Centre for International Conflict Analysis and Management (CICAM), Radboud University Nijmegen, Postbus 9108, 6500, HK, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114876. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114876. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
In recent years the concept of moral injury has become a common term to describe the lasting impact of moral transgressions on frontline workers. This article aims to broaden the largely clinical debate by involving the views of a diverse group of mental health practitioners who support military and police personnel in the Netherlands. These practitioners are chaplains, confidential counsellors, social workers, psychologists and integrity officers. How do these practitioners describe the moral injuries of servicemen and police officers and how do they think these should be approached? Through interviews with thirty different practitioners this study shows that definitions of moral injuries diverge considerably. In addition, the article analyses six different approaches to moral injuries. These range from framing moral injury as an exceptional problem that requires specific expertise, to seeing it as a broad issue that places workers in a larger moral community. An analysis of this variety both serves as an indication of possible ways to deal with moral injuries, and as a basis for a critical reflection on the implications of various approaches.
近年来,道德伤害的概念已成为一个常用术语,用于描述道德违规对前线工作人员的持久影响。本文旨在通过纳入荷兰支持军警人员的一组多元化心理健康从业者的观点,来扩大这一主要集中在临床方面的讨论。这些从业者包括牧师、保密顾问、社会工作者、心理学家和廉正官员。这些从业者如何描述军人和警察的道德伤害,以及他们认为应该如何处理这些伤害?通过对三十名不同从业者的访谈,本研究表明,道德伤害的定义存在很大差异。此外,本文还分析了六种不同的处理道德伤害的方法。这些方法从将道德伤害框定为需要特定专业知识的特殊问题,到将其视为一个使工作人员处于更大道德社区的广泛问题。对这种多样性的分析既是处理道德伤害的可能方法的指示,也是对各种方法的影响进行批判性反思的基础。