• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖症手术中的订书机故障:MAUDE 数据库分析。

Stapler Malfunctions in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the MAUDE Database.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Texas Tech HSC Paul Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, TX, USA.

Universidad Autonoma Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico.

出版信息

JSLS. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00074.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2021.00074
PMID:35281706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8896815/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Staple line leaks are a serious problem in bariatric surgery and a major cause of serious morbidity and mortality. Adverse events caused by medical devices are reported to the Food and Drug Administration which maintains the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. We examined adverse stapler events reported to the MAUDE database, specifically with regards to bariatric surgery.

METHODS

The MAUDE database was queried for adverse events caused by staplers between January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020; events reported by Intuitive, Ethicon, and Medtronic/Covidien; and limited our search to "gastric bypass", "sleeve gastrectomy", "stapler malfunction" combined with each company.

RESULTS

There were 883 adverse events reported for Medtronic, 353 for Ethicon, and 35 for Intuitive. Approximately 3.5 million staple reloads sold in the study period. The reported misfire rate for Medtronic was 0.04% and for Ethicon was 0.02%. Data for Intuitive was unavailable. The most common reported event for Medtronic was failure to fire (n = 349), followed by misfire (n = 186). For Ethicon, the most common event was failure to fire (n = 146), followed by mechanical problems (n = 27). The most common event with the Intuitive stapler was leak (n = 10) and bleeding from staple line (n = 8).

CONCLUSIONS

Stapler malfunction is a very rare event in metabolic and bariatric surgery. All of the major stapler producers have transitioned to powered staplers with excellent safety profiles. Open and honest reporting about stapler malfunction is essential to determine the true safety of these ubiquitous devices.

摘要

背景

在减重手术中,吻合口渗漏是一个严重的问题,也是导致严重发病率和死亡率的主要原因。医疗器械不良事件会向美国食品和药物管理局报告,该机构维护制造商和用户设施设备体验(MAUDE)数据库。我们检查了向 MAUDE 数据库报告的与吻合器相关的不良事件,特别是与减重手术相关的事件。

方法

从 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日,我们在 MAUDE 数据库中查询了因吻合器引起的不良事件;查询了 Intuitive、Ethicon 和 Medtronic/Covidien 报告的事件;并将我们的搜索范围限制在“胃旁路术”、“袖状胃切除术”、“吻合器故障”与每家公司的组合。

结果

报告了 883 例 Medtronic 不良事件、353 例 Ethicon 不良事件和 35 例 Intuitive 不良事件。在研究期间,售出了约 350 万次吻合器重新加载。报告的 Medtronic 未击发率为 0.04%,Ethicon 为 0.02%。Intuitive 的数据不可用。Medtronic 最常见的报告事件是未击发(n = 349),其次是误击发(n = 186)。对于 Ethicon,最常见的事件是未击发(n = 146),其次是机械问题(n = 27)。Intuitive 吻合器最常见的事件是渗漏(n = 10)和吻合线出血(n = 8)。

结论

吻合器故障在代谢和减重手术中是一种非常罕见的事件。所有主要的吻合器生产商都已过渡到具有出色安全性能的电动吻合器。公开、诚实地报告吻合器故障对于确定这些无处不在的设备的真正安全性至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3f/8896815/e3a706ceac74/LS-JSLS210067F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3f/8896815/6ffbd2e78b25/LS-JSLS210067F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3f/8896815/7a5d4ef7a3a6/LS-JSLS210067F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3f/8896815/e3a706ceac74/LS-JSLS210067F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3f/8896815/6ffbd2e78b25/LS-JSLS210067F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3f/8896815/7a5d4ef7a3a6/LS-JSLS210067F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3f/8896815/e3a706ceac74/LS-JSLS210067F003.jpg

