Suppr超能文献

超长效胰岛素与长效胰岛素对1型糖尿病患者糖尿病酮症酸中毒发生率的影响

Effects of Ultra-Long-Acting Insulin Compared to Long-Acting Insulin on Diabetic Ketoacidosis Incidence in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.

作者信息

Alsofiani Wafa A, Alessa Bandar H, Alsabaan Fahad, Althemery Abdullah U, Ghith Aliah M, Alfaifi Abdullah A

机构信息

Family Medicine and Diabetes Center, Prince Mansour Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Family Medicine Department, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Mar 5;15:733-739. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S351155. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This research was intended to explore the effects of new-generation basal insulin (degludec U100 And glargine U300) versus long-acting basal insulin (glargine U100, detemir) on the incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis episodes and diabetes treatment measures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional, retrospective medical record analysis. The study population included adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) who were on the hospital records in 2020. Data were collected from 221 eligible participants through review of electronic medical records. Each record was scanned for basal insulin type, total daily insulin dose, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) occurrences, and glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) levels. Data were collected from 6 months before to 6 months after the initiation of ultra-long-acting insulin. Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 3.5.2. The normality of distribution for each independent variable was verified using Shapiro-Wilk tests. The independent paired -test was used to compare insulin therapy measures between the two insulin regimens. The main outcome measures were the incidence of DKA episodes and clinical outcomes associated with diabetes.

RESULTS

The HbA1c did not change significantly before and after ultra-long-acting insulin therapy was initiated (9.9 vs 9.8, respectively; >0.05). Insulin total daily doses were significantly higher after shifting to ultra-long-acting insulin. Sub-analysis showed higher total daily insulin doses in glargine U300 users compared with degludec U100 users ( =0.0021). However, basal insulin doses did not change after treatment with ultra-long-acting insulin. No statistically significant difference in DKA occurrences was found before and after the start of ultra-long-acting insulin treatment.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of DKA episodes was not affected by changing the treatment to ultra-long-acting insulin. Moreover, the results suggest that insulin dosage and types are not the only cause of uncontrolled diabetes. Additional efforts should be made to cover all factors affecting diabetes complication control.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨新一代基础胰岛素(德谷胰岛素U100和甘精胰岛素U300)与长效基础胰岛素(甘精胰岛素U100、地特胰岛素)对糖尿病酮症酸中毒发作发生率及糖尿病治疗措施的影响。

患者与方法

这是一项横断面回顾性病历分析。研究人群包括2020年医院记录中有1型糖尿病(DM)的成年人。通过查阅电子病历从221名符合条件的参与者中收集数据。每份记录均扫描基础胰岛素类型、每日胰岛素总剂量、糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)发生情况以及糖化血红蛋白A1C(HbA1c)水平。数据收集时间为超长效胰岛素起始前6个月至起始后6个月。使用R 3.5.2版本进行统计分析。使用夏皮罗-威尔克检验验证每个自变量的分布正态性。采用独立配对检验比较两种胰岛素治疗方案之间的胰岛素治疗措施。主要观察指标为DKA发作发生率及与糖尿病相关的临床结局。

结果

开始超长效胰岛素治疗前后,HbA1c无显著变化(分别为9.9和9.8;P>0.05)。转换为超长效胰岛素后,每日胰岛素总剂量显著更高。亚组分析显示,甘精胰岛素U300使用者的每日胰岛素总剂量高于德谷胰岛素U100使用者(P = 0.0021)。然而,使用超长效胰岛素治疗后基础胰岛素剂量未改变。开始超长效胰岛素治疗前后,DKA发生率无统计学显著差异。

结论

改为超长效胰岛素治疗并未影响DKA发作频率。此外,结果表明胰岛素剂量和类型并非糖尿病控制不佳的唯一原因。应做出更多努力以涵盖影响糖尿病并发症控制的所有因素。

相似文献

9
U300, a novel long-acting insulin formulation.U300,一种新型长效胰岛素制剂。
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2014 Dec;14(12):1849-60. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2014.970633. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

6
Basal insulin for the management of diabetic ketoacidosis.基础胰岛素治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒。
Eur J Intern Med. 2018 Jan;47:14-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验