预组或对照注意力组。
参与者/设置:2015 年 10 月至 2017 年 9 月,从北达科他州大福克斯市招募了自我报告蔬菜摄入量低、年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间、体重指数≥25 的男性和女性。仅将随机分配到提供蔬菜干预组的参与者(n=51;失访率为 8%)纳入本二次分析。
每周提供 8 周《美国人膳食指南》推荐的蔬菜种类和数量。
使用每日自我报告和 24 小时膳食回忆来衡量提供的蔬菜是如何纳入饮食的。通过 2015 年健康饮食指数评估饮食质量。在干预前后测量体重和成分。
使用广义线性混合模型评估数据,其中阶段(干预前、干预后)是被试内因素,被试是随机效应。
参与者自我报告说,他们使用了 29%的提供蔬菜来替代其他食物。随着蔬菜摄入量的增加,总谷物(平均差异±标准偏差;-0.97±3.23盎司等价物;P=0.02)、蛋白质食物(-1.24±3.86盎司等价物;P=0.01)、饱和脂肪(-6.44±19.63g;P=0.02)和添加糖(-2.44±6.78茶匙等价物;P=0.02)的摄入量均有所下降。2015 年健康饮食指数总分增加(+4.48±9.63;P=0.001),饮食能量密度降低(-0.44±0.52 千卡/克;P<0.0001)。总能量摄入、体重和成分没有变化。
增加蔬菜摄入量以满足《美国人膳食指南》的建议会改变饮食摄入模式,从而提高饮食质量和能量密度。这些发现强调了描述个体如何将《美国人膳食指南》的建议纳入其饮食的重要性。