Mental Health Center Ballerup, Copenhagen University Hospital, Ballerup, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Psychopathology. 2022;55(3-4):219-225. doi: 10.1159/000522505. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
Valid and reliable methods for diagnosing depression are essential. The present study aimed to test the performance of a new diagnostic interview for depression focusing on the core symptoms of depression.
We developed a diagnostic interview for depression: the CORE Diagnostic Interview, CORE-DI, which assesses each of the core features of depression on the four dimensions: quality, reactivity, globality, and fluctuations over time. The diagnostic performance of this interview was tested in a clinical study including 83 individuals presenting with various depressive symptoms, who were interviewed independently (1) by means of the CORE-DI and the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.), and (2) by highly skilled specialists in depression representing gold standard diagnoses.
We compared the outcome of the CORE-DI, the M.I.N.I., and the diagnosis made by clinicians, respectively, versus the gold standard diagnosis, using diagnostic efficiency statistics. The CORE-DI diagnosed depression with a high specificity (0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97, for International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-10 criteria and 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.95, for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM-5] criteria) compared to both M.I.N.I (specificity 0.44, 95% CI: 0.33-0.55) and clinical diagnoses (specificity 0.76, 95% CI: 0.67-0.85). The sensitivity of the CORE-DI was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.55-0.72) for ICD-10 criteria and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57-0.77) for DSM-5 criteria.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The CORE-DI increased the specificity of the depression diagnosis substantially compared to clinical diagnoses and the diagnoses obtained by M.I.N.I. The results point to the usefulness of an elaborated and systematic assessment of the core symptoms in the examination of patients with depressive symptoms and thereby indicate a way for further development of specific diagnostic tools for depression in both clinical and research settings. However, it should be noted that the sensitivity of the CORE-DI was modest, and the psychometric properties of the CORE-DI might be different in other settings with higher or lower prevalence or severity of depressive symptoms.
有效的和可靠的抑郁症诊断方法至关重要。本研究旨在测试一种新的诊断访谈,重点关注抑郁症的核心症状,以评估其对抑郁症的诊断性能。
我们开发了一种抑郁症诊断访谈:CORE 诊断访谈(CORE-DI),该访谈评估了抑郁症的四个维度的每个核心特征:质量、反应性、整体性和随时间的波动。在一项包括 83 名具有各种抑郁症状的个体的临床研究中,我们通过独立的方式(1)通过 CORE-DI 和 Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview(MINI)进行访谈,以及(2)由具有丰富抑郁症诊断经验的专家进行访谈,来测试该访谈的诊断性能。
我们使用诊断效率统计数据,将 CORE-DI、MINI 和临床医生的诊断结果分别与金标准诊断进行比较。与 MINI(特异性 0.44,95%CI:0.33-0.55)和临床诊断(特异性 0.76,95%CI:0.67-0.85)相比,CORE-DI 对抑郁症的诊断具有较高的特异性(0.91,95%CI:0.85-0.97,用于国际疾病分类[ICD]-10 标准和 0.88,95%CI:0.81-0.95,用于诊断和统计手册[DSM-5]标准)。CORE-DI 的敏感性分别为 ICD-10 标准的 0.61(95%CI:0.55-0.72)和 DSM-5 标准的 0.67(95%CI:0.57-0.77)。
讨论/结论:与临床诊断和 MINI 诊断相比,CORE-DI 大大提高了抑郁症诊断的特异性。研究结果表明,在检查有抑郁症状的患者时,详细而系统地评估核心症状非常有用,并为在临床和研究环境中进一步开发特定的抑郁症诊断工具指明了方向。然而,需要注意的是,CORE-DI 的敏感性中等,CORE-DI 的心理测量特性可能在其他抑郁症状的患病率或严重程度较高或较低的环境中有所不同。