相似文献

1
Stapler Malfunctions in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the MAUDE Database.肥胖症手术中的订书机故障:MAUDE 数据库分析。
JSLS. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00074.
2
Revealing the scope of surgical device malfunctions: Analysis of the "hidden" Food and Drug Administration device database.揭示手术器械故障范围:对“隐藏”的美国食品和药物管理局器械数据库的分析。
Am J Surg. 2021 Jun;221(6):1121-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
3
The unacknowledged incidence of laparoscopic stapler malfunction.腹腔镜吻合器故障的未被承认发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):86-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2417-y. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
4
Assessment of a novel stapler performance for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.评估一种新型吻合器在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中的性能。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):4016-4021. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07858-0. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
5
Mortality related to the use of stapler devices and clip appliers: Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database.与吻合器装置和施夹器使用相关的死亡率:食品药品监督管理局制造商和用户设施设备经验数据库分析
Surgery. 2023 May;173(5):1184-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.11.013. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
6
Robotic stapler use: Is it safe?-FDA database analysis across multiple surgical specialties.机器人吻合器的使用:安全吗?-FDA 多外科专业数据库分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253548. eCollection 2021.
7
Endovascular Stapler Complications During Minimally Invasive Nephrectomy: An Updated Review of the FDA MAUDE Database From 2009-2019.血管内吻合器在微创肾切除术中的并发症:2009 年至 2019 年 FDA MAUDE 数据库的最新回顾。
Urology. 2021 Jul;153:181-184. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
Adverse Events Associated With Tracheostomy: A MAUDE Database Analysis.气管切开术相关不良事件:MAUDE 数据库分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb;170(2):391-395. doi: 10.1002/ohn.501. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
9
Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-Staple with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEON Stapler in Bariatric Surgery.减重手术中使用带预装加强板的美敦力三钉与 AEON 吻合器的止血和吻合口完整性的对比分析。
JSLS. 2024 Apr-Jun;28(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00058.
10
Literature Review on the Incidence of Primary Stapler Malfunction.文献综述:原发性吻合器故障的发生率
Surg Innov. 2020 Apr;27(2):229-234. doi: 10.1177/1553350619889274. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Rare Complications Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后的罕见并发症
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 30;13(15):4456. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154456.
2
Effectiveness of bedside staplers in bariatric robotic procedures.减重手术机器人中床边吻合器的效果。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5310-5318. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11045-w. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
3
Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-Staple with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEON Stapler in Bariatric Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Endovascular Stapler Complications During Minimally Invasive Nephrectomy: An Updated Review of the FDA MAUDE Database From 2009-2019.血管内吻合器在微创肾切除术中的并发症:2009 年至 2019 年 FDA MAUDE 数据库的最新回顾。
Urology. 2021 Jul;153:181-184. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Comparative Effectiveness Assessment of Two Powered Surgical Stapling Platforms in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Matched Study.两种电动手术吻合器平台在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中的比较有效性评估:一项回顾性匹配研究
Med Devices (Auckl). 2020 Jul 7;13:195-204. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S256237. eCollection 2020.
3
减重手术中使用带预装加强板的美敦力三钉与 AEON 吻合器的止血和吻合口完整性的对比分析。
JSLS. 2024 Apr-Jun;28(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00058.
4
Assessing the Reproducibility of Research Based on the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Data.基于食品和药物管理局制造商和用户设施设备经验数据评估研究的可重复性。
J Patient Saf. 2024 Aug 1;20(5):e45-e58. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001220. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
A Comparison of the Preclinical Performance of the Echelon™+ Stapler with Thunderbird Reloads to Two Commercial Endoscopic Surgical Staplers.配备雷鸟可再装填钉匣的埃施朗™+吻合器与两款商用内镜手术吻合器的临床前性能比较。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2023 Dec 5;16:229-236. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S443067. eCollection 2023.
6
Improving Performance and Access to Difficult-to-Reach Anatomy with a Powered Articulating Stapler.使用电动关节吻合器提高对难以触及解剖部位的操作性能及可达性。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Sep 2;15:329-339. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S379717. eCollection 2022.
Trends in revisional bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database 2015-2017.
2015-2017 年 MBSAQIP 数据库中减重手术翻修的趋势。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Jul;16(7):908-915. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States.美国代谢与减重外科学会 2018 年美国代谢与减重手术实施预估。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Apr;16(4):457-463. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.022. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
5
Literature Review on the Incidence of Primary Stapler Malfunction.文献综述:原发性吻合器故障的发生率
Surg Innov. 2020 Apr;27(2):229-234. doi: 10.1177/1553350619889274. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Predictors and outcomes of bleed after sleeve gastrectomy: an analysis of the MBSAQIP data registry.袖状胃切除术后出血的预测因素和结果:MBSAQIP 数据登记分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Oct;15(10):1675-1681. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review.五种缝钉线加固方案在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中漏率的比较:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):396-407. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
8
Predictors and outcomes of leak after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of the MBSAQIP data registry.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后漏的预测因素和结果:MBSAQIP 数据登记分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Mar;15(3):396-403. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
9
Staple Line Treatment and Bleeding After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后吻合钉线处理与出血
JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00056.
10
Impact of Powered and Tissue-Specific Endoscopic Stapling Technology on Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy Procedures: A Retrospective, Observational Study.动力型和组织特异性内镜吻合技术对胸腔镜肺叶切除术临床和经济结局的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
Adv Ther. 2018 May;35(5):707-723. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0679-z. Epub 2018 Apr 16